Re: Record ID corruption, posted by Frank Baptista on Sun May 3 22:43:12 2020
|
Hi David,
Thanks for the quick response! Well, I'd have to say that the sequence is as tangled as it looks in the logbook -- I've attached
a copy of the log file for your reading pleasure. |
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Mon May 4 14:55:53 2020
|
Hi Frank,
There are two interesting points about the log file.
1. Entry 5658 is timestamped later than 5659, but is earlier in the entry list. It also is "In Reply to" 5659. despite |
How to prevent file path leaks on a 404 page, posted by Rich Loring on Tue May 12 15:47:33 2020
|
Hello,
We used the Elog RPM binary installation method to install Elog. Our security scanners are complaining that Elog discloses the version information
when you hit a missing page (404 error). How can I hide this version info? Is there a snippet of code somewhere that I can comment out? |
How to prevent file path leaks on a 404 page, posted by Rich Loring on Tue May 12 15:53:17 2020
|
Hello,
We used the Elog RPM binary installation method to install Elog. Our security scanners are complaining that Elog discloses the version information
when you hit a missing page (404 error). How can I hide this version info? Is there a snippet of code somewhere that I can comment out? |
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by Frank Baptista on Fri May 22 21:03:05 2020
|
Hi David,
Well, you've made some very interesting observations, and raised some excellent questions. So, I went back and did some homework, reviewing
a number of logbooks to find instances where this strange 'record twist' occurs. You had asked, "Do you have enough information to decided |
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Sat May 23 16:15:38 2020
|
Hi Frank,
Good bit of detective work. To me it suggests that something as yet undetermined occurs, that, when the 57th reply happens, causes the
issue. If that "something" hasn't happened, all is well. Apart from Heinz varieties (not true, in fact), 57 isn't an obvious |
email notification for self register 2 3 and 4, posted by pierre brionnet on Mon Jun 8 07:30:06 2020
|
Hi,
I have set up my elog for testing and setup postfix to be able to send email notification for register of new user but whatever i try elog cannot
set email. I try to sent test email in my bash and this is working without problem to my gmail account. |
Re: email notification for self register 2 3 and 4, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jun 8 08:11:33 2020
|
Why don't you start elogd interactively with the "-v" flag (verbose) and watch the communication between elog and postfix. Maybe you see
a specific error there.
Stefan |