ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68025
|
Mon Jun 15 22:00:40 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Limited access to an attribute |
No.
Michael Cianci wrote: |
Is there a way to limit access to an attribute "Reviewed by" to only supervisors?
Thank you for your help
Mike
|
|
68100
|
Mon Aug 24 20:40:14 2015 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Send e-mail based on a hierarchy of attributes? |
Is there a way to distribute e-mail based on the consideration of several attributes and values? A simple example: attributes type and category have several different values, say, routine and problem for type and hardware and software for category, but one would only like messages sent when there's a problem to different sets of hardware or software types. Thus:
Email
type routine category hardware = no message
category software = no message
type problem category hardware = a@bcd.efg, h@ijk.lmn
category software = 1@opq.rst, 2@uvw.xyz |
68101
|
Wed Aug 26 09:18:17 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Send e-mail based on a hierarchy of attributes? |
Yes, this can be done. See below for an example configuration.
Attributes = entrytype, category
Options entrytype = routine{1}, problem{2}
Options category = software, hardware
{1} Email category software =
{1} Email category hardware =
{2} Email category software = 1@opq.rst, 2@uvw.xyz
{2} Email category hardware = a@bcd.efg, h@ijk.lmn
Phil Rubin wrote: |
Is there a way to distribute e-mail based on the consideration of several attributes and values? A simple example: attributes type and category have several different values, say, routine and problem for type and hardware and software for category, but one would only like messages sent when there's a problem to different sets of hardware or software types. Thus:
Email
type routine category hardware = no message
category software = no message
type problem category hardware = a@bcd.efg, h@ijk.lmn
category software = 1@opq.rst, 2@uvw.xyz
|
|
Draft
|
Wed Sep 2 16:55:00 2015 |
| Mike Bodine | Mike.Bodine@alcatel-lucent.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Copy To Function |
Hi,
We've recently implemented the Copy To function and it works as advertised. The issue we're having is the original entry time is also copied, so if we take an old log and copy it to another log book the entry using reverse sort, preserve = 0 may not display as the newest id. It will receive the next message id, but not display in the correct order on the page. Is there an option or parameter that will force Copy To create a new entry time, so the message id will appear in the correct order?
Thanks,
Mike
|
68108
|
Wed Sep 2 17:06:10 2015 |
| Mike Bodine | Mike.Bodine@alcatel-lucent.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Copy To Function |
Hi,
We've recently implemented the Copy To function and it works as advertised. The issue we're having is the original entry time is also copied, so if we take an old log and copy it to another log book the entry using reverse sort, preserve = 0 may not display as the newest id. It will receive the next message id, but not display in the correct order on the page. Is there an option or parameter that will force Copy To create a new entry time, so the message id will appear in the correct order?
Thanks,
Mike
|
68109
|
Wed Sep 2 17:06:17 2015 |
| Mike Bodine | Mike.Bodine@alcatel-lucent.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Copy To Function |
Hi,
We've recently implemented the Copy To function and it works as advertised. The issue we're having is the original entry time is also copied, so if we take an old log and copy it to another log book the entry using reverse sort, preserve = 0 may not display as the newest id. It will receive the next message id, but not display in the correct order on the page. Is there an option or parameter that will force Copy To create a new entry time, so the message id will appear in the correct order?
Thanks,
Mike
|
68177
|
Tue Nov 3 18:22:33 2015 |
| Nicola | nicolamori@aol.com | Info | Linux | 2.9.2 | WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie |
I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25 2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory
Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks |
68178
|
Wed Nov 4 14:40:39 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie |
Hi Nicola,
this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.
But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".
Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote: |
I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25 2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory
Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks
|
|