"New User" option does not work when Authentication=Webserver, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Fri May 29 09:27:32 2020
|
Our setup uses "Authentication=Webserver" + no automatic user registration. Thus, logbook admins should add a user by clicking "Config"
and then "New user". However, no matter what they fill in in the "new user " dialog, as soon as they hit "Save" an error
pops up saying that their username (the admin one, not the new one) already exists. I found the following code: |
Re: "New User" option does not work when Authentication=Webserver, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Wed Aug 18 09:05:51 2021 
|
here's the patch that I use to enable use creation and deletion in combination with Webserver authentication.
The idea behind the patch is that if the user logged in via "http_user" is an elog admin, then {s}he is allowed to save a random
user configuration, including creating or deleting a user. |
Default "Author" when replying to a log entry, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Tue Feb 1 15:39:38 2022
|
what is the default value for "Author" when replying to a log entry ? I now see that for each reply to a log entry, the value of "Author"
is set to the value of the author of the original entry - this makes it very hard to see which user has replied to a particular log entry, especially when
users start replying to replies etc. |
|
Re: Default "Author" when replying to a log entry, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Tue Feb 1 16:43:34 2022
|
Excellent, exactly what I was looking for, many thanks!
Stefan |
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Mon Mar 7 17:46:39 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Wed Mar 9 17:55:31 2022
|
I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables |
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Tue Apr 19 17:02:57 2022
|
> > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Fri Apr 22 17:10:24 2022
|
> > > > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > > > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > > > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|