Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 518 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Authordown Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1353   Thu Jul 28 01:02:00 2005 Warning John Habermannjohn.habermann@wilderness.org.auBug reportLinux 2.5.9+r16problem with list display attribute
I not sure if this has been found and fixed as I did find something to do with the list display attribute in the forums but wasn't sure if it was the same thing.

There seems to be a bug with the List Display attribute in that it drops the last attribute of the list. So in my example if I want to display the Subject in my list I have to add a dummy attribute after it otherwise the Subject will not be displayed. The comma after Subject is not enough, but all you have to do is to add 1 letter and then you will see the subject in List view. If you don't all I see is the Date and Author fields and then the Text field in my Summary view in the log book.

List Display = Date,Author,Subject,t

I am running elog 2.5.9+r1674-1 on Debian sarge.
  67183   Fri Feb 10 17:18:25 2012 Reply John Doroshenkodoroshenko@physics.rutgers.eduBug reportLinux | Windows2.9.0Re: ssl problems

Olaf Kasten wrote:

 Hi there,

I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't  connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg. 

I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.

I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?

Thx. Olaf

 

Hi!

This just started happening here also.  Some users can't get on to a SSL=1 config'd elog using either IE or firefox 10 (win7 or linux) or chrome.  SAFARI works.  Occurs in 2.8.0 and a newly built (even after

ssl yum updates) 2.9.0 version on SL5.5 system.  Seems to accept self signed cert then nothing.. (connection reset message).   Tried an stunnel from one port to port running elog

with SSL=0.  Same behavior.  Doesn't work on some browsers.  Any clues?

Thanks,

-John

  67195   Tue Feb 14 00:55:58 2012 Reply John Doroshenkodoroshenko@physics.rutgers.eduBug fixLinux | Windows2.9.0Re: ssl problems

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

John Doroshenko wrote:

Olaf Kasten wrote:

 Hi there,

I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't  connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg. 

I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.

I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?

Thx. Olaf

 Hi!

This just started happening here also.  Some users can't get on to a SSL=1 config'd elog using either IE or firefox 10 (win7 or linux) or chrome.  SAFARI works.  Occurs in 2.8.0 and a newly built (even after

ssl yum updates) 2.9.0 version on SL5.5 system.  Seems to accept self signed cert then nothing.. (connection reset message).   Tried an stunnel from one port to port running elog

with SSL=0.  Same behavior.  Doesn't work on some browsers.  Any clues?

Thanks,

-John

Hi everyone,
it appears that many people have this problem. I believe this is simply a problem of your firewall settings. There are two simple checks you can do to test if I'm right or wrong:
  • Run your logbook on the standard port 443 and retry. If the special port has been opened on the firewall, it has been likely only opened for specific clients like firefox 3.6, IE 7, etc. If you use a different client (FF 10, IE 9) the port can be blocked.
  • Or just run the browser that does not work on the ELOG server. If it works to access ELOG via localhost, then you know for sure that it is the firewall.
I've actually tested it here at my institute: I've downloaded firefox 10 and could access ELOG on port 443 but couldn't access it on port 444, unless I've started FF10 on the ELOG host.
To John, Olaf and Christian: If you need to be able to use a special port and a certain set of browsers then just contact your computing division or whoever maintains your firewalls.
 
I hope this settles the matter.
Cheers
Andreas
 
Detect language » English
 

PS: I've solved this with the help of google  : have a look at http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2295421#2295421 about firewalls

 Hi,

Thanks for the reply. 

The elog server is running SL5.5 (updates applied).  As you suggested, I ran firefox 3.6.26 on the elog server via https://localhost:port and it worked fine.   Downloaded firefox 10.0.1 and retried

on elog server and get error again:  The connection was Reset; The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.

-John

 

  67198   Tue Feb 14 20:41:08 2012 Reply John Doroshenkodoroshenko@physics.rutgers.eduBug fixLinux | Windows2.9.0Re: ssl problems

John Doroshenko wrote:

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

John Doroshenko wrote:

Olaf Kasten wrote:

 Hi there,

I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't  connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg. 

I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.

I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?

Thx. Olaf

 Hi!

This just started happening here also.  Some users can't get on to a SSL=1 config'd elog using either IE or firefox 10 (win7 or linux) or chrome.  SAFARI works.  Occurs in 2.8.0 and a newly built (even after

ssl yum updates) 2.9.0 version on SL5.5 system.  Seems to accept self signed cert then nothing.. (connection reset message).   Tried an stunnel from one port to port running elog

with SSL=0.  Same behavior.  Doesn't work on some browsers.  Any clues?

Thanks,

-John

Hi everyone,
it appears that many people have this problem. I believe this is simply a problem of your firewall settings. There are two simple checks you can do to test if I'm right or wrong:
  • Run your logbook on the standard port 443 and retry. If the special port has been opened on the firewall, it has been likely only opened for specific clients like firefox 3.6, IE 7, etc. If you use a different client (FF 10, IE 9) the port can be blocked.
  • Or just run the browser that does not work on the ELOG server. If it works to access ELOG via localhost, then you know for sure that it is the firewall.
I've actually tested it here at my institute: I've downloaded firefox 10 and could access ELOG on port 443 but couldn't access it on port 444, unless I've started FF10 on the ELOG host.
To John, Olaf and Christian: If you need to be able to use a special port and a certain set of browsers then just contact your computing division or whoever maintains your firewalls.
 
I hope this settles the matter.
Cheers
Andreas
 
Detect language » English
 

PS: I've solved this with the help of google  : have a look at http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2295421#2295421 about firewalls

 Hi,

Thanks for the reply. 

The elog server is running SL5.5 (updates applied).  As you suggested, I ran firefox 3.6.26 on the elog server via https://localhost:port and it worked fine.   Downloaded firefox 10.0.1 and retried

on elog server and get error again:  The connection was Reset; The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.

-John

 

 Hi,

One of our sys admins discovered that Firefox 10 appeared to send parts of the initial GET in two parts.  As if there was a flush() after the "G" and this caused elog problems.  By making the change in

the patch below, the read loop is re-entered again after the 2nd part of the GET comes in.   Firefox 10.0.1 then works with ELOG with SSL.   Stefan... perhaps you can take a look to see if there is a

better way to accomplish this? 

One side effect with it done this way is that if you start a connection (ie, telnet localhost port) and type a single character,  the elog will block further connections until the telnet is terminated.

Thank you,

-John Doroshenko

Attachment 1: fire10elog.patch
--- elogd.c.orig	2012-02-14 12:54:05.000000000 -0500
+++ elogd.c	2012-02-14 13:20:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -28805,7 +28805,9 @@
 
                   /* finish when empty line received */
                   pend = NULL;
-                  if (strncmp(net_buffer, "GET", