| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66670
|
Tue Jan 12 09:12:28 2010 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | Re: Collapse to Last and Quick Filter | > Hello,
> I feel that the filter result could be confusing and unexpected when "COLLAPSE TO LAST" is enabled: you
> filter the first entry but you show the last one. What is filtered doesn't correspond with what is shown (look
> the attached example).
>
> I suggest to implement an option to let the user decide which entry (first or last) should be retrieved for
> filtering (a tentative patch is attached).
>
> Thank you
>
> Gabriele
>
> P.S. A similar behaviour occurs when you sort the logbook: it could appear as not sorted because you sort the
> first entry but the last one is shown.
You are absolutely right. When doing filtering, entries shown or not shown have not much to do with the filter.
Rather than messing around with first and last entries, I decided to break apart threads completely when doing
filtering, so the entries are treated as individual entries, just like what you do when filtering in summary mode.
This gives then consistent filtering results. The modification is done in revision 2282. |
|
66685
|
Thu Jan 14 16:43:16 2010 |
 | deletoille | xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | quick filter |
Hello,
We would like to use more the quick filter command on attributes.
On the other hand, when we use it, the result does not displaying entries which are in answer of another attribute. Is there a command which allow that possibility like when we select display full entries in the search mode?
Thanks in advance
Xavier
|
|
66686
|
Thu Jan 14 16:44:49 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | Re: quick filter |
| deletoille wrote: |
|
Hello,
We would like to use more the quick filter command on attributes.
On the other hand, when we use it, the result does not displaying entries which are in answer of another attribute. Is there a command which allow that possibility like when we select display full entries in the search mode?
Thanks in advance
Xavier
|
I don't understand your questions. Can you please give an example. |
|
66687
|
Thu Jan 14 17:14:21 2010 |
| deletoille | xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | Re: quick filter |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| deletoille wrote: |
|
Hello,
We would like to use more the quick filter command on attributes.
On the other hand, when we use it, the result does not displaying entries which are in answer of another attribute. Is there a command which allow that possibility like when we select display full entries in the search mode?
Thanks in advance
Xavier
|
I don't understand your questions. Can you please give an example.
|
Sorry for my english. In fact, i found the answer by myself. But I ll explain to you.
in attachement 1, a small part of our ELOG. When I choose FBT in the quick filter "groupe incriminé". Elog respond that there is no entrie found (attachement 2)
But, with the find function, when i select display full entries and FBT in "groupe incriminé", Elog show the entrie ( attachement 3).
I found the answer. In fact, Elog respond no entrie when threaded is selected. I have to choose Full or summary for that working.
sorry
Xavier
|
| Attachment 1: exemple_1.JPG
|
|
| Attachment 2: exemple_2.JPG
|
|
| Attachment 3: Exemple_3.JPG
|
|
|
66688
|
Thu Jan 14 18:55:12 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | Re: quick filter |
| deletoille wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| deletoille wrote: |
|
Hello,
We would like to use more the quick filter command on attributes.
On the other hand, when we use it, the result does not displaying entries which are in answer of another attribute. Is there a command which allow that possibility like when we select display full entries in the search mode?
Thanks in advance
Xavier
|
I don't understand your questions. Can you please give an example.
|
Sorry for my english. In fact, i found the answer by myself. But I ll explain to you.
in attachement 1, a small part of our ELOG. When I choose FBT in the quick filter "groupe incriminé". Elog respond that there is no entrie found (attachement 2)
But, with the find function, when i select display full entries and FBT in "groupe incriminé", Elog show the entrie ( attachement 3).
I found the answer. In fact, Elog respond no entrie when threaded is selected. I have to choose Full or summary for that working.
sorry
Xavier
|
Actually what you report is a bug. The filtering does not work in threaded display mode, only in summary and full. I fixed that bug in the current SVN version, so if you download and compile it, you can give it a try. The fix will be contained in the next official release. |
|
66706
|
Tue Feb 9 18:49:10 2010 |
| FX FRERE | fxfrere@neuf.fr | Question | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | could not get the threaded display working | Hi,
I have been trying to get the display mode into threaded by default, it does not work on any of my logbooks. I saw related threads in this forum but none gave me a solution (unless the 2.7.8-2282 is available for download).
