ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66633
|
Tue Dec 1 14:20:04 2009 |
 | Terry Shuck | t.lshuck@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.7-2271 | default Status descending | Is there a way to configure ELOG to default to the Status column in descending order rather than the Date in descending order?
Thanks |
|
66632
|
Thu Nov 26 20:37:02 2009 |
 | David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.7- | Re: "Reply to" Author in this forum | > > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > This has happened twice on this forum now, starting from Mon 23rd November.
> >
> > Someone submits an entry (Me, 66625, Bertram Metz 66628)
> > I assume you post a reply (66626, 66629), but it shows up as if I or Bertram are the author of the reply, not
> > yourself. My reply to you (66627) was really authored by me, and I expressed puzzlement then at this point.
> >
> > Is this a bug, or some wierd affect of us forgetting to log out?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David.
>
> Thanks for pointing out this issue. This bug was introduced recently, when I tried to avoid the
>
> Re: Re: Re: ...
>
> in the subject line. I changed this now completely so that we can have
>
> Preset on reply Author = $full_name
> Preset on first reply Subject = Re: $Subject
>
> which fixes both things. The modification is in revision 2271.
Thanks Stefan! |
|
66631
|
Thu Nov 26 17:42:02 2009 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.7- | Re: "Reply to" Author in this forum | > Hi Stefan,
>
> This has happened twice on this forum now, starting from Mon 23rd November.
>
> Someone submits an entry (Me, 66625, Bertram Metz 66628)
> I assume you post a reply (66626, 66629), but it shows up as if I or Bertram are the author of the reply, not
> yourself. My reply to you (66627) was really authored by me, and I expressed puzzlement then at this point.
>
> Is this a bug, or some wierd affect of us forgetting to log out?
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
Thanks for pointing out this issue. This bug was introduced recently, when I tried to avoid the
Re: Re: Re: ...
in the subject line. I changed this now completely so that we can have
Preset on reply Author = $full_name
Preset on first reply Subject = Re: $Subject
which fixes both things. The modification is in revision 2271. |
|
66630
|
Thu Nov 26 14:27:27 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.7- | "Reply to" Author in this forum | Hi Stefan,
This has happened twice on this forum now, starting from Mon 23rd November.
Someone submits an entry (Me, 66625, Bertram Metz 66628)
I assume you post a reply (66626, 66629), but it shows up as if I or Bertram are the author of the reply, not
yourself. My reply to you (66627) was really authored by me, and I expressed puzzlement then at this point.
Is this a bug, or some wierd affect of us forgetting to log out?
Regards,
David. |
|
66629
|
Thu Nov 26 13:12:23 2009 |
| Bertram Metz | Bertram.Metz@gefanuc.com | Question | Other | 2.7.7 | Re: elogd.cfg for this forum | > Hi Stefan,
>
> I'm interested in the current configuration file for this discussion forum. Could you please post it to the
> 'config examples' logbook?
>
> Thanks,
> Bertram
Sure, here it is! |
|
66628
|
Tue Nov 24 10:38:26 2009 |
| Bertram Metz | Bertram.Metz@gefanuc.com | Question | Other | 2.7.7 | elogd.cfg for this forum | Hi Stefan,
I'm interested in the current configuration file for this discussion forum. Could you please post it to the
'config examples' logbook?
Thanks,
Bertram |
|
66627
|
Mon Nov 23 13:17:53 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.7.7-2266 | Re: Attachments and images of attachments | > > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > I attached a 12 page (22kB) pdf file - no images - to an entry, but elog only converted the first 8 pages to
> > images (.png). This is reproducable, i.e. a different small multipage pdf file produced the same number of images.
> >
> > The size of the pdf file does not seem to be a problem, a single page pdf file with a lot of images in it
> > attached as expected.
> >
> > Is this correct, or a defined limitation?
>
> This is a defined limitation. Sometimes people attach whole books in PDF form to an entry, and you don't want to end up
> with hundreds of images cluttering your browser. If you want to see the full document, just load it into your PDF viewer.
Thanks, Stefan (why is this answer down under my name!?)
I couldn't find reference to this in the documentation. In the case I referred to, I'll have to play with the pdf so that
the six pages I actually want displayed are. |
|
66626
|
Mon Nov 23 12:32:14 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.7.7-2266 | Re: Attachments and images of attachments | > Hi Stefan,
>
> I attached a 12 page (22kB) pdf file - no images - to an entry, but elog only converted the first 8 pages to
> images (.png). This is reproducable, i.e. a different small multipage pdf file produced the same number of images.
>
> The size of the pdf file does not seem to be a problem, a single page pdf file with a lot of images in it
> attached as expected.
>
> Is this correct, or a defined limitation?
This is a defined limitation. Sometimes people attach whole books in PDF form to an entry, and you don't want to end up
with hundreds of images cluttering your browser. If you want to see the full document, just load it into your PDF viewer. |
|