ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1655
|
Mon Feb 6 16:44:46 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Angus Au wrote: | ld: fatal: library -lutil: not found |
The util library was added recently because of the new shell substitution functionaly, which requires the forkpty() function call. If you know in which library the forkpty is available on solaris, the makefile could be adjusted accordingly. If the forkpty is not available at all, we have to disable the shell substitution under solaris via conditional compilation. |
Steve Jones wrote: | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?
-- Ah, just looked at the docs, I see what that buys us. Surely there is a similar function available that is cross platform?
|
|
1656
|
Mon Feb 6 16:48:17 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform |
Steve Jones wrote: | I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us? |
See the config manual and look for $shell |
1657
|
Mon Feb 6 16:53:41 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | 2.6.1 | Re: elog allows me to create user "blahblah " |
Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: | I wouldn't want some imposter to start entering stuff under the username of another user, so it would be nice if I could have some way of forcing them to have a password, even if it's a one-letter password. |
Ok, I added an empty password check. If too many people will complain, I will make it a flag. |
1658
|
Mon Feb 6 17:15:11 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Other | 2.6.1 | Re: sort after find |
Willem Koster wrote: | Obviously I would like to be able to sort the result of a find-query. |
That worked some time ago, but did not work currently. So I fixed that in the current SVN version. |
1659
|
Tue Feb 7 12:58:10 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1-1637 | Re: Numbered lists get closed by </ul> |
T. Ribbrock wrote: | I just ran into the following problem (and was able to reproduce it in the "demo" logbook on this site):
Numbered list follows:
- one
- two
- three
This text is indented, as the list was not closed properly.
- four
- five
- six
And now we have double indention... |
I can't see any double indention there...
But seriously I fixed that problem and updated this elog server already. It's in SVN revison 1653. The code now correctly chooses the proper </ul> or </ol>. What will not work however are nested lists, like an ordered list inside an unordere list, but that's anyhow very uncommon. |
1660
|
Tue Feb 7 21:02:22 2006 |
| Chris Warner | christopher_warner@dcd.uscourts.gov | Question | Linux | | email problems |
When I select to get email notification on new logbook entries I receive this error when entering a new record.
Error sending Email via "xxx.xxx.xxx.xx": Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL FROM: christopher_warner@xxx.gov SIZE=1985" unrecognized or missing
The user that sent the message was a test account that I set up. I entered the email address in the box provided and I am not sure what may be causing the difficulty.
Any thoughts as to what may be causing this? |
1661
|
Wed Feb 8 07:31:09 2006 |
| Ulrich Trüssel | ulrich.truessel@familienhund.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.1-1 | Problem with MOptions |
After upgrading to 2.6.1-1 (actually donwgraded in case of this problem to 2.6.0) i was not longer able to selct more than one MOptions selection in my ELOGs. Only the first slected selection was acepted by ELOG. Ex:
MOptions Test = Aa, Bb, Cc, Dd, Ee, Ff, Gg
Selecting: Bb, Cc, Gg
Submitting the entry form, autoreturn to the overview of the even made entry, only Bb was taken.
Any Idea what's happen? Did I miss something changing in 2.6.1-1 or may this be a bug? Thanks for ideas?
Would loke to upgreade to 2.6.1. in case of the new forms for long MOptions, but need to selct more than one! |
1662
|
Wed Feb 8 11:56:02 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.1-1 | Re: Problem with MOptions |
Ulrich Trüssel wrote: | After upgrading to 2.6.1-1 (actually donwgraded in case of this problem to 2.6.0) i was not longer able to selct more than one MOptions selection in my ELOGs. Only the first slected selection was acepted by ELOG. Ex:
MOptions Test = Aa, Bb, Cc, Dd, Ee, Ff, Gg
Selecting: Bb, Cc, Gg
Submitting the entry form, autoreturn to the overview of the even made entry, only Bb was taken.
Any Idea what's happen? Did I miss something changing in 2.6.1-1 or may this be a bug? Thanks for ideas?
Would loke to upgreade to 2.6.1. in case of the new forms for long MOptions, but need to selct more than one! |
That should work in 2.6.1-2 now. |