Here is a simple example which i can not get working.
thanks for your help
FX |
| Attachment 1: elogd.cfg
|
[global]
Welcome Title =
<div style="text-align: center;">log-book.</div>
; Se puede poner un vinculo havcia un sitio web y cambiar la imagen
; Esta imagen debe encontrarse en el directorio \ELOG\themes\default
Title image = <img border=0 src="logo.gif">
; Para mas seguridad se puede cambiar el puerto de ELOG
port = 2
;Uso de https para la connexion
SSL = 1
; Se debe reemplazar estos datos con los datos del servidor de mail de la empresa si se debe (o quiere) mandar emails
SMTP host = toto.com
Language = spanish
Main Tab = Accueil
Bottom text = <div style="text-align: center;">Elog backups <img src="logo.png"></div>
Email format = 111
logfile = Archivo_de_logs.txt
Logging level = 2
;Display mode = threaded
; Los usuarios deben crear una cuenta para poder utilizar la nueva herramienta
Password file = Usuarios.txt
Self register = 2
; La contraseña nominal es: admin, se puede cambiar si necesario
Admin user = administrador
; Si se quiere restringir los derechos de delete
Allow Delete = administrador
; Si se quiere restringir los derechos de modificacion
; Allow Edit = administrador
; Si se quiere restringir los derechos de créacion
; Allow New = administrador
Menu commands = List, Find, New, Delete, Reply, Logout, Help
List Menu commands = Find, New, Logout, Help
Guest Menu commands = List, Find, Login, Help
Guest List Menu commands = Find, Login, Help
[Backups del sistema]
Theme = default
Comment = test backup - Logbook Program
Welcome title = <img src="logo.gif"><p><font size=5 color=white>Welcome to our Elog</font>
Attributes = Usuario, Tarea, Fecha Operacion, Status, Subsistema, Base de Datos
IOptions Status= "Delete-icon.png", "Check-icon.png"
Icon comment Delete-icon.png = Failed
Icon comment Check-icon.png = OK
Thread Icon = Status
Thread Display = $Fecha Operacion,$Tarea,$Subsistema
Locked Attributes = Usuario
Required Attributes = Usuario, Tarea, Fecha Operacion, Status, Subsistema, Base de Datos
Preset Usuario = $long_name
Options Tarea = Backup, Restore
Options Subsistema = DBMGR {a}, MCH {b}, ALL {c}
{a}MOptions Base de Datos = ALL BASES, base1, base2, base3, base4
{b}MOptions Base de Datos = ALL, BD1, BD2, BD3
{c} Locked Attributes = Usuario
{c} Show Attributes Edit= Usuario, Tarea, Fecha Operacion, Status, Subsistema
{c} Required Attributes = Usuario, Tarea, Fecha Operacion, Status, Subsistema
Message comment = Commentarios:
Type Fecha Operacion = date
Preset Fecha Operacion = $date
Mode commands = 1
Display Mode = threaded
Page Title = Backups del sistema - $subject
;Reverse sort = 1
;Quick filter = Date, Tarea, Subsistema
|
|
66707
|
Tue Feb 9 18:54:22 2010 |
| FX FRERE | fxfrere@neuf.fr | Question | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | can one use a IOption field for conditional tests? | Hi again,
I was wondering if one could use a conditional statement on an IOption attribute? Indeed i try to do a visual logbook (a green check for OK result, a red cross for NOK result), unfortunately i cannot refer to the attributes value for conditional test, e.g:
IOptions Status= "Delete-icon.png" {1}, "Check-icon.png"{2}
Icon comment Delete-icon.png = Failed
Icon comment Check-icon.png = OK
{1} Show Attribute Edit = Attribute1, Attribute2
Thread Icon = Status
Attribute1 and 2 do not have any sense if the result was successful,
ELOG interprets the {1} and {2} as being part of the icon name!
thanks again for your help
FX |
|
66751
|
Fri Mar 12 11:26:27 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.8-2280 | Re: can one use a IOption field for conditional tests? |
| FX FRERE wrote: |
|
Hi again,
I was wondering if one could use a conditional statement on an IOption attribute? Indeed i try to do a visual logbook (a green check for OK result, a red cross for NOK result), unfortunately i cannot refer to the attributes value for conditional test, e.g:
IOptions Status= "Delete-icon.png" {1}, "Check-icon.png"{2}
Icon comment Delete-icon.png = Failed
Icon comment Check-icon.png = OK
{1} Show Attribute Edit = Attribute1, Attribute2
Thread Icon = Status
Attribute1 and 2 do not have any sense if the result was successful,
ELOG interprets the {1} and {2} as being part of the icon name!
thanks again for your help
FX
|
Conditions won't work for IOption attributes. You need an additional attribute like:
Attributes = Status, Subject, Icon
Options Status = OK{1}, Failed{2}
Ioptions Icon = icon1.gif, icon2.gif
{1}Preset icon = icon1.gif
{2}Preset icon = icon2.gif
|
|