Re: reverse sort option does not work for quick filter, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jun 4 12:21:21 2005
|
Heiko Scheit wrote: | The 'reverse sort' option does not work for quick filter searches. In the
URL there is always written 'reverse=0'. For normal 'Find' it works OK. |
I don't understand the problem. If I take the example elogd.cfg from the distribution, it sorts in reverse order, since the file contains Reverse sort=1. If I apply a quick filter, the result is still sorted in reverse order (entry ID from high to low). If I set Reverse sort=0, the even after applying a quick filter, the entries are sorted with their ID from low to high. Applying a quick filter should not put a reverse=0 into the URL, so it's strange to me where this comes from. Can you try to reproduce the problem with the demo elogd.cfg? |
Re: elog crashes when admin tries to register new users, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jun 4 12:25:57 2005
|
Heiko Scheit wrote: | When pasting the URL for the registration of new users (with 'Self register = 3') elog
crashes with segmentation fault. I don't have the time currently to give you more
debuging information but maybe you can have a look the same. It crashes after
the user is registered. The Email is sent, too. |
I cannot reproduce this problem either. The only difference I see is that I use thunderbird as my email client, where I don't have to copy/paste the activation URL into my browser, but just click on it. If maybe the copy/paste operation adds an additional CR/LF or so, that could be a problem. Can you check again? A stack trace of the crashed elogd would help as well. |
Re: reverse sort option does not work for quick filter, posted by Heiko Scheit on Sat Jun 4 16:37:04 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Heiko Scheit"]The 'reverse sort' option does not work for quick filter searches.
In the
URL there is always written 'reverse=0'. For normal 'Find' it works OK.[/quote]
I don't understand the problem. If I take the example elogd.cfg from the distribution, it sorts in reverse
order, since the file contains [i]Reverse sort=1[/i]. If I apply a quick filter, the result is still sorted in
reverse order (entry ID from high to low). If I set [i]Reverse sort=0[/i], the even after applying a quick
filter, the entries are sorted with their ID from low to high. Applying a quick filter should not put a
[i]reverse=0[/i] into the URL, so it's strange to me where this comes from. Can you try to reproduce the problem
with the demo elogd.cfg?[/quote]
I played with the quick filter settings somewhat. Here is what I get.
I can't really make sense of it, but maybe you can figure out what
happens. Below, the first line always contains the 'Quick filter'
config setting. The lines below show the URL after searching with the
quick filter for the 1st, 2nd,... attribute listed in the quick filter
setting. (The common base of the URL was removed. Shown is
everything after the last '/'.) Each 'quick search' was started from
the 'List' or 'Back' page, i.e. the URL ended with a '/'.
As you can see below the result depends on the number and on the order
(!) of the attributes. Only a few give the desired result (marked
with # OK). Incidentally the option 'Date, Something' works fine,
which is the combination found in the demo config file. :)
Quick filter = Subject, Date, Login
?Subject=sd&Login= # OK
?last=1&&reverse=0
?Login=sdf&reverse=0
Quick filter = Subject, Login, Date
?Subject=scd&reverse=0
?Login=sdf&reverse=0
?last=1&reverse=0
Quick filter = Date, Subject, Login
?last=1&&reverse=0
?Subject=sd&Login= # OK
?Login=sd&reverse=0
Quick filter = Subject, Date
?Subject=sd # OK
?last=1&reverse=0
Quick filter = Date, Subject
?last=1&Subject= # OK
?Subject=ddsd # OK
Quick filter = Login, Date
?Login=sch # OK
?last=31&reverse=0
Quick filter = Subject, Login
?Subject=dsd&Login= # OK
?Login=sd&reverse=0
Quick filter = Login, Subject
?Login=sd&Subject= # OK
?Subject=sd&reverse=0 |
shell exec not working, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Jun 6 12:25:53 2005
|
It seems that, since Fri 2005-06-03, 12:50 almost, the shell exec feature is not invoked anymore.
the -x flag is present in the command line and the elog.cfg Parameters are present both for edit and for insert..
I'm not disabling shell exec by the checkbox
the dummy-level log in syslog does not show *anything* about shell exec. |
Re: shell exec not working, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Jun 6 12:43:48 2005
|
Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | It seems that, since Fri 2005-06-03, 12:50 almost, the shell exec feature is not invoked anymore.
the -x flag is present in the command line and the elog.cfg Parameters are present both for edit and for insert..
I'm not disabling shell exec by the checkbox
the dummy-level log in syslog does not show *anything* about shell exec. |
oh my @#[#@ .. sorry stefan, my bad ... for some reason the make_thumbs script was not +x ..
Is it possible to check the executability of the script in elog and eventually tell about this in syslog ? |
Omitting some fields in e-mail, posted by Michael Husbyn on Tue Jun 7 10:59:20 2005
|
Hello,
Is there a way to include some attribute fields in the e-mail from eLog, but not all?
E.g, if you have the following:
Attributes = TA, Endret, UA, Pri, Status, Oppdragsgiver, EpostTil, EpostIKT, Tittel
Then you get the heading:
Logbook :
TA :
Endret :
UA :
Pri :
Status :
Oppdragsgiver :
EpostTil :
EpostIKT :
Tittel :
(removed the attribute data),
But I would like to send out only:
UA :
Pri :
Status :
Oppdragsgiver :
EpostTil :
Tittel :
Any way to do this in the current version?
And perhaps change the order too... I'm asking for much perhaps?
Best regards
Michael |
Menu text ignored??, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Jun 7 15:48:53 2005
|
I tried to insert a row in the menu but it seems to totally ignore the command ...
both inserting a filename and simply typeing "Menu text = <b>PIPPO</b>" brings to a page with *no* "PIPPO" in the HTML source ...
is this a bug or another my misconfiguration??? |
Unable to send mails through elog, posted by Kumar on Wed Jun 8 10:45:18 2005
|
Hi All
I need to send mail through Elog. With Version 2.5.7 it seems to work only when less content is in the elog entry. But when I fill in a lot of content into one entry, it confirms the mail is sent but I dont receive the mail.
I thought it was a bug in 2.5.7, so I installed the new version 2.6-beta. With this version I am not even able to send any mail eventhough elog confirms it has been sent. Same is it case for 2.5.9.
Please let me know if there is a fix..
Thanks
Raj |
|