ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67915
|
Wed May 20 01:45:09 2015 |
| Konstantin Olchanski | olchansk@triumf.ca | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.0 | elogd complains about unknown cookies |
elogd is spewing these messages about unknown cookies:
Received unknown cookie "is_returning"
Received unknown cookie "__utma"
Received unknown cookie "__utmz"
Received unknown cookie "SSESSee3cc9c70bedf9a840203765bf409d7b"
Received unknown cookie "SESSee3cc9c70bedf9a840203765bf409d7b"
Received unknown cookie "MidasWikiUserID"
Received unknown cookie "MidasWikiUserName"
Received unknown cookie "MidasWiki_session"
K.O. |
67914
|
Tue May 19 16:34:20 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Entry size too large for email notification |
Hi Jacky,
if I read the source code correctly then the maximum size of a base64 encoded email is hard coded to be 10 MB in elogd.h (recompile after changing it):
#define MAX_CONTENT_LENGTH 10*1024*1024
But I think that an 2.2 MB image should easily fit into that.
Andreas
Jacky Li wrote: |
Hi,
I am doing an inline image that is about 2.2 MB. When I do a submit, I got the following message:
Error sending Email via <i>"<email server>"</i>: Entry size too large for email notification.
May I know what is the limit of the entry size and how do I change it? Thank you.
Jacky
|
|
67913
|
Tue May 19 12:27:01 2015 |
| Jacky Li | zli@hawaii.edu | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Entry size too large for email notification |
Hi,
I am doing an inline image that is about 2.2 MB. When I do a submit, I got the following message:
Error sending Email via <i>"<email server>"</i>: Entry size too large for email notification.
May I know what is the limit of the entry size and how do I change it? Thank you.
Jacky |
67912
|
Tue May 19 12:26:39 2015 |
| Jacky Li | zli@hawaii.edu | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Entry size too large for email notification |
Hi,
I am doing an inline image that is about 2.2 MB. When I do a submit, I got the following message:
Error sending Email via <i>"<email server>"</i>: Entry size too large for email notification.
May I know what is the limit of the entry size and how do I change it? Thank you.
Jacky |
67911
|
Thu May 14 22:16:03 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1 | Re: csv import timestamp |
Hi Ferdinand,
"import" is meant to be used for files that have been exported with "find". Therefore it is not very flexible with the date format.
Todays date should look like that: "Thu 14 May 2015 22:12:00 +0200".
You have to convert your file that the date matches this format (BTW: I found this out by using the find - export feature; it may depend on a local configuration.)
Cheers
Andreas
Ferdinand Gassauer wrote: |
Thanks
what is the format of the Date field in the csv file ?
My Date is date and not datetime.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Ferdinand,
and that is exactly what happens when you import a csv file with a date field:
the creation date ($entry time) of the imported entries will be used from the "Date" column in the file.
I've just tried it and it works like a charm. Did you have any problems doing it?
Cheers
Andreas
Ferdinand Gassauer wrote: |
I have to import a csv with a date field, which represents the creation date
this date should be used as "date" timestamp which is set automatically, otherwise all entries get the current datetime as timestamp
|
|
|
|
67910
|
Thu May 14 07:01:23 2015 |
| Ferdinand Gassauer | f.gassauer@chricar.at | Question | Linux | 3.1 | Re: csv import timestamp |
Thanks
what is the format of the Date field in the csv file ?
My Date is date and not datetime.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Ferdinand,
and that is exactly what happens when you import a csv file with a date field:
the creation date ($entry time) of the imported entries will be used from the "Date" column in the file.
I've just tried it and it works like a charm. Did you have any problems doing it?
Cheers
Andreas
Ferdinand Gassauer wrote: |
I have to import a csv with a date field, which represents the creation date
this date should be used as "date" timestamp which is set automatically, otherwise all entries get the current datetime as timestamp
|
|
|
67909
|
Thu May 14 05:13:34 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.1.0 | Re: Elogd synchronisation with remote server |
> I came accross the admin guide and I was reading / searching for a way to sync logbooks across sites...
> elogd mention "-m" and "-M" ... not elog but elogd... with that description :
> synchronize logbook(s) with remote server
If you would have followed the shown link to the "elogd.cfg syntax page", you would have found the chapter Mirroring:
https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#mirroring
> Does it sync all logbooks ?
Not necessarily, but that is the default.
> is there any examples somewhere or advice ?
See above: you'll find examples under #mirroring
> Thanks :)
You're welcome. |
67908
|
Thu May 14 05:08:06 2015 |
| Francois Cloutier | Francois@fcmail.ca | Bug report | Windows | 3.1.0-3 | Re: Attribute not updated |
>
> > Seriously, I really hope It could make it... Could you try it on your side ?
>
> My personal opinion here is, that if you want others to investigate your problems, then the best way to do it is like that:
> - attach a minimal configuration that reproduces your problem (never attach a 100 line configuration, unless you've tested that the problem disappears
> regardless of which line you remove!);
> - attach the entry data, if the behaviour depends on the data;
> - use a specific, to the point subject line;
> - explain what you did, what happened and what you would have expected to happen;
> - ask kindly; and then
> - wait and hope for the best ;-)
>
> (This is actually a very general procedure; I think it is applicable to all newsgroups, forums, etc.)
>
> BTW: This tip was absolutely free of charge ;-)
Andreas,
Thanks for your comments. Thats why I posted in the first msg my configuration details... I just hope there can be a solution :)
I saw in the doc that an attribute cant be bigger than 100 char. but I couldn't figure the maximum size for options... I'm wondering if the issue comes from the browser not refreshing correctly or if its elog..
Again, I tought that if that was from elog limitations, the attributes wouldn't load the options presets at all... but they do, (attribute volume) ... just not all the time :)
I understand that you are proactive on this forum and eventually I was thinking of contributing with detailed specific config examples but for now I just would like to get on track :)
The last time I used Elog was 10 years ago :) it changed alot since :) |