Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 387 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  66347   Wed May 6 15:30:24 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionAll2.7.6Re: Office 2007 file attachments download as zip due to mime config
Rich Sterling wrote:

Are there any plans to add the new mime extensions to the elogd.c source? (Instead of forcing users to use FireFox or Right click, save-as and rename?

 

 Ok, I added the MIME extensions in ELOG Rev. 2196. The forum runs already the updated version, so can you try with the demo attachments from your entry?

  66355   Thu May 7 13:35:32 2009 Reply Rich Sterlingrbsterli@juno.comQuestionAll2.7.6Re: Office 2007 file attachments download as zip due to mime config

Stefan Ritt wrote:
Rich Sterling wrote:

Are there any plans to add the new mime extensions to the elogd.c source? (Instead of forcing users to use FireFox or Right click, save-as and rename?

 

 Ok, I added the MIME extensions in ELOG Rev. 2196. The forum runs already the updated version, so can you try with the demo attachments from your entry?

 It looks good from here!  Thanks!!

Best Regards,

Rich

  66473   Tue Jul 28 16:57:39 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.6r2233Re: Odd problem (bug?) with certain attribute

T. Ribbrock wrote:

I have the following simple test logbook:

; General
List display = Edit, Hostname, OS, Size
Entries per page = 150
Quick filter = OS
Date Format = %d/%m/%Y
Summary Lines = 0

; Attributes
Attributes = Hostname, OS, CPU,Size
Required Attributes = Hostname
Sort Attributes = Hostname

; Message part: log is text only, but elog is allowed
Default encoding = 0
Allowed encoding = 2

For some strange reasons, I'm having problems with the "Size" attribute, which I have added later. If I start adding/editing entries, at some point, the "Size" attribute will stay at "0" and will not accept any further changes. I've tried to pare down the config to maybe find which statement could be causing this, but to no avail. The only thing I can say is taht id doesn not seem to happen if the configuration consist of the sole line

Attributes = Hostname, OS, CPU,Size

I'm quite puzzled as to what is going on here (the original problems stems from a more complicated logbook) - I'm not even 100% sure whether this happens due to a bug or not.

That's indeed a strange bug, and thanks to your detailed explanation I could easily reproduce it. The problem was that in the ELCode toolbar there is already a "SIZE" parameter, which gets submitted instead of your "size" attribute. Therefore whatever you submit as "size", gets replaced by zero (since the SIZE drop-down box usually sits at zero). So you can either go and change your "size" attribute into someting else like "Memory Size", or you upgrade to version 2244, where I fixed this problem.

  66474   Tue Jul 28 17:10:13 2009 Reply T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportLinux2.7.6r2233Re: Odd problem (bug?) with certain attribute

Stefan Ritt wrote:

That's indeed a strange bug, and thanks to your detailed explanation I could easily reproduce it. The problem was that in the ELCode toolbar there is already a "SIZE" parameter, which gets submitted instead of your "size" attribute. Therefore whatever you submit as "size", gets replaced by zero (since the SIZE drop-down box usually sits at zero). So you can either go and change your "size" attribute into someting else like "Memory Size", or you upgrade to version 2244, where I fixed this problem.

 Very nice, thank you! Given that I also still have to test the fix you made for the crash problem with "shared" logbooks (I assume it's also present in 2244), I'll upgrade and report back (probably tomorrow).

  66482   Wed Jul 29 13:23:41 2009 Agree T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportLinux2.7.6r2233Re: Odd problem (bug?) with certain attribute

T. Ribbrock wrote:

 Very nice, thank you! Given that I also still have to test the fix you made for the crash problem with "shared" logbooks (I assume it's also present in 2244), I'll upgrade and report back (probably tomorrow).

 2244 is now running, and indeed, the "Size" attribute works now. Thank you!

  67011   Mon Feb 7 15:14:36 2011 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportOther2.9.0-2384Re: Odd bug with conditional and required attributes

T. Ribbrock wrote:

I just ran into an odd bug with conditional attributes: If I add a certain attribute to "Required Attributes", none of the conditionals will work anymore. I have tried to create a small logbook definition that will demonstrate the problem (the original logbook is more complex and uses two sets of conditionals, both of which will be disabled when the bug hits):

; General settings
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Duplicate, Delete, Reply, Select, Move to, Download, Find, Logout, Help, Config,Admin
List Menu commands = New, Select, Find, Logout, Help, Config, Admin, Import, Download
Date Format = %d/%m/%Y
List conditions = 1
List display = Edit, Type, Created, StatusA, StatusB, Archived, Test Text, Public?

; Attributes
Attributes = Type, Created, StatusA, StatusB, Archived, Test Text, Public?
Required Attributes = Type

; Attribute Types
Type Created = date
Type Archived = date

; Options & Tooltips
Options Type = Type1{0}, Type2{1}
Options StatusA = Status-A-red, Status-A-orange, Status-A
Options StatusB = Status-B-red, Status-B-orange, Status-B
Options Public? = yes,no

; Conditionals
{0}Show Attributes Edit = Type, Created, StatusA, StatusB, Archived, Test Text, Public?
{1}Show Attributes Edit = Type, Created, StatusA, Archived, Test Text, Public?

The above logbook definition works. However, if I replace the Required Attributes = Type with Required Attributes = Type, Public?, the conditionals will no longer work. I can see the difference in the reactions of the browser - with the extra attribute, nothing happens when I change "Type". Without, the browser will spring into action and reload as soon as I change "Type". I've tested this with both Firefox 3.6.13 and Konqueror 4.4.5 on Kubuntu 10.04 as clients. Fortunately, this is not a showstopper for me, as it is not mandatory to have this attribute defined as required, but I find it a weird issue nonetheless.

Cheerio,

Thomas

P.S.: I'm currently running the latest SVN version of elogd on OPenBSD as I ran into the same problem as described in Message 66984. The above problem also happens with the 2.8.1 I was using before. Some feedback: The SVN version compiled and ran without any further intervention on OpenBSD - very nice!

Your problem is the "?" in the attribute Public?.  Attributes may only contain ordinary characters. Unfortunately I did not document this so far. Therefore I put some fix in SVN revision 2387 which allows your attribute Public?, but I'm not 100% sure if this works in all places. The safest is just to remove the question mark.

  67013   Mon Feb 7 17:26:26 2011 Reply T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportOther2.9.0-2384Re: Odd bug with conditional and required attributes

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Your problem is the "?" in the attribute Public?.  Attributes may only contain ordinary characters. Unfortunately I did not document this so far. Therefore I put some fix in SVN revision 2387 which allows your attribute Public?, but I'm not 100% sure if this works in all places. The safest is just to remove the question mark.

 Thanks Stefan, I'll try that. It's strange, though: At work, we're running 2.7.6 (and have used older versions in the past) and we have several logbooks with each at least one or two attributes with '?' and never had a problem with conditionals. Hence my surprise when this suddenly hit me with 2.8.1+ at home. Removing the '?' would be quite some work, as I'd have to change all logbooks and the associated data (the latter could probably be done with "rpl", I hope). I'll think about it.

  67863   Thu Apr 23 15:13:06 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux3.1.0 c701Re: Odd behaviour when attaching a file to an entry

This problem has been fixed in Version 3.1.0-2. Please upgrade.

David Pilgram wrote:

Having installed v3.1.0 on a test logbook, I find that I can browse and select a file, but when I click on the "Upload" button, I get a pop-up message from the browser asking me:

"This page is asking you to confirm that you want to leave - data you have entered may not be saved."

 

The stay on page does nothing, the leave page option does what one expects from elog - that is the attachment thumbnail is generated etc. 

I guess this is something to do with the drag and drop feature, but wondered if others have this issue or whether it may just be some mystery setting of the browser (firefox).

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6