Re: Push button for Menue Command, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 7 08:38:57 2006
|
[quote="An Thai"]Dear Stefan,
in your documentation: ELOG - Syntax of elog.cfg I see two screenshots in the Themes section. The left one shows a layout with Push buttons on the Menue |
Re: Proxy question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 21 20:59:26 2005
|
> I'm trying to run elog 2.6.0-beta4 under Apache 2.0. I follow the directions, and everything works fine, so my
> elog runs as
>
|
Re: Proxy Error, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Nov 6 08:11:57 2008
|
Glen MacLachlan wrote:
|
Re: Proxy Error, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Jan 13 11:15:10 2010
|
> Having made one entry in the thread about message ID, I could neither edit the entry or add an additional reply
> without getting "Proxy Error" messages. I've had this trouble on this forum before, a long time ago. Perhaps
> it is connected with the html coding?
|
Re: Proxy Error, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Jan 13 11:17:39 2010
|
> > Having made one entry in the thread about message ID, I could neither edit the entry or add an additional reply
> > without getting "Proxy Error" messages. I've had this trouble on this forum before, a long time ago. Perhaps
> > it is connected with the html coding?
|
Re: Proxy Error, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Jan 13 11:19:59 2010
|
> > > Having made one entry in the thread about message ID, I could neither edit the entry or add an additional reply
> > > without getting "Proxy Error" messages. I've had this trouble on this forum before, a long time ago. Perhaps
> > > it is connected with the html coding?
|
Re: Proxy Error, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 13 11:34:51 2010
|
> I only got one email in response to the second entry of this thread, no email was received after the edit of the entry. The
> next email received was due to the third entry of this thread.
|
Re: Proxy Error, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 13 11:39:23 2010
|
> > I only got one email in response to the second entry of this thread, no email was received after the edit of the entry. The
> > next email received was due to the third entry of this thread.
>
|