Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 248 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
    icon2.gif   Re: Multi Logook Login, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 15 09:51:35 2009 
 

    
        
            Hal Proctor wrote:
        
        
            
icon5.gif   ROptions value changed in the edit page, posted by Gabriele Sirri on Wed Apr 15 11:43:14 2009 
When ROptions items contain the same substring and this substring is also an ROptions item (ex: notdone, 
done), the value of the entry could change in the edit page. 
It depends on the item order in the config file. 
    icon2.gif   Re: ROptions value changed in the edit page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 15 12:56:18 2009 
> When ROptions items contain the same substring and this substring is also an ROptions item (ex: notdone, 
> done), the value of the entry could change in the edit page. 
> It depends on the item order in the config file. 
    icon2.gif   Re: Multi Logook Login, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Apr 15 14:44:42 2009 
Hi, Stefan!

[quote=Stefan Ritt]If [B]"password file = xxx"[/B] is however in each individual logbooks configuration, then you get [B]"path=/<lobook>"[/B]. You can
icon5.gif   Config so that users can delete only their own entries?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Wed Apr 15 17:57:19 2009 
 I've tried 

Deny_Delete = All
    icon2.gif   Re: Config so that users can delete only their own entries?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 16 08:34:03 2009 
[quote="Dennis Seitz"] I've tried 

Deny_Delete = All
icon3.gif   mail to localhost?, posted by Mike on Fri Apr 17 22:44:58 2009 
Initially I thought you had to specify a port number after localhost for emailing.
As it turns out just putting "localhost" as the email server in the elog config
file works just fine. We have a strange problem where our elog server is running.
    icon2.gif   Re: Config so that users can delete only their own entries?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Sat Apr 18 00:33:53 2009 
Thanks for reminding me of that, it will do fine. A suggestion: Separate Restrict Edit into Restrict Edit and Restrict Delete or some functional equivalent.
Then we have the choice to restrict one or the other or both. Is that worth doing? 
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6