ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
65810
|
Fri Apr 4 22:06:48 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: attachment indicator in summary view |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release. |
65811
|
Fri Apr 4 22:53:17 2008 |
| Edmundo T Rodriguez | edrodrig@chpnet.org | Request | All | | Re: attachment indicator in summary view |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Would it be possible to instead of appearing a "clip" and/or "multiple-clips" (as the number of attachments grow) to appear a number which will be = to the count of attachments to avoid the column become too wide?
Hope it works because this is tool better every day.
Keep up the GOOD Work! |
65812
|
Sat Apr 5 00:43:21 2008 |
| Dennis Seitz | dseitz@cosmology.berkeley.edu | Request | All | | Re: attachment indicator in summary view |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Thanks!
|
65816
|
Mon Apr 7 10:01:27 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: attachment indicator in summary view |
Edmundo T Rodriguez wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Would it be possible to instead of appearing a "clip" and/or "multiple-clips" (as the number of attachments grow) to appear a number which will be = to the count of attachments to avoid the column become too wide?
|
Ok, so I show individual clips up to five, and the number of attachments if more than five. |
65828
|
Sat Apr 12 22:04:58 2008 |
| Grant Jeffcote | grant@jeffcote.org | Request | All | | Re: attachment indicator in summary view |
Hi Stefan,
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary view (named Attachments) with the attachment file names below? Am I missing something?
Thanks
Dennis Seitz wrote
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
|
Nice idea. I implemented that feature, as can be seen at the contributions logbook for example. It will be contained in the next release.
|
Thanks!
|
|
65829
|
Sun Apr 13 16:04:09 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: attachment indicator in summary view |
Grant Jeffcote wrote: |
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary view (named Attachments) with the attachment file names below? Am I missing something?
|
Yes, you miss the paperlclip icon. Get it from here and copy it under elog/themes/default/attachment.png. |
66826
|
Tue May 18 16:40:15 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | All | svn | Re: attachment filename bug & Makefile issue |
> If I upload the file "000000_000000_file.txt", elog will chop the filename to "file.txt." Also, this effects
> the file's displayed "Uploaded" time. It shows the file as being uploaded on: "Tue Nov 30 00:00:00 1999"
Arghh! Why did you choose such a filename? This is the ELOG internal file format, which is YYMMDD_HHMMSS_name.ext.
For internal reasons (mainly for synchronization) the system checks every file name, and if it contains 6 numbers
followed by a "_" followed by 6 other numbers it thinks it's a valid date/time and uses that. Your time is however
0.0.0000, that's why it gets converted to some date in 1999. Do you absolutely need this functionality? While I can
easily remove the interpretation of the date, it would break the synchronization functionality and I would have to
find some other method to pass the file date/time, which would be quite some work. So if it's not too important for
you, I would like to keep it as it is.
> Makefile has the line:
>
> # flag for SSL support
> USE_SSL = 1
>
> However setting USE_SSL = 0 does not prevent the openssl libraries from being used. Same issue with USE_CRYPT.
> You have to comment them out.
>
> Lines 76-85 of Makefile should be replaced with this:
>
> ifdef USE_SSL
> ifneq ($(USE_SSL), 0)
> CFLAGS += -DHAVE_SSL
> LIBS += -lssl
> endif
> endif
>
> ifdef USE_CRYPT
> ifneq ($(USE_CRYPT), 0)
> CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CRYPT
> LIBS += -lcrypt
> endif
> endif
The original idea was that one outcomments the whole line, like
#USE_SSL = 1
which always worked, but I agree that your solution is more general, so I changed the official Makefile. Thanks for
that. |
66830
|
Thu May 20 04:33:07 2010 |
| A. Martin | amartin@example.com | Bug report | All | svn | Re: attachment filename bug & Makefile issue |
> > If I upload the file "000000_000000_file.txt", elog will chop the filename to "file.txt." Also, this effects
> > the file's displayed "Uploaded" time. It shows the file as being uploaded on: "Tue Nov 30 00:00:00 1999"
>
> Arghh! Why did you choose such a filename? This is the ELOG internal file format, which is YYMMDD_HHMMSS_name.ext.
> For internal reasons (mainly for synchronization) the system checks every file name, and if it contains 6 numbers
> followed by a "_" followed by 6 other numbers it thinks it's a valid date/time and uses that. Your time is however
> 0.0.0000, that's why it gets converted to some date in 1999. Do you absolutely need this functionality? While I can
> easily remove the interpretation of the date, it would break the synchronization functionality and I would have to
> find some other method to pass the file date/time, which would be quite some work. So if it's not too important for
> you, I would like to keep it as it is.
>
Thank you for your response.
I can certainly use another filename, but I'm curious why elog doesn't convert the filename "000000_000000_file.txt" to
"YYMMDD_HHMMSS_000000_000000_file.txt" when it gets uploaded. All other files are automatically prepended with this
string. Manually renaming the file and then editing the elog entry via text editor seems to fix the file.
thanks,
amartin |