Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 477 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OSdown ELOG Version Subject
  66722   Mon Feb 22 11:15:48 2010 Reply Yoshio ImaiQuestionLinuxlatestRe: Log Thread Close Automatically

tom wrote:

 If you have a logbook and you create a new entry, is it possible to put a time limit on that new entry so that edits/replies are only valid for certain amount of time.  I am looking for a way that would allow me to have a user start a new message, but after 8 hours, that message becomes locked and no one can edit or add to the message.  This is for some shift work and we do not want users to go back after their shift and edit the messages.  

 

Did you consider using the "Restrict edit time" option? It should provide the necessary functionality, as long as you don't want to lock the entry at a fixed absolute time, but really only x hours after creation (also, as you talked about closing the "thread" automatically, there is no option to prevent replies after a certain amount of time).

See the administrator's guide.

  66726   Tue Mar 2 14:21:46 2010 Question soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chQuestionLinux2.7.8-2282Thread view problem in searches

Hi,

When I upgrade from build 2278 to  2282 the thread view changes when performing searches: The thread children are not indented and there are no "thread icons" in the search list (e.g. like the read right arrow for replies).

On the forum site I also note that the thread view is not indented when performing searches.

Does anyone have an idea ?

Soren

 

  66728   Wed Mar 3 22:28:04 2010 Question Devin Bougiedab66@lepp.cornell.eduRequestLinux2.7.5difficulty with slow connections (was Re: frequent crashes on SL4)
Hi, Stefan.  When someone using a satellite connection tries to upload an attachment *or* edit a long entry, it fails and they are presented
with an "Internal Server Error."  This is a huge improvement over the previous behavior of crashing elogd, but we were wondering if there is any
hope of improving this further so that one can edit large entries or upload attachments over a slow (in this case, satellite) connection.  Do
you have any ideas or plans on working on this further?  Apparently ELOG is the "only" service this user has trouble with from  home.

Any information you could provide would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks,
Devin
  66733   Sat Mar 6 20:53:25 2010 Warning soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chBug reportLinux2.7.8-2282Re: Thread view problem in searches

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi,

When I upgrade from build 2278 to  2282 the thread view changes when performing searches: The thread children are not indented and there are no "thread icons" in the search list (e.g. like the read right arrow for replies).

On the forum site I also note that the thread view is not indented when performing searches.

Does anyone have an idea ?

Soren

 

This seems to be a bug. I reproduced it with a different browser (Opera) with the default ELOG configuration. When I do Find and select Display Threads I have the message icons but the layout is not correct. Also, all message icons are of the "reply" type even if they are new threads.

This concerns only the latest build 2282.

Soren

 

  66743   Thu Mar 11 15:44:01 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.8-2282Re: Thread view problem in searches

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi,

When I upgrade from build 2278 to  2282 the thread view changes when performing searches: The thread children are not indented and there are no "thread icons" in the search list (e.g. like the read right arrow for replies).

On the forum site I also note that the thread view is not indented when performing searches.

Does anyone have an idea ?

Soren

 

This seems to be a bug. I reproduced it with a different browser (Opera) with the default ELOG configuration. When I do Find and select Display Threads I have the message icons but the layout is not correct. Also, all message icons are of the "reply" type even if they are new threads.

This concerns only the latest build 2282.

Soren

 

That's not a bug, that's a feature

But honestly, this feature was requested recently and implemented. See https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66670. So when searching, the thread organization is broken up and messages are treated independently. If you want to see the thread for a certain entry in you search result page, click on that entry and you will see the full thread above the entry. 

  66748   Fri Mar 12 09:18:11 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinuxlatestRe: Log Thread Close Automatically

tom wrote:

 If you have a logbook and you create a new entry, is it possible to put a time limit on that new entry so that edits/replies are only valid for certain amount of time.  I am looking for a way that would allow me to have a user start a new message, but after 8 hours, that message becomes locked and no one can edit or add to the message.  This is for some shift work and we do not want users to go back after their shift and edit the messages.  

What you need is

Restrict edit time = ...

as written in the manual.

  66749   Fri Mar 12 09:27:25 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.8-2282Re: Problem using attribute type

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi,

This little logbook has a problem:

------------------------

Attributes = Author, Category, Type, Subject, Number

Type Number = numeric

Options Category = General{1}
{1} Options Type = Routine

------------------------

(it was of course more complicated to start with).

When creating a new entry and selecting the Category option, there is a problem with the JavaScript which will populate the Type option.

To avoid the problem, I just comment out the line "Type Number ... "

 

Is this a bug ?

Thanks for your time

Soren

 

(P.S. Using a reserved name as an attribute name is maybe not optimal, but it does not seem to be the  problem).

 

 

 

 

 

 To overcome this problem it is sufficient to switch language from "Language = french" to "Language = english"

It was a mistake not to include the "global" settings in this bug report.

What probably happens is that something in the French translation (accents ?) disturbs the java scripting.

Soren

 

 To use "Language = french" it is necessary to remove or substitute the accent character ' with something else in eloglang.french and then the Javascript code works again.

Soren

Indeed it was the JavaScript line

if (document.form1.Number.value != '- garder les valeurs d'origine -') {

which caused the trouble.  The "'" character closed the string '- garder les valeurs d', which caused an exception. I changed it to

if (document.form1.Number.value != "- garder les valeurs d'origine -") {

and now it should work fine.

  66753   Fri Mar 12 12:49:39 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux2.7.5difficulty with slow connections (was Re: frequent crashes on SL4)
> Hi, Stefan.  When someone using a satellite connection tries to upload an attachment *or* edit a long entry, it fails and they are presented
> with an "Internal Server Error."  This is a huge improvement over the previous behavior of crashing elogd, but we were wondering if there is any
> hope of improving this further so that one can edit large entries or upload attachments over a slow (in this case, satellite) connection.  Do
> you have any ideas or plans on working on this further?  Apparently ELOG is the "only" service this user has trouble with from  home.

There was a timeout of 1 sec. in the elogd daemon, which probably is too short for a satellite connection. Unfortunately I have no satellite here 
around to test it, so I "blindly" increased it to 6 seconds in the current SVN version. Please give it a try. You can increase this yourself, its here 
in the code at (Rev. 2291) line 28270:

   FD_ZERO(&readfds);
   FD_SET(_sock, &readfds);
   timeout.tv_sec = 6;            <----
   timeout.tv_usec = 0;
   status = select(FD_SETSIZE, (void *) &readfds, NULL, NULL, (void *) &timeout);

so you can change the 6 to 10 or so. The disadvantage of a large value is the following: Suppose you submit an entry, and in the middle of the 
submission your browser dies (or the user closes it). If you have a timeout of n seconds, the elogd server will wait that time until it closes the 
connection. During this waiting time is cannot respond to other request, so it might look dead. That's why we should not make it too long.

- Stefan
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6