CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Feb 14 16:22:56 2006
|
Stefan, I am concerned that there are becoming too many Linux dependencies in terms of required libraries and header files. Although we have a replacement
for the [code]forkpty()[/code] routine, I am running into many other dependencies, the latest of which is pty.h. Aren't there guidelines in GCC that point
out what is available cross-platform and what is not? For example, any SVR# (System Five, Release XX) based Unix will not include the forkpty() function, |
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 14 17:43:15 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, I am concerned that there are becoming too many Linux dependencies in terms of required libraries and header files. Although
we have a replacement for the [code]forkpty()[/code] routine, I am running into many other dependencies, the latest of which is pty.h. Aren't there guidelines
in GCC that point out what is available cross-platform and what is not? For example, any SVR# (System Five, Release XX) based Unix will not include the |
|
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Feb 14 22:31:08 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, I am concerned that there are becoming too many Linux dependencies in terms of required
libraries and header files. Although we have a replacement for the [code]forkpty()[/code] routine, I am running into many other dependencies, the latest
of which is pty.h. Aren't there guidelines in GCC that point out what is available cross-platform and what is not? For example, any SVR# (System Five, |
|
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 15 18:25:15 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Question: Is the functionality really just to issue an arbitrary command-string to a "shell" and have the result stuffed back into
an eLog variable? I'm not an expert but it would seem that such a feature would be universally available or could be used to construct a suitable routine.
|
|
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Feb 15 19:02:32 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Question: Is the functionality really just to issue an arbitrary command-string to a "shell"
and have the result stuffed back into an eLog variable? I'm not an expert but it would seem that such a feature would be universally available or could
be used to construct a suitable routine.
|
|
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 17 13:31:00 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]If possible, could one use the [code]int system(const char *s);[/code] function in conjunction with a filei/o function as the means
for getting the results of a system call back into a var. Perhaps [code]char *tmpnam(char *s);[/code], running a command via [code]int system(const char
*s);[/code], then opening that file for a read would accomplish what is being desired?
|
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Steve Jones on Mon Feb 20 17:50:33 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]If possible, could one use the [code]int system(const char *s);[/code] function in conjunction with a filei/o
function as the means for getting the results of a system call back into a var. Perhaps [code]char *tmpnam(char *s);[/code], running a command via [code]int
system(const char *s);[/code], then opening that file for a read would accomplish what is being desired?
|
Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Feb 14 12:57:37 2006 
|
Hello,
We have elogd running on a pc, say cmsdaqpreseries, that also runs an apache server and we've made sure that it's only accessible through the apache server, |
|
Re: Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 14 13:40:49 2006
|
Hi Dimitrios,
I know where your problem is and you could actually help me in solving it. The reason of the problem is the redirection. After you login, you get redirected |
|
Re: Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Feb 14 14:23:04 2006
|
Hi Stefan,
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
|
|
Re: Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Feb 14 16:06:28 2006
|
Hi,
The problem was coming from the fact that elog did not supports request coming from multiple hops through proxies. You got the ful string of them in the |
|
Re: Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 15 18:13:25 2006
|
| Thanks for the patch, I committed it to Subversion Revision #1657. |
|
email problems, posted by Chris Warner on Tue Feb 7 21:02:22 2006
|
When I select to get email notification on new logbook entries I receive this error when entering a new record.
Error sending Email via "xxx.xxx.xxx.xx": Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL FROM: christopher_warner@xxx.gov SIZE=1985" unrecognized or missing
|
|
Re: email problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 8 15:29:03 2006
|
[quote="Chris Warner"]Error sending Email via "xxx.xxx.xxx.xx": Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL FROM: christopher_warner@xxx.gov SIZE=1985" unrecognized
or missing
[/quote]
|
|
Re: email problems, posted by Chris Warner on Wed Feb 8 18:38:30 2006
|
The email address id correct. I am using an Elog Binary. I don't have the source code .
Chris Warner
|
|
Re: email problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 9 09:09:30 2006
|
[quote="Chris Warner"]The email address id correct. I am using an Elog Binary. I don't have the source code.[/quote]
Ok, so I removed the [B]SIZE=xxx[/B] parameter, which is not strictly necessary anyhow I believe. So wait for the next release, and you can try. |
|
Re: email problems, posted by Chris Warner on Fri Feb 10 21:26:33 2006
|
Do you have an ise when that will be?
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Chris Warner"]The email address id correct. I am using an Elog Binary. I don't have the source code.[/quote]
|
|
Re: email problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 10 21:50:27 2006
|
[quote="Chris Warner"]Do you have an ise when that will be?[/quote]
In about a week from now. |
Posting without logging in!, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Thu Feb 9 14:15:54 2006
|
Hi all! This is an HTTP POST request submitted from the command line using curl, and providing no authentication information. If I can post as myself using
this command, then shouldn't something be done about this? Cheers, Dimitris |
|
Re: Posting without logging in!, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 10 11:41:38 2006
|
[quote="Dimitris"]Hi all! This is an HTTP POST request submitted from the command line using curl, and providing no authentication information. If I can
post as myself using this command, then shouldn't something be done about this?[/quote]
|
|
Re: Posting without logging in!, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Fri Feb 10 16:16:11 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
Yes indeed. I fixed that in SVN revision 1655. I upgraded this server so you can try again if it works.[/quote]
|
|
Work on PAM Support?, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Feb 8 18:23:52 2006
|
Stefan (or any others):
Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers from Sun and looking |
|
Re: Work on PAM Support?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 9 09:12:44 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers
from Sun and looking at sample code.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Work on PAM Support?, posted by Steve Jones on Thu Feb 9 19:51:26 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading
the developer papers from Sun and looking at sample code.[/quote]
|
|
menu commands - user list does not match config list, posted by Alan Stone on Thu Feb 9 00:37:29 2006
|
I am attempting to configure the Elog for use at the CMS Remote Operations Center
at Fermilab. I included the following option:
|
|
Re: menu commands - user list does not match config list, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 9 09:04:05 2006
|
[quote="Alan Stone"]I am attempting to configure the Elog for use at the CMS Remote Operations Center
at Fermilab. I included the following option:
|
|
Problem with MOptions , posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Wed Feb 8 07:31:09 2006
|
After upgrading to 2.6.1-1 (actually donwgraded in case of this problem to 2.6.0) i was not longer able to selct more than one MOptions selection in my
ELOGs. Only the first slected selection was acepted by ELOG. Ex:
|
|
Re: Problem with MOptions , posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 8 11:56:02 2006
|
[quote="Ulrich Trüssel"]After upgrading to 2.6.1-1 (actually donwgraded in case of this problem to 2.6.0) i was not longer able to selct more than one MOptions
selection in my ELOGs. Only the first slected selection was acepted by ELOG. Ex:
|
|
Numbered lists get closed by </ul>, posted by T. Ribbrock on Mon Jan 30 16:26:08 2006
|
I just ran into the following problem (and was able to reproduce it in the "demo" logbook on this site):
[LIST]
|
|
Re: Numbered lists get closed by </ul>, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 7 12:58:10 2006
|
[quote="T. Ribbrock"]I just ran into the following problem (and was able to reproduce it in the "demo" logbook on this site):
[LIST]
|