I have attached a possible patch--basically pirated from elogd.c  Because strlcpy needed for the crypt cares about size, do_crypt needed the size, which had not been a concern for base64_encode in elog.c   As a result, base64_encode changed slightly as well.  I think the implementation places a limit of 32 characters on passwords, which seemed to already be the limit in elogd.c  The elog.c limit appeared to be 80 characters.  I tested both SSL and SSL+CRYPT for commandline elog entries with both a logbook specific write password as well as username/password combo in a password file.

AJC

I am in the process of setting up a new ELOG logbook.  I checked out rev2280 from svn.savannah.psi.ch.  I knew I wanted to encrypt passwords, so when I compiled, I used flags

USE_SSL=1

and

USE_CRYPT=1

I am running Red Hat enterprise linux 3, glibc-devel-2.3.2-95.50, openssl-devel-0.9.7a-33.25

Everything seemed to be working fine--I was able to set up logbooks using both a password file as well as write passwords and make entries to the logs.  Then I tried to use the command line 'elog' to make an entry which failed to both logbooks.

/opt/elog/pro/elogd -c /opt/elog/pro/dansce_fancy.cfg -l Demo1 -w <mypassword>

Would change the password in dansce_fancy.cfg and I could make entries through the web interface, but

elog -h acouture -s -p 8081 -w <mypassword> -l Demo1 -a Author="Aaron Couture" -a Type=Routine  -m Sampleinfo.txt -x -n 1

failed with

Error: Invalid user name or password

I got the same behaviour when I used a logbook with a user/password pair defined in a password file.

When I looked at the output from running elogd with the -v flag, I could see that everything was being received on the server side, but that the password did not agree with the write password in dansce_fancy.cfg

I then recompiled elog with

USE_SSL=1

USE_CRYPT=

And then the elog command line entries worked, both with write passwords and a password file (after recreating the password file and the write password).  Looking at the elog.c source code, it appears that it does not know to use crypt rather then base64_encode when USE_CRYPT is true.  elogd.c defined different behaviour if USE_CRYPT is defined.

Thanks,

Aaron Couture

I have attached a possible patch--basically pirated from elogd.c  Because strlcpy needed for the crypt cares about size, do_crypt needed the size, which had not been a concern for base64_encode in elog.c   As a result, base64_encode changed slightly as well.  I think the implementation places a limit of 32 characters on passwords, which seemed to already be the limit in elogd.c  The elog.c limit appeared to be 80 characters.  I tested both SSL and SSL+CRYPT for commandline elog entries with both a logbook specific write password as well as username/password combo in a password file.

Hi,

This little logbook has a problem:

------------------------

Attributes = Author, Category, Type, Subject, Number

Type Number = numeric

Options Category = General{1}
{1} Options Type = Routine

------------------------

(it was of course more complicated to start with).

When creating a new entry and selecting the Category option, there is a problem with the JavaScript which will populate the Type option.

To avoid the problem, I just comment out the line "Type Number ... "

Is this a bug ?

Thanks for your time

Soren

(P.S. Using a reserved name as an attribute name is maybe not optimal, but it does not seem to be the  problem).

 To overcome this problem it is sufficient to switch language from "Language = french" to "Language = english"

It was a mistake not to include the "global" settings in this bug report.

What probably happens is that something in the French translation (accents ?) disturbs the java scripting.

Soren

 To use "Language = french" it is necessary to remove or substitute the accent character ' with something else in eloglang.french and then the Javascript code works again.

Soren

Indeed it was the JavaScript line

if (document.form1.Number.value != '- garder les valeurs d'origine -') {

which caused the trouble.  The "'" character closed the string '- garder les valeurs d', which caused an exception. I changed it to

if (document.form1.Number.value != "- garder les valeurs d'origine -") {

and now it should work fine.