| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
68044
|
Wed Jul 15 21:30:47 2015 |
 | Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.0-5be245e | Re: Customized email subject line for an updated entry | Since there were no responses, I decided to make good use of the fact that the software is thankfully open-sourced. I modified elogd.c and added just a couple of lines to get what I wanted.
22245,22250d22244
< if (old_mail && getcfg(lbs->name, "Use Email Subject Edit", subject, sizeof(subject))) {
< i = build_subst_list(lbs, slist, svalue, attrib, TRUE);
< sprintf(str, "%d", message_id);
< add_subst_list(slist, svalue, "message id", str, &i);
< strsubst_list(subject, sizeof(subject), slist, svalue, i);
< } else
These lines just follow the comment line: /* compose subject from attributes */
| Erkcan Ozcan wrote: |
|
Hi,
The default email subject line for a new entry is: "New ELOG entry", and the default email subject line for an edited entry is: "Updated ELOG entry". However when we set "Use Email Subject", both new entries and the updated entries use the same email subject. Is there an equivalent of "Use Email Heading Edit" for the subject line? I tried "Use Email Subject Edit", to no avail.
Thanks in advance,
e.
|
|
|
68629
|
Sat Jun 10 07:05:24 2017 |
 | Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.3-aded4ae | Server dropping SSL connection while uploading large files | Hi,
I am having trouble with uploading large (>0.5MB) files to elog. We click on upload and in a couple of seconds, the webbrowser complains that the server has dropped the connection.
Following the suggestions I found on these forums (https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66753), I increased the timeout.tv_sec to 30 in three locations in elogd.c, but this did not help.
The problem is present in my old elog installation (from ~2 years ago), as well as the latest git snapshot from bitbucket that I cloned on June 10, 2017.
PS: Upload seems to work for non-secure configuration. It still takes a while to load, but it completes. However we prefer to use secure connections ( SSL = 1 ).
PS: Using nmap I looked at the latency to the relevant port, it can be as high as 0.5sec, but most often it is shorter.
Cheers,
e. |
|
68634
|
Wed Jun 28 19:37:10 2017 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.3-aded4ae | Re: Server dropping SSL connection while uploading large files | Hi,
Could someone at least suggest how I could debug this problem myself? If I know where to start, perhaps I can fix it myself and contribute to the software.
Best,
e.
| Erkcan Ozcan wrote: |
|
Hi,
I am having trouble with uploading large (>0.5MB) files to elog. We click on upload and in a couple of seconds, the webbrowser complains that the server has dropped the connection.
Following the suggestions I found on these forums (https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66753), I increased the timeout.tv_sec to 30 in three locations in elogd.c, but this did not help.
The problem is present in my old elog installation (from ~2 years ago), as well as the latest git snapshot from bitbucket that I cloned on June 10, 2017.
PS: Upload seems to work for non-secure configuration. It still takes a while to load, but it completes. However we prefer to use secure connections ( SSL = 1 ).
PS: Using nmap I looked at the latency to the relevant port, it can be as high as 0.5sec, but most often it is shorter.
Cheers,
e.
|
|
|
66433
|
Sun Jul 5 19:14:05 2009 |
 | Ed Strohak | estrohak@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.3-2058 | Password recovery setup | I'm trying to use gmail to send password recovery e-mails, I get this error when I submit the email address.
"Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. 2sm5111524agd.34"
Any help or insight would be appreciated.
Ed... |
|
68296
|
Sat Apr 2 12:43:17 2016 |
| Ed Strohak | estrohak@gmail.com | Question | Windows | latest | Read Validation | I'm looking for config examples of a shift log book where operators have to check a box or select their name from a list to prove they have read the latest entries in the log, can anyone help.
Thanks for your time.
Ed.. |
|
68299
|
Mon Apr 4 13:05:55 2016 |
| Ed Strohak | estrohak@gmail.com | Question | Windows | latest | Re: Read Validation | Appreciate the help..
Thanks
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
As a variant of what Stefan has suggested:
Perhaps a simple comment is set up as the pre-loaded reply - perhaps including date and time. Maybe include the author's name in the comment, but all that is available anyway (see documentation for that). This bit isn't vital.
Then each user simply has to *reply* to the message concerned, and you then get the list of who has read it, available in threaded view of the comment and replies.
Of course this works best with small numbers of users, and where threads are never very long. Also, it means that you can lock the original message (prevent it being edited) which may be a particular concern depending on what you are using elog for.
You might also want to define an attribute that a reader can tick to say that they have taken action if it is important that someone has to take further action (as opposed to just reading) - and maybe that changes the colour of the background or the icon in front of the topic. Then there would be a record as to who has done the necessary, and later readers will know the matter is for information rather than needing attention. For example,. who kicked the power supply to the ion source on Monday morning to "wake it up" (this is true, but pre-elog, so was a paper record). John kicked it last Monday, and the power supply respects John, may be a statistic one could find from such information recorded as suggested here.
You may want a second attribute people have to explicity select so as to show they understand what they've read, rather than just reply/submit without having read... e.g. they have to select a digit of the ticket number, or some auto-generated number (or letter, I'm not characterist) that is within the original comment.
We all know people who click on things they've never read, and come on, we've all done it at times...
David.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Unfortunately a read confirmation is not foreseen in the Elog system. You would have to define one attribute for each shift worker, like "John has read", "Steve has read" and so on. Then each of the shift workes has to "Edit" each message an check his/her checkmark manually.
Stefan
| Ed Strohak wrote: |
|
I'm looking for config examples of a shift log book where operators have to check a box or select their name from a list to prove they have read the latest entries in the log, can anyone help.
Thanks for your time.
Ed..
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
Sun Dec 22 16:49:20 2002 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Question | | | email notification to a specific adress | I have some problem with email notification
for some logbooks I would like to notify only to specific adress
I try
Email All = adress1, adress2
Elog send well at 'adress1' and 'adress2'
but also to all of other users ?
how to restric these only to 'adress1 and adress2 ?
is it possible to notify according to attribue value like
Attributes = Test1, Test2
Email All = $Test1
or concatenation of $Test1 + '@mba.be' for example
Thanks
this is a wonderfull tools !
to improve documentation : true example are missing too much 'theorie'
but when I'm finish I'll put true sample on the net |
|
182
|
Sat Jan 4 17:55:49 2003 |
 | Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Comment | | | Re: logbook db size causing very slow response | > Was wondering if there were any tweaks/suggestions for improving the
> logbooks responsiviness. Our logbook was started 31 July 01. Since that
> time we have went from 1 logbook to 4 logbooks. Logbook 1 having 2651
> entries, logbook 2 having 300 entries, and the last 2 are new logbooks, so
> only a few entries.
>
> When user launches the logbook website, it takes considerable time to bring
> the site up. It seems to be directly related to the number of entries in
> the logbook. If I set up a dummy site with a couple logbooks and only a
> few entries, the logbook is very fast coming up as well as saving entries.
>
> Another thing that seems to slow the site down, is the number of users in
> the elog notification list (those who've subscribed). When you save a log
> entry, it takes around 30sec or longer for it to actually complete the
> save. If I remove the list of users from the notification list and just
> have a few, the save is very fast.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Eric
2600 entries is too much for this application as it load the all files
in computer memory
expand the server memory
Are you running on linux or Windows ? I suggest linux (faster)
We are working on the C source to move all data from flat to database like
SQL or mysql
when a parameter flag like 'status' = "OK" for instance
I suggest also to split in several logbook
but this is depend on your 'ELOG' parametrisation and logics
If your data are not 'sensitive' I can check on my linux server
Etienne |
|