Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 371 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  67560   Wed Sep 4 11:48:55 2013 Question Mark CampbellCAMP2MAR@police.nsw.gov.auQuestionWindows2.9-2475How to remove "Remove user" button ?

Is there a way to remove the "Remove user" button from non-Amin users config page?

 

BTW Stefan ELOG is a Great Solution!

Thanks

Mark. 

  67561   Thu Sep 5 11:20:41 2013 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chQuestionWindows2.9-2475Re: How to remove "Remove user" button ?

Mark Campbell wrote:

Is there a way to remove the "Remove user" button from non-Amin users config page?

BTW Stefan ELOG is a Great Solution!

Thanks Mark. 

Hi Mark,
I've had a quick look in the code: currently it is not possible to remove the "Remove user" button.
But a non-admin user would only be able to remove his own user account. Shouldn't a user have the ability to remove his own account?
 
Detect language » English
 

 

Andreas

 

 

Andreas

  67562   Thu Sep 5 12:56:37 2013 Reply Mark CampbellCAMP2MAR@police.nsw.gov.auQuestionWindows2.9-2475Re: How to remove "Remove user" button ?

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

Mark Campbell wrote:

Is there a way to remove the "Remove user" button from non-Amin users config page?

BTW Stefan ELOG is a Great Solution!

Thanks Mark. 

Hi Mark,
I've had a quick look in the code: currently it is not possible to remove the "Remove user" button.
But a non-admin user would only be able to remove his own user account. Shouldn't a user have the ability to remove his own account?
 
Detect language » English
 

 

Andreas

 

 

Andreas

 Hi Andreas,

we would prefer only admin users to be able to remove user accounts.

I have just tested the Remove user command with a regular user account and get this error " Error: Command "Remove user" not allowed" so it looks like users can't remove their own account, so that is OK.

 

Thanks

Mark.

  67149   Fri Nov 11 17:44:45 2011 Question Hung Daohungtdao@yahoo.comQuestionWindows2.9My current Elog works fine with v2.6 but not 2.9

I have been using v2.6.  I works fine so far for what I need except that I could not disable the attachments in the notification emails.  Now I need to upgrade to a latest version v2.9.  However, with this latest version, I've received this error when navigate pages:  "Error: Too many parameters (> 120). Cannot perform operation".   What does this error mean?  Should I do to fix it?  I also have tested other version 2.7 and 2.8 as well.  The problem exists.

  67155   Fri Dec 16 18:28:58 2011 Question Hung Daohungtdao@yahoo.comQuestionWindows2.9Build with Visual Studio 2010?

First I have tried to checkout the source code and got an error shown in below.  So, I clicked on the Web Access link to download the trunk.tar.gz.  I have opened elogd.sln in Visual Studio 2010.  Despite of downloading openssl and and installing krb5, I still received errors related to header files that could not be opened or found.  Has anyone checked out all files from trunk.tar.gz and built successfully.  Any hint or advise prior to build this elogd solution in VS2010 will be highly appreciated. 

>svn checkout svn+ssh://svn@savannah.psi.ch/repos/meg/elog/trunk elog
svn: E720002: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn+ssh://svn@savannah.psi.ch/repo
s/meg/elog/trunk'
svn: E720002: Can't create tunnel: The system cannot find the file specified.

  67157   Mon Dec 19 13:10:27 2011 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.9Re: My current Elog works fine with v2.6 but not 2.9

Hung Dao wrote:

I have been using v2.6.  I works fine so far for what I need except that I could not disable the attachments in the notification emails.  Now I need to upgrade to a latest version v2.9.  However, with this latest version, I've received this error when navigate pages:  "Error: Too many parameters (> 120). Cannot perform operation".   What does this error mean?  Should I do to fix it?  I also have tested other version 2.7 and 2.8 as well.  The problem exists.

Maybe you have indeed too many options in your configuration file. Can you please post it here or send it to my privately so that I can have a look?

- Stefan 

  67180   Thu Feb 2 16:51:32 2012 Question Kenneth Nielsenk.nielsen81@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.9Migrate to elog

Hallo and thanks for a great program.

At my work we have previously been using another program (Rednotebook) for our lab journals, but now we wish to migrate to elog because it is more configurable and because it runs in a browser.

We would off course like to move all of our old log entries with us. Luckily Rednotebook uses a standard module (YAML) for data storage, so I can easily access the data (e.g. with python) and I have already done do, and I have exchanged the native markup with html.

Now I would prefer it if I can make the elog data files directly, in stead of using the elog command, because that makes it possible and easy to revert the change, and also to not have to handle escaping html string before feeding them to elog on the commandline. I have actually already written the program that produces the elog data files, but now I have a few questions:

1) Is there an overall way of validating the datafiles, to make sure elog doesn't choke on them at some point in the future when I try to open one of the old entries. Along the same lines, does elog parse all the files when the demon is started, so if it starts then I'm ok?

2) What exactly are the requirements for the HTML content

2a) Will any valid html do, or are there some speciel requirements (e.g. like   at blank lines)

2b) Does it require a particular version of html, because then I could at least validate it against that doctype beforehand

3) Is there a log from elog where I can see if it encounters something it doesn't like?

I hope the you can answer some of my questions.

Regards Kenneth

  67331   Fri Sep 7 18:19:38 2012 Question Garret Delarondegarret.delaronde@gmail.comBug reportWindows2.9Type <attribute> = Date - Issue

 I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.

I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work. 

Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.

We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.

Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).

However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.

Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?

Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6