| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
68166
|
Tue Oct 27 14:58:20 2015 |
 | Julian Brower | julian.brower@stfc.ac.uk | Question | Windows | latest | Re: Please advise on how to set up selective email notification on logbooks |
Thanks Andreas, I will read that section. Julian
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
Hi Julian,
there is a whole chapter in the documentation about that: https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#email
If I have to send email, e.g. for Controls issues entered in the operation logbook, I do send the email to a specific mailman mailing list for that group.
It is cumbersome to manage email groups in the logbook configuration - in particular if the same lists exists in different logbooks. I only refer to the mailing list then in ELOG, and the groups can manage their lists themself.
I do maintain about 30 logbooks and there are about 10 groups at my institutes that desire email notifications for ELOG entries related to the systems they manage.
Cheers
Andreas
| Julian Brower wrote: |
|
Please advise on how to set up selective email notification on logbooks; We want to send an email to specific people when an event that involves them is entered?
At the moment, we currently get an email entry for every new logbook entry. Thanks
|
|
|
|
68165
|
Tue Oct 27 12:20:16 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: running more then one shell command when new entries is submitted |
As far as I know ELOG is recognising a configuration line as a comment only when it starts with a ';'.
I can assure you that ELOG does not treat the rest of the line as a comment when you use a ';' within a $shell() command: I do it a lot and it works fine. Here's a simple, generic example using the bash:
Preset Author = $shell(if [ $short_name = "Anonym" ] ;then echo $Author;else echo \"$long_name, $Author\";fi)
It adds $long_name to the Author field for non-anonymous entries.
Cheers Andreas
| kenzo Abrahams wrote: |
|
If i put the ';' into Execute the rest of the command becomes a comment thats why i was trying to use '&&' instead. If I encapulate the whole command in "" or '' then both commands are executed but the files im trying to write to gets created but no data is piped into it. When I use Execute with one command and pipe its output to a file everything works fine though.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
The command is passed to your shell, and some shells except more than one command. Most Linux shells accept commands separated by ';', which you can try yourself by entering for example: ls *.c; ls*.h
| kenzo Abrahams wrote: |
|
Hi
Im just curious is it possible to run more then one command using Execute new = <command> or will i have to run a script to run muliple commands.
I tried using '&&' to seperate more then one command but it seems that the first one only gets executed and the rest are just ignored.
Regards
Kenzo
|
|
|
|
|
68164
|
Tue Oct 27 11:23:43 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | latest | Re: Please advise on how to set up selective email notification on logbooks |
Hi Julian,
there is a whole chapter in the documentation about that: https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#email
If I have to send email, e.g. for Controls issues entered in the operation logbook, I do send the email to a specific mailman mailing list for that group.
It is cumbersome to manage email groups in the logbook configuration - in particular if the same lists exists in different logbooks. I only refer to the mailing list then in ELOG, and the groups can manage their lists themself.
I do maintain about 30 logbooks and there are about 10 groups at my institutes that desire email notifications for ELOG entries related to the systems they manage.
Cheers
Andreas
| Julian Brower wrote: |
|
Please advise on how to set up selective email notification on logbooks; We want to send an email to specific people when an event that involves them is entered?
At the moment, we currently get an email entry for every new logbook entry. Thanks
|
|
|
68163
|
Tue Oct 27 11:23:36 2015 |
| kenzo Abrahams | kenzoabrahams@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: running more then one shell command when new entries is submitted |
If i put the ';' into Execute the rest of the command becomes a comment thats why i was trying to use '&&' instead. If I encapulate the whole command in "" or '' then both commands are executed but the files im trying to write to gets created but no data is piped into it. When I use Execute with one command and pipe its output to a file everything works fine though.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
The command is passed to your shell, and some shells except more than one command. Most Linux shells accept commands separated by ';', which you can try yourself by entering for example: ls *.c; ls*.h
| kenzo Abrahams wrote: |
|
Hi
Im just curious is it possible to run more then one command using Execute new = <command> or will i have to run a script to run muliple commands.
I tried using '&&' to seperate more then one command but it seems that the first one only gets executed and the rest are just ignored.
Regards
Kenzo
|
|
|
|
68162
|
Tue Oct 27 11:19:41 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: running more then one shell command when new entries is submitted |
The command is passed to your shell, and some shells except more than one command. Most Linux shells accept commands separated by ';', which you can try yourself by entering for example: ls *.c; ls*.h
| kenzo Abrahams wrote: |
|
Hi
Im just curious is it possible to run more then one command using Execute new = <command> or will i have to run a script to run muliple commands.
I tried using '&&' to seperate more then one command but it seems that the first one only gets executed and the rest are just ignored.
Regards
Kenzo
|
|
|
68161
|
Tue Oct 27 11:14:16 2015 |
| kenzo Abrahams | kenzoabrahams@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: running more then one shell command when new entries is submitted |
The reason why im asking if it can be done using the Execute option is because I need to have the message id of the entry that was submitted and in an external script i dont have access to the variable
| kenzo Abrahams wrote: |
|
Hi
Im just curious is it possible to run more then one command using Execute new = <command> or will i have to run a script to run muliple commands.
I tried using '&&' to seperate more then one command but it seems that the first one only gets executed and the rest are just ignored.
Regards
Kenzo
|
|
|
68160
|
Tue Oct 27 11:03:49 2015 |
 | kenzo Abrahams | kenzoabrahams@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | running more then one shell command when new entries is submitted |
Hi
Im just curious is it possible to run more then one command using Execute new = <command> or will i have to run a script to run muliple commands.
I tried using '&&' to seperate more then one command but it seems that the first one only gets executed and the rest are just ignored.
Regards
Kenzo |
|
68159
|
Tue Oct 27 09:26:56 2015 |
| Julian Brower | julian.brower@stfc.ac.uk | Question | Windows | Latest | Re: How can we calculate and display the difference between two time entries on a log entry |
Stefan, I am not an expert in this field so I wondered how one goes about finding someone to write this and how one amends the soruce code? Is that allowed? Is it a feature than may be of use for other users? Julian
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Unfortunately elog cannot do calculations based on certain fields. You could however add some Javascript code (via "Bottom text = ..." for example), which does that. But that requires JavaScript knowledge to do so.
| Julian Brower wrote: |
|
See drawing below: We have a beam on and a beam off time. We want to fill in the lost time automaticaaly. Please can you help? Julian
|
|
|