ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66424
|
Fri Jun 26 08:15:16 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.6 | Re: attached picture size changed |
weiluo wrote: |
Hello everyone.
Here I found a problem recently with attaching screen-shot to the elog.
I am using "elog -f xxx/xxx.gif" to make elog entry. Recently I found my attached pictures were scaled to the half of the original size horizontally appearing in the log entry, the other half of the picture was filled with black. I need to click it once to magnify the picture to see it.
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? It bugs me a lot.
By the way, I saw some pictures were produced with the name "xxx.gif.png" in the logbook directory.
Thanks, and one of the modified picture is attached.
|
When you submit a picture, elogd calls the ImageMagick package to generate a thumbnail out of it, therefore you get the "xxx.gif.png" file (which represents the thumbnail). If you create your GIF images with the ROOT package, ImageMagick will give problems because ROOT does not use standard GIF encoding, therefor the black border on your pictures. You can turn off the thumbnail generation completely by specifying
Thumbnail size = 0
in the configuration file. This option was just introduced recently, so please update to SVN revision 2227 for this option to work. |
66427
|
Fri Jun 26 17:04:23 2009 |
| weiluo | lwsy711@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 2.7.6 | Re: attached picture size changed |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
weiluo wrote: |
Hello everyone.
Here I found a problem recently with attaching screen-shot to the elog.
I am using "elog -f xxx/xxx.gif" to make elog entry. Recently I found my attached pictures were scaled to the half of the original size horizontally appearing in the log entry, the other half of the picture was filled with black. I need to click it once to magnify the picture to see it.
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? It bugs me a lot.
By the way, I saw some pictures were produced with the name "xxx.gif.png" in the logbook directory.
Thanks, and one of the modified picture is attached.
|
When you submit a picture, elogd calls the ImageMagick package to generate a thumbnail out of it, therefore you get the "xxx.gif.png" file (which represents the thumbnail). If you create your GIF images with the ROOT package, ImageMagick will give problems because ROOT does not use standard GIF encoding, therefor the black border on your pictures. You can turn off the thumbnail generation completely by specifying
Thumbnail size = 0
in the configuration file. This option was just introduced recently, so please update to SVN revision 2227 for this option to work. |
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation! It works! |
1880
|
Sat Jul 15 17:58:46 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.2-1702 | Re: astonished icon |
Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | Hi Stefan,
I've been trying to use the astonished icon, but the preview or entry
display shows only a broken image.
I found in the elogd.c at line 5556 :
{"8o", "<img src=\"%sicons/eek.png\">"}
I copied the "astonished.png" to "eek.png" and it worked.
Is it the reason of the problem ? ?) |
Actually the C code should be "astonished.png" instead of "eek.png". I changed that in revision 1704. BTW, thanks for the Brazilian translation. |
1887
|
Wed Jul 19 15:05:02 2006 |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos | elaine@ccuec.unicamp.br | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.2-1702 | Re: astonished icon |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | Hi Stefan,
I've been trying to use the astonished icon, but the preview or entry
display shows only a broken image.
I found in the elogd.c at line 5556 :
{"8o", "<img src=\"%sicons/eek.png\">"}
I copied the "astonished.png" to "eek.png" and it worked.
Is it the reason of the problem ? ?) |
Actually the C code should be "astonished.png" instead of "eek.png". I changed that in revision 1704. BTW, thanks for the Brazilian translation. |
Thank you for your quick response !
I'm glad to be able to contribute !
Regards,
Elaine |
67453
|
Fri Feb 22 08:19:27 2013 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.92 | Re: any way to undelete entries? |
Mark Bergman wrote: |
Is there any way within eLog to undelete entries?
|
No. |
67454
|
Fri Feb 22 10:58:18 2013 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.92 | Re: any way to undelete entries? |
Mark Bergman wrote: |
Is there any way within eLog to undelete entries?
|
I wrote to scripts to backup the logbook files:
- elog_backup_daily creates a tar file of all new entries of the last 25 hours and keeps these backups for 90 days
- elog_backup_hourly creates a tar file of the entries of the last 65 minutes and keeks these backups for one week
- exclude-logbooks specifies which files not to backup
This allows you at least to recover deleted entries by hand as an administrator.
⇄
Detect language » English
⇄
Detect language » English
⇄
Detect language » English
|
65872
|
Tue May 6 21:47:32 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.3-2058 | Re: any support of encrypted logfiles? |
Bill Pier wrote: |
I'm sure this topic has been visited previously, but a search of this forum didn't show any results.
Is there are support or already proven method of encrypting the logfiles that Elog serves up?
|
There is no native support for encryption inside ELOG, but you can use some external tool to achieve encryption. You can for example use TrueCrypt to mount a virtual encrypted drive, where you store your log files. |
66495
|
Thu Aug 6 08:00:22 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.7.6 | Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items? |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan |