ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
793
|
Tue Nov 16 17:49:54 2004 |
| damon nettles | nettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.edu | | | | elog password access without users |
is there a way to set up a logbook so that a password is required to get
into it, but no username? |
795
|
Tue Nov 16 22:06:29 2004 |
| damon nettles | nettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.edu | | | | Re: elog password access without users |
> > is there a way to set up a logbook so that a password is required to get
> > into it, but no username?
>
> Have a look under "Access control" in the manual. What you need is "Read
> Password".
thanks. that seems to get me the functionality i needed. is there any way to
get rid of the username line when using the "Read Password" feature? as it is
now, you can either leave it blank or enter anything you want, so long as you
use the correct password it still works. however, to keep users from getting
confused, i think it would be better to only have a box asking you for the
password and not both the password and username. |
819
|
Fri Nov 26 17:13:27 2004 |
| damon nettles | nettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.edu | | | | Securing Elog with SSL and Apache |
there is a guide on the contributions logbook at
elog:Contributions/11
for securing Elog using SSL and Apache. |
1130
|
Sat May 7 17:51:22 2005 |
| damon nettles | nettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.edu | Question | All | | post box question |
is there any way to get a larger text box to type in when making a new post?
the default box is rather small and you have to scroll up and down when
making a new post or editing an existing one.
once the post is submitted, the display goes to a larger box, but the text
only takes up the left side of the page. seems the only way to get it to go
all the way to the right is to make everything html and submit it that way.
can the normal text look like the html does without submitting it as html? |
1148
|
Thu May 12 18:32:18 2005 |
| damon nettles | nettles@phgrav.phys.lsu.edu | Question | All | | Re: post box question |
> > is there any way to get a larger text box to type in when making a new post?
> > the default box is rather small and you have to scroll up and down when
> > making a new post or editing an existing one.
>
> Message width = <number of characters>
> Message height = <number of lines>
>
> > can the normal text look like the html does without submitting it as html?
>
> No.
thanks stefan. it looks like it was right in front of my face the whole time (on
the elogd.cfg syntax page). but, somehow i missed it. |
2240
|
Mon Jun 4 22:30:44 2007 |
| Alan Grant | netman311@mts.net | Bug report | Linux | Windows | 2.6.0-b4 | Re: Post appearing twice |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dan Chitwood wrote: | We are having trouble on our logbook with posts appearing twice. Both posts contain the same ID number, time, etc. This most often occurs when the e-log entry is being written for an extended period of time (ie. more than 30 minutes), but I don't know if that is the root cause of the problem. It may also be related to posts that are edited after an initial posting. Could this be due to an improper setting in our config file? |
Besides the trivial case that people hit the submit button twice I can only imagine one possible cause: If you edit an existing entry, there is a button Resubmit as new entry at the bottom. If that button is checked, the old entry gets deleted and a new one gets submitted. If the delete of the old entry fails for some reason, you could maybe get two entries.
May I suggest following: Use a very simple config file (like the demo one from the distribution) and see if you can reproduce the problem. If not, add you config options one by one to the config file, and see at which option the problem starts. This way you might find the cause of it.
Your problem has not been reported by anybody else so far, so chances are high that it's related to a config setting. |
I was having a very similar problem. After clicking Submit, I was getting dialog box "Submit modified Elog entry?" (with Submit or Cancel options) even though it was a new entry. Whenever I clicked Submit, it added two identical lines (except for ID), but when I clicked Cancel, it added only one entry. This happened in both v2.6.3 and v2.6.5. I eventually deduced it down to the Required Attributes line in the cfg file. I removed almost all other lines and then started removing each required attribute until the field was identified. For some reason it didn't like field name called "Date/Time Reproted" and when I removed it, it added fine, although that one field had to be unrequired when it really should have been req'd. I didn't see anything in the cfg instuctions regarding the use of "/" (unless I missed it) but I assumed it has something to do with that "/". It's interesting to note however that fields by same name under other tabs work fine. It may be bug related. |
66506
|
Tue Aug 11 00:20:11 2009 |
| Alan Grant | netman311@mts.net | Question | Windows | 2.6.5 | Logbook Parser |
We are exploring whether it's possible/feasible to import ELog logbooks into a another database for special purposes (plotting/statisical, etc). Target database is TBD (perhaps Access).
Does anyone have or know of a logbook parser program? From cut/pasting into, for example, Excel, it does appear that the data fields are already line-feed delimited so offhand it would seem possible to parse if one really wanted to pursue it.
Regards,
- Alan |
66507
|
Tue Aug 11 08:10:21 2009 |
| Alan Grant | netman311@mts.net | Request | Windows | 2.6.5 | List Option |
Hello Stefan.
Currently this is defined as a maximum of 100 literals in the cfg file. I would like to see the option to reference an external text file as input for this.
As a side question, I would also like to increase the max to a greater value, for example, even 5000. I assume I can change the source (I recall var was something like "List_Option_Max") and see if that would still work, but would you know offhand if that would cause a problem anywhere else?
Regards,
Alan
(PS: Just getting started with ELog. Please excuse if these questions sound newbie. I also searched the Forum first but haven't found any answers to them yet.) |