Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 362 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
    icon7.gif   Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 10:39:00 2005 
> Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> as soon as it is accessed.
    icon4.gif   Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 10:51:10 2005 
> > When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> > display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
> > 
    icon7.gif   Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:00:59 2005 
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
    icon7.gif   Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:01:06 2005 
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
    icon7.gif   Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 11:28:13 2005 
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
    icon7.gif   Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 11:47:58 2005 
> Logins work OK if the username/password is valid.  However, if I try to login
> with invalid authentication, the server crashes.  If I turn off the protect
> selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
    icon7.gif   Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 12:09:55 2005 
> > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid.  However, if I try to login
> > with invalid authentication, the server crashes.  If I turn off the protect
> > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
    icon14.gif   Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 12:26:46 2005 
> > It seems to work nice to me.
> > Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> > example for all allowed parameters in the distributed  /etc/default/elog
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6