ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68315
|
Mon May 2 22:20:40 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | posting messages through email | Hello,
Has anyone implemented an email gateway for ELOG, allowing users to submit entries by sending an email? Granted this should be possible using the elog client binary, but I thought I'd see if I've overlooked any examples or docs first.
Thanks!
Devin |
68318
|
Wed May 11 02:59:53 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | elog client binary with webserver authentication | Is it possible to submit entries using the elog client binary when the server is configured with webserver authentication (when the server requires the X-Forwarded-User header)? One option would be if the server could support both webserver and kerberos (or even file) authentication, but neither
"Authentication = Webserver, Kerberos" nor "Authentication = Webserver, File" seem to work.
In addition to using the elog binary to talk to the elog server directly, we've unsuccessfully tried using curl to post data to the apache server url (URL in elogd.cfg). We can read entries using curl, but haven't yet been able to submit entries.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Devin |
68319
|
Wed May 18 16:19:07 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Request | Linux | 3.1.1 | support "authentication = webserver, kerberos" | The elog client binary does not work with webserver authentication. One fix would be to support both webserver and kerberos authentication (authentication = webserver, kerberos), similar to how you currently support
"authentication = kerberos, file".
A more general discussion of the elog client binary with webserver authentication can be found at https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/68318 .
Many thanks,
Devin |
68442
|
Mon Oct 17 20:15:09 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: posting messages through email | Just incase anyone's interested, we went ahead and wrote a python script to act as an email gateway for ELOG. If anyone's interested, we'd be happy to share and appreciate any additional improvements.
- You can send a new message to the email address to start a new thread.
- You can reply to messages received from that logbook. If you include the message you are replying to in the body of your message, the reply will be threaded appropriately as a response to the initial message.
- The body of a new message will only include the text/html portion of a MIME message if it's available.
- Attachments work, although we remove spaces and add a random identifier (to avoid collisions) to each filename.
- the Author field is derived using the From address of the email.
- the subject field is derived using the Subject of the email.
- both single and double quotes are preserved in the author, subject, or body of the message
Devin
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone implemented an email gateway for ELOG, allowing users to submit entries by sending an email? Granted this should be possible using the elog client binary, but I thought I'd see if I've overlooked any examples
or docs first.
>
> Thanks!
> Devin |
68520
|
Mon Jan 2 16:32:18 2017 |
| Devrim Esenturk | devrim.esenturk@gmail.com | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-3f311c5 | Gmail email smtp settings | Hi all
I am trying to send email via Gmail smtp with no success. Elog uses port 25 which is not allowed. I need to use 587 or 465 ports to send mail. How can I change the port?
Have a good year all!
Devrim |
68649
|
Fri Jul 21 15:24:33 2017 |
| Devrim Esenturk | devrim.esenturk@gmail.com | Question | Windows | Latest | Conditional attribute activation | I have a stock database running latest elog version on windows. I am reserving some products which not been sent to customer mistakenly and using value "reserved" for it. But I need another attribute for comment reason of reserving but this attribute must be activated when reserved value selected. Is this possible? I didn't see any option for this at admin guide.
Thank you |
68852
|
Fri Oct 26 14:22:59 2018 |
| Devrim Esenturk | devrim.esenturk@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.3-7933898 | How many "Extendable options" can I add? | Hi
I am trying to add "Extendable options" for some attribute as below example. However button to add new item for list appears only for the first "Extendable options", if disable the first with (;), button appears for the second. It means elog add new item button only the first line "Extendable options" not for other?
Is this a limitation or bug or am I doing something wrong?
Options Require = N/A, Camera{1}, Lens{2}, Other{3}
{1} MOptions Require Model= XNB-6001, PNM-7000VD, PNM-9000VQ, PNM-9320VQ
{2} MOptions Require Lens = SLA-T2480, SLA-T2480V, SLA-T4680, SLA-T4680V, SLA-T1080F, SLA-2M2400P, SLA-2M2800P, SLA-2M3600P, SLA-2M6000P, SLA-2M1200P, SLA-5M3700P, SLA-5M4600P, SLA-5M7000P, SLA-2M2400Q, SLA-2M2800Q, SLA-2M3600Q, SLA-2M6000Q, SLA-5M3700Q, SLA-5M4600Q, SLA-5M7000Q, SLA-2M2400D, SLA-2M2800D, SLA-2M3600D, SLA-2M6000D
{3} MOptions Require Other = Base Unit
Extendable options = Require Model
Extendable options = Require Lens
Extendable options = Require Other
Thank you
Devrim |
68855
|
Fri Oct 26 19:15:19 2018 |
| Devrim Esenturk | devrim.esenturk@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.3-7933898 | Re: How many "Extendable options" can I add? | No problem :)
Your suggestion worked as it must be. I didn't see "Extendable options = <list>" on guide :/
I guess I need rest a little bit... :(
Thank you
Have a great weekend
Devrim
Grant Jeffcote wrote: |
Apologies that should have been Devrim (autocorrect again) :-(
Grant Jeffcote wrote: |
David,
Try
Extendable options = Require Model, Require Lens, Require Other,
Regards
Grant
Devrim Esenturk wrote: |
Hi
I am trying to add "Extendable options" for some attribute as below example. However button to add new item for list appears only for the first "Extendable options", if disable the first with (;), button appears for the second. It means elog add new item button only the first line "Extendable options" not for other?
Is this a limitation or bug or am I doing something wrong?
Options Require = N/A, Camera{1}, Lens{2}, Other{3}
{1} MOptions Require Model= XNB-6001, PNM-7000VD, PNM-9000VQ, PNM-9320VQ
{2} MOptions Require Lens = SLA-T2480, SLA-T2480V, SLA-T4680, SLA-T4680V, SLA-T1080F, SLA-2M2400P, SLA-2M2800P, SLA-2M3600P, SLA-2M6000P, SLA-2M1200P, SLA-5M3700P, SLA-5M4600P, SLA-5M7000P, SLA-2M2400Q, SLA-2M2800Q, SLA-2M3600Q, SLA-2M6000Q, SLA-5M3700Q, SLA-5M4600Q, SLA-5M7000Q, SLA-2M2400D, SLA-2M2800D, SLA-2M3600D, SLA-2M6000D
{3} MOptions Require Other = Base Unit
Extendable options = Require Model
Extendable options = Require Lens
Extendable options = Require Other
Thank you
Devrim
|
|
|
|
|