Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 357 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  67035   Wed Mar 30 10:46:58 2011 Question Ma Qiumeimaqm@ihep.ac.cnQuestionLinux2.9.0-2402Why the password file can have several same username?

 In the password file, I see several same username, such as:

<user>

    <name>test</name>

    <password encoding="SHA256">iXhH.</password>

    <full_name>test me</full_name>

    <last_logout>Tue Apr 14 14:12:44 2009</last_logout>

    <last_activity>Wed May 19 09:39:32 2010</last_activity>

    <email>maqm@ihep.ac.cn</email>

    <email_notify/>

  </user> 

 

 

<user>

    <name>test</name>

    <password encoding="SHA256">iXhH.</password>

    <full_name>test me</full_name>

   <last_logout>0</last_logout>

    <last_activity>0</last_activity>

      <inactive>0</inactive>

    <email>maqm@ihep.ac.cn</email>

    <email_notify/>

  </user> 

 

 

<user>

    <name>test</name>

    <password encoding="SHA256">iXhH.</password>

    <full_name>test me</full_name>

    <last_logout>0</last_logout>

    <last_activity>0</last_activity>

      <inactive>0</inactive>

    <email>maqm@ihep.ac.cn</email>

       <email_notify/>

  </user> 

 

I don't know the reason why eLog can have the same username.

And what should I do to prevent these things happen?

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

  67037   Fri Apr 1 09:17:20 2011 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.9.0-2402Re: Why the password file can have several same username?

Ma Qiumei wrote:

I don't know the reason why eLog can have the same username.

And what should I do to prevent these things happen? 

Thanks for reporting that bug. It has been fixed in SVN revision 2404.  

  67041   Fri Apr 1 16:13:44 2011 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chCommentLinux2.9.0-2402Re: Authentication error message

soren poulsen wrote:

It is very good to have Kerberos authentication available. It is just the error message which is a bit cryptic.

If you enter your Kerberos password once, and later fail to authenticate with a wrong password, you get:

Kerberos error:
Decrypt integrity check failed.
Please check your Kerberos configuration

 

That is not really urgent!


Soren

 

Can you tell me how to reproduce this? If I do it here, I just get back to the login page:

Capture019.png

Maybe it has to do with your specific Kerberos implementation? What server are you using?

 

  67046   Mon Apr 11 19:31:23 2011 Reply soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chCommentLinux2.9.0-2402Re: Authentication error message

Stefan Ritt wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

It is very good to have Kerberos authentication available. It is just the error message which is a bit cryptic.

If you enter your Kerberos password once, and later fail to authenticate with a wrong password, you get:

Kerberos error:
Decrypt integrity check failed.
Please check your Kerberos configuration

 

That is not really urgent!


Soren

 

Can you tell me how to reproduce this? If I do it here, I just get back to the login page:

Capture019.png

Maybe it has to do with your specific Kerberos implementation? What server are you using?

 

 I am sorry but I cannot reproduce this any more. It happened several times when I was testing different kinds of wrong user input to the authentication dialog but now there is no issue any longer. However, there has been other issues lately in this domain and it may be that the Kerberos installation has been patched by our automatic update installation.

Case closed! Thanks anyway for responding.

Soren

  67057   Thu Apr 28 11:20:40 2011 Question Wolfgang Bayerw.bayer@gsi.deQuestionWindows2.9.0-2396Options <...> vs ROptions <...>

According to section "Syntax of elogd.cfg" of the "Administrator's Guide" Options <attribute> = <list> and  ROptions <attribute> = <list> should be the same. But there is a litle difference, because choosing an entry of the Options-pull-down menu causes a reload of the entry mask while choosing a ROption-radio-button the entry mask is not reloaded. This causes a problem using conditional attributes. The condition is only paid attention to in case of Options but not in case of ROptions. In my case I would like to use ROption, as it is faster to set a radio button than to choose an item in a pull-down menu, but I can't as I have also to use conditional attributes. Is there any solution?

  67058   Fri Apr 29 11:20:50 2011 Question Wolfgang Bayerw.bayer@gsi.deRequestWindows2.9.0-2396Filter on attribute value for list items

Hello @all,

for a logbook I have also to set up a guest access. As I want to have a login page first opening the logbook,  I created a second logbook entry in the elog.cfg that points to the same subdir as the original logbook. The idea of this guest access is, that users who have no login rights can read selected items with selected attributes. Therefor I restricted the guest account with all available "Guest"-commands in the elog.cfg.

But this is not sufficient. Let's suppose I have an attribute called 'Accessibility' with options 'public' and 'private'. What I am searching for is a filter command for the list display, i.e. if an entry has the accessibility flag 'public', a guest sees this entry in the list and can access it. But if the entry has the accessibility flag private, the entry should not be displayed for guests but for users, that are logged in.

I read the administrator guide carefully, but I didn't found a command that provides for that. Does such a filtering command for the list exist? If not, is it possible to implement one?


 

Best regards,

Wolfgang Bayer

  67064   Tue May 3 20:05:29 2011 Question Andreas Warburtonandreas.warburton@gmail.comQuestionLinux | Mac OSX2.9.0-2396Unwanted faux DST date shifts to time stamps in mirror transactions

 Hi,

I have a MacOSX 10.6.7 laptop that periodically synchronizes my logbook with that on a Debian linux web server.  Both instances of ELOG are 2.9.0-2396.

When I create a new entry on the laptop, the indicated time stamp is correct.  When I click Synchronize on the laptop, the entry that gets mirrored to the Debian server has a time stamp exactly one hour earlier (in the past) on the Debian side.

Likewise, when I create a new entry on the Debian server, the indicated time stamp is correct.  When I click Synchronize on the laptop, the entry that gets mirrored from the Debian machine to the laptop has a time stamp that is exactly one hour in the future on the laptop.

This appears to be due to an incorrect handling of times with regard to "summer" (daylight savings) and "standard" time when mirroring between these two different machines.

Is there a straightforward workaround to immunize against this sensitivity?

Thanks!

Andreas

 

  67160   Wed Jan 11 22:19:49 2012 Warning Allenbastss@rit.eduBug reportWindows2.9.0-2396Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7

After patching a windows 7 computer with MS12-006, can no longer connect to elog, get page cannot be displayed

See

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6