Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 226 of 801  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Authordown Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  67   Thu Jul 11 10:36:09 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug fix  Re: a bug and a question
>    If you have only one entry in the logbook and have it set up in threaded 
> mode like: ?cmd=Search&mode=threaded&reverse=1, when you click on the icon 
> of the entry or the number of the entry to see it, it does not allow you 
> to.  If there is more than one entry, it works fine.  

Ok, has been fixed. Will come in 2.0.5

>    Also I wanted to make a submit page from where you could either go back 
> to the logbook which you just entered a message for or type a new entry for 
> that logbook.  First of all, is there a way to have only one file called 
> submitpage.html in which I can define this for all logbooks or do i need it 
> for ever logbook.  And also, is there a way I can even set a link that will 
> allow to create a new entry.  I tried: 
>     <a href="demo/?cmd=new">Enter</a> another message<p>
> 
> but for some reason it does not work.  Is there a way to implement this?

The documentation was wrong about that which has been corrected. The proper 
file contents should be

<h1>You successfully submitted a message</h1>
<a href="?cmd=Back">Back</a> to the logbook<p>
<a href="?cmd=New">Enter</a> another message

This way one only needs one file for all logbooks.
  1961   Mon Oct 9 22:32:11 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionAll2.6.2-1714Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox
Suppress email on edit has been implemented in the current SVN revision just similar to the Suppress default flag having possible values of 0, 1, 2 and 3.
  1962   Tue Oct 10 08:52:50 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows Re: Conditional E-Mail Attributes

Grant Jeffcote wrote:
My version shows V2.6.2-1699.
I noticed you have 1714, is that the latest binary or your compiled CVS release?


Try this one: http://midas/elog/download/windows/elog262-3.exe which is the most recent.
  1963   Tue Oct 10 08:56:49 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Append option for elog.exe

Ben Shepherd wrote:
Hi,

Would it be possible to add an 'append' option to the elog.exe client program? I would like to be able to write a simple script for adding images into a logbook - i.e. right-click in Windows and click 'add to log', or click a button in LabVIEW or Matlab and have an image immediately added to the last log entry. There would also have to be an option to either return a list of entry IDs, or just append to the last entry. Is this possible/likely?


Unfortunately it is not simple under Windows to extend the right-click functionality. What I do is to use a snapshot program (like HoverSnap). Triggered with a definable hot key, it grabs a region of the screen and puts it into a GIF file. Then you can attach it to an elog. I agree it takes a couple of clicks, but it's still a quick thing.
  1964   Tue Oct 10 09:00:08 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Ben Shepherd wrote:
Can we please have an option to turn off the thing that changes smileys automatically into
pictures?


Two ways:

  • Submit your entry in plain mode (insted of ELCode)
  • Put a \ in front of anything which is turned into a smiley, so ;) gets converted into Wink, but \;) does not get converted
  1966   Tue Oct 10 11:27:30 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Ben Shepherd wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

  • Submit your entry in plain mode (insted of ELCode)
  • Put a \ in front of anything which is turned into a smiley, so ;) gets converted into Wink, but \;) does not get converted


I realise that's possible, but things are getting converted into smileys that aren't intended to be smileys. Specifically, when I enter a question in brackets, the end bracket is converted into a smiley. (Like this?) should be (Like this\?). That is very annoying, and to be honest, I don't need the smileys. An option to switch them off would be the best thing.


I agree that the ?) smiley is annoying, so I changed it to ?-) which should prevent it from showing up in questions in brackets. I updated this server (you can see the effect above), the modification is committed to subversion.
  1969   Tue Oct 10 11:45:22 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Ben Shepherd wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

I agree that the ?) smiley is annoying, so I changed it to ?-) which should prevent it from showing up in questions in brackets. I updated this server (you can see the effect above), the modification is committed to subversion.


Thanks a lot! I'm going to pester you though - it would be really good if there was an option to turn them off completely. Surely it can't be a huge amount of work... ?


It's not the amount of work, it the intention to minimize the number of options. If you want a switch for the smileys, the next one wants a switch for automatic hot-linking (like http://...), the next one wants that only certain ELCode options are interpreted, not others, and then we will have a mess. By changing the ?-) definition I hope I have solved most cases without another flag. So either one has the comple ELCode set, or non. In the past I had many suggestions of new flags, which I could solve somehow otherwise. If I would not have done that, the manual would be twice as long by now...
  1970   Tue Oct 10 11:47:41 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Append option for elog.exe

Ben Shepherd wrote:
I think you misunderstand me. I was asking whether it would be possible for the elog command-line client program to have an "append to existing entry" option.


The elog command-line program has a -e switch to edit existing entries, but you need to know the ID of the entry.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6