| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1880
|
Sat Jul 15 17:58:46 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.2-1702 | Re: astonished icon |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | Hi Stefan,
I've been trying to use the astonished icon, but the preview or entry
display shows only a broken image.
I found in the elogd.c at line 5556 :
{"8o", "<img src=\"%sicons/eek.png\">"}
I copied the "astonished.png" to "eek.png" and it worked.
Is it the reason of the problem ? ?) |
Actually the C code should be "astonished.png" instead of "eek.png". I changed that in revision 1704. BTW, thanks for the Brazilian translation.  |
|
1881
|
Mon Jul 17 13:20:07 2006 |
| Gerald Ebberink | g.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nl | Question | Linux | 2.6.1 | Re: restrict access |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Gerald Ebberink wrote: | | As you can see, I have implemented a temporary fix in the way of allowing only certain hosts access. But where does this Internal error come from. |
I only can identify this error if you send me your current ("de-sensified") elogd.cfg. |
I have just installed the svn version of elog, and the problem has been fixed.
Thank you very much! |
|
1882
|
Mon Jul 17 13:44:37 2006 |
 | Gerald Ebberink | g.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nl | Comment | Linux | 2.6.2-1706 | Duplicate of a reply should be a reply |
Hello everybody
This weekend I found that if I duplicate a reply it does not become a reply it self.
Is this on purpouse?
I have been through the source a little (not much time for that) and I can not find a reason where the "in reply to" value is dropped.
Could anyone give me an pointer? |
|
1883
|
Mon Jul 17 13:49:37 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Comment | Linux | 2.6.2-1706 | Re: Duplicate of a reply should be a reply |
| Gerald Ebberink wrote: | Hello everybody
This weekend I found that if I duplicate a reply it does not become a reply it self.
Is this on purpouse?
I have been through the source a little (not much time for that) and I can not find a reason where the "in reply to" value is dropped.
Could anyone give me an pointer? |
This is on purpuse. The Duplicate functionality is ment to "clone" an existing entry, to save some typing work if an existing entry contains most of what one wants in a new entry. If one duplicates a reply, it is detached from the original thread, so there is not entry to attach the duplicate to. I guess you want to make a new reply to an existing entry, and then have another existing reply as a template for that, but this is not possible. If I would not drop the "in reply to" value, the duplicate would point to the wrong entry. |
|
1884
|
Wed Jul 19 12:20:34 2006 |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | Linux | | Use Email From = <string> |
Hi all,
My users have complained about the multiple "I'm away from xxx until xxx" automated replies that they get when they post an entry and notifications are sent with their email in the "From" field. I would therefore like to always use the address specified in the Use Email From line of the configuration file and never the user's address. Reading from the documentation:
The option Use Email From = <string> is used for the "From:" field in the email. Since more and more email servers do not accept invalid "From:" addresses in order to reduce spam mail, it might be important that a "real" email address is used in the "From:" field. By default, the email address of the currently logged in user is used for the "From:" field. If no user is logged in, or the current user has not specified a email address in the password database, the setting of the option Use Email From is used for the "From:" field.
Is there a way to override that default and always use the setting of the option Use Email From?
Thanks,
Dimitris |
|
1885
|
Wed Jul 19 12:35:16 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: Use Email From = <string> |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: | | My users have complained about the multiple "I'm away from xxx until xxx" automated replies that they get when they post an entry and notifications are sent with their email in the "From" field. |
Yes, I had the same problem with this forum.
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas wrote: | | Is there a way to override that default and always use the setting of the option Use Email From? |
Sure. You override the default by setting the Use Email From. In the forum I set it now to Use Email From = noreply@psi.ch which is a nonexisting address. While now this is ok, our former email server did not accept this because the user noreply does not exist at our institute. So you have to figure out if this works at CERN. |
|
1886
|
Wed Jul 19 12:47:58 2006 |
| Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: Use Email From = <string> |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | Sure. You override the default by setting the Use Email From. In the forum I set it now to Use Email From = noreply@psi.ch which is a nonexisting address. While now this is ok, our former email server did not accept this because the user noreply does not exist at our institute. So you have to figure out if this works at CERN. |
Thanks, Stefan! I misunderstood the documentation, thinking that the Use Email From option value was only used if the user submitting the entry had not registered an e-mail address when creating his/her elog account. This works fine. 
Cheers,
Dimitris |
|
1887
|
Wed Jul 19 15:05:02 2006 |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos | elaine@ccuec.unicamp.br | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.2-1702 | Re: astonished icon |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | Hi Stefan,
I've been trying to use the astonished icon, but the preview or entry
display shows only a broken image.
I found in the elogd.c at line 5556 :
{"8o", "<img src=\"%sicons/eek.png\">"}
I copied the "astonished.png" to "eek.png" and it worked.
Is it the reason of the problem ? ?) |
Actually the C code should be "astonished.png" instead of "eek.png". I changed that in revision 1704. BTW, thanks for the Brazilian translation. |
Thank you for your quick response !
 I'm glad to be able to contribute !
Regards,
Elaine |