ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66397
|
Mon Jun 15 12:57:17 2009 |
| W.Koster | W.Koster@rug.nl | Question | Linux | V2.7.6-219 | Re: wrapping long lines in config file |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
What I do is to use an editor with automatic wrapping functions, like the free PSPad editor. It nicely wraps line and indicates that:
|
Hmmm... I have to use vi and was hoping an \ at the end of the line (before the LF) would be supported. |
66396
|
Mon Jun 15 12:56:32 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | V2.7.6-219 | Re: search and datetime |
Arno Teunisse wrote: |
Hello
I have the following in elog.cfg :
Attributes = Author, Author Email, Category, Customer, server, Subject , Change Window Begin , Change Window End
List display = ID,Author, Author Email, Category, Customer, server, Subject , Change Window Begin , Change Window End
Type Change Window Begin = datetime
Type Change Window End = datetime
So I want to be able to give a start and end date to the user. However : If I open a find/Search I see this :

There are for each Change Window <item> we get Start: and End: time entries. Was expecting only one date entrie .
Why is this ? Seems to be a feature of datetime or am i missing something.
|
Right, that's a feature. Many people want to specify a range when doing a query on a date. Like Change Window Begin after Jan 1st, 2009 and before Jan 5th, 2009. If you just want a single date, set both Start: and End: to the same date, or actually the End: to Start+1 Day to cover all 24 hours of the Start: date. Otherwise when you have data + time, you would have to match the exact second to retrieve a certain entry. So having a range there is more powerful. |
66395
|
Mon Jun 15 12:51:27 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.7.6-219 | Re: wrapping long lines in config file |
W.Koster wrote: |
Greetings,
I was wondering, is it possible to wrap lines in the config file ?
I have to add a dropdown lost which is kinda long and typing everything on one line will make ik kinda unreadable.
Somehow wrapping the line so each entry will get on a separate line would make it much better readable. (which
makes less errors).
|
What I do is to use an editor with automatic wrapping functions, like the free PSPad editor. It nicely wraps line and indicates that:
 |
66393
|
Fri Jun 12 23:43:28 2009 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.teeling3@chello.nl | Info | Windows | V2.7.6-219 | Dropdown boxes and Moptions | Hello
I have a config file :
Attributes = Author, Author Email, Category, Customer, server,HPSD_ID, Cust_ID ,Subject , Change Window
; which fields will be shown !!
List display = ID,Author, Category, Customer, server, HPSD_ID, Cust_ID,Subject , Change Window
Type Change Window = datetime
# Type Change Window End = datetime
Options Category = Network , Server ,
Options Customer = Arag{A}, Frieslandbank{B}, Super de Boer{C}, NRE{D}
{A} Options server = arag-lin1,arag-lin2,arag-lin3,arag-lin4, arag-lin5, arag-lin6, arag-lin7
{B} Options server = rc1upas02, rc1upas22,rc1upas03,rc1upas04,rc1uptsm01,rc1upas07,rc1upas08
{C} Options server = xia61031,xia61032 ,xia61033,xia61034,xia61035,xia61036,xia61037,xia61038,xia61039,xia61040,xia61032 ,xia61033,xia61034,xia61035,xia61036,xia61037,xia61038,xia61039,xia61040
{D} Options server = server27,server32,server34 ,server37,server38,server40
Extendable options = Category , Customer,server
Required Attributes = server , customer, Subject, Change window Begin , Change Window End
This works OK, However when I change the {A} Options to {A} Moptions in the above code i get an error which tells me that a required field is not selected. So, with the pull down it works, with Moptions ( select boxes ) it will say that a required field is not selected. Any hints ?
regards Arno |
66392
|
Fri Jun 12 16:59:18 2009 |
| W.Koster | W.Koster@rug.nl | Question | Linux | V2.7.6-219 | wrapping long lines in config file | Greetings,
I was wondering, is it possible to wrap lines in the config file ?
I have to add a dropdown lost which is kinda long and typing everything on one line will make ik kinda unreadable.
Somehow wrapping the line so each entry will get on a separate line would make it much better readable. (which
makes less errors).
W.
|
66391
|
Wed Jun 10 22:27:08 2009 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.teeling3@chello.nl | Question | Windows | V2.7.6-219 | search and datetime | Hello
I have the following in elog.cfg :
Attributes = Author, Author Email, Category, Customer, server, Subject , Change Window Begin , Change Window End
List display = ID,Author, Author Email, Category, Customer, server, Subject , Change Window Begin , Change Window End
Type Change Window Begin = datetime
Type Change Window End = datetime
So I want to be able to give a start and end date to the user. However : If I open a find/Search I see this :

There are for each Change Window <item> we get Start: and End: time entries. Was expecting only one date entrie .
Why is this ? Seems to be a feature of datetime or am i missing something.
|
66390
|
Wed Jun 10 15:31:13 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Other | Linux | 2.7.6-2211 | Re: Move to: elog crashes with large no of entries being moved. | > > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > I've been slowly moving threads, and twice now so far (and reproducably) had elog crash.
> >
> > In each case, it is trying to move a thread with more than 24 entries; it copies the first 24 entries, then
> > crashes with "Segmentation Fault". It does not erase the lock file /var/run/elog.pid
> >
> > I have got around this by manually copying the entries beyond no 24, then deleting the thread entry by entry.
> >
> > I am aware that I have an old and limited machine (586, 256MB RAM, running Slack 10), and at first I was
> > "content" to write it off as that; but when it crashed for the second time at exactly the same entry (the
> > twenty-forth) even though the size of the entries would have been significantly different, I wondered if there
> > was some factor within elog that could affect this.
> >
> > I've not tried it with Copy to:, but imagine it will also be affected as the only difference with this and Move
> > to: is the deletion of the thread after all the entries had been copied.
>
> This rings a bell: it's probably related to some internal stack overflow, since the entries are copied
> recursively. I have an idea on how to fix that, but I need time for that.
Thanks Stefan, I'll be keeping an eye out on any annoucement about this one! |
66389
|
Wed Jun 10 14:09:04 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Other | Linux | 2.7.6-2211 | Re: Move to: elog crashes with large no of entries being moved. | > Hi Stefan,
>
> I've been slowly moving threads, and twice now so far (and reproducably) had elog crash.
>
> In each case, it is trying to move a thread with more than 24 entries; it copies the first 24 entries, then
> crashes with "Segmentation Fault". It does not erase the lock file /var/run/elog.pid
>
> I have got around this by manually copying the entries beyond no 24, then deleting the thread entry by entry.
>
> I am aware that I have an old and limited machine (586, 256MB RAM, running Slack 10), and at first I was
> "content" to write it off as that; but when it crashed for the second time at exactly the same entry (the
> twenty-forth) even though the size of the entries would have been significantly different, I wondered if there
> was some factor within elog that could affect this.
>
> I've not tried it with Copy to:, but imagine it will also be affected as the only difference with this and Move
> to: is the deletion of the thread after all the entries had been copied.
This rings a bell: it's probably related to some internal stack overflow, since the entries are copied
recursively. I have an idea on how to fix that, but I need time for that. |
|