Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 227 of 796  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Iconup Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  68913   Tue Mar 19 23:24:48 2019 Question Ross Gibsonross.gibson@newcastle.edu.auSince updating to verQuestionWindows3.1.4HTML editor not working after updating to V3.1.4
Since updating to v3.1.4 the HTML editor has stopped working. If I switch to HTML encoding, the editor appears with a blank field, cannot select or type in field and none of the buttons work.
I have tried reverting to earlier versions, but the issue persists. Any suggestions to rectify?
  68916   Thu Mar 21 16:14:00 2019 Question Ben Loerben.loer@pnnl.govQuestionLinux3.1.3elog.css and lock.png fail to load with top groups

As the title says, we have our elog running behind an Apache proxy that is also providing authentication. We also have top groups enabled.  The first time a user views a top group page with a fresh browser cache, the index is delivered, but requests for elog.css and lock.png are returned with http 302 with location set to the elog root.  (I.e., if the server is proxied under server.example.com/logs,  the first request for server.example.com/logs/TopGroup1/elog.css returns a 302 with location set to server.example.com/logs// ). 

Any subsequent visits return the files fine. The attached screenshot shows the network requests in chrome. 

Is this a proxy configuration issue, something we've set wrong in elog, ??

 

Attachment 1: elog1.png
elog1.png
  68917   Fri Mar 22 09:53:39 2019 Question Patricia Mendez Lorenzopatricia.mendez@cern.chQuestionLinuxlatestInterfaced with SSO

Dear Supporters,

 

I am evaluating the elog software as lobgook for high energy pgysics and I was just wondering the interface with SSO from the login point of view. Once euthenticated with SSO, can this authentication be also recognized by elog?

 

Thank you so much

Best Regards,

PAtricia

  68919   Mon Mar 25 12:31:34 2019 Question gibelin juliengibelin@unicaen.frQuestionLinux3.1.1 revision elog client through proxy

Dear users,

we started an elog serveur (using ssl) and open to the world which is working fine.

However I am trying to access it via the command line client, from a computer that uses a proxy to connect to internet.

The environnment variable are set :

declare -x ftp_proxy="ftp://myproxy:3128/"
declare -x http_proxy="http://myproxy:3128/"
declare -x https_proxy="https://myproxy:3128/"
declare -x socks_proxy="socks://myproxy:3128/"

 

but when I try to connect

elog  -h myelog -p 443 -l lognote -s 1 -u username passwd  -w last

I have the following message :

Cannot connect to host myelog, port 44

How should I proceed ?

Best regards

JG

:

 

  68922   Thu Mar 28 21:55:14 2019 Question Alan Grantagrant@winnipeg.caQuestionWindows3.1.2Hiding Logbook tabs

I know you can restrict access to logbooks on per user basis but can anyone tell me if it is possible to HIDE certain logbook tabs/groups on per user basis (ie, so they would just see logbooks they are authorized to see)?

  68929   Thu Apr 18 12:29:05 2019 Question Giuseppe Cucinottagiuseppe.cucinotta@unifi.itQuestionLinux | Windows3.1.3Pinned entry

Hi everybody,

sorry if this question has already been posed (I did a quick search but I didn't found anything): elog sorts entry by ID, I wonder if it is possible to pin an entry in order to be always on top of the page independently on its ID.

Thanks

Giuseppe

  68934   Wed Apr 24 09:15:26 2019 Question Nikolas Patronisnpatronis@uoi.grQuestionLinux3.1.3exclude access to a number of users in one logbook

How can I exclude the access of a number of users in one (out of two) logbooks running in the same server and URL?

  68946   Mon Apr 29 02:41:15 2019 Question Alan Grantagrant@winnipeg.caQuestionWindows3.1.2Last default = <n>

According to the doc on the setting "Last default = <n>" it is intended to restrict Quick Filter searches to the last (n) days of entries, however when I add "Last default = 28" to config it still returns entries far older then 28 days when using the filter search. Am I misunderstanding, or implementing it wrong? We must restrict searches through QF to reduce load.

A couple other side questions which are related:

The doc on this setting says: "Last default = <n>
Some logbooks are very big ans searching through all entries with quick filter can be time consuming. This option sets a default value for the Date quick filter, so that by default only the <n> days are displayed." ...... I'm assuming that by saying "only the <n> days are displayed" that it has actually only searched <n> days ................ vs seaching ALL the logbooks but only displaying <n> days. Please confirm.

Also, why wouldn't the "28" days spec display in the Select Period box beside the Quick Filters? Otherwise it appears to me to be a separate and conflicting item. Best regards!

ELOG V3.1.5-2eba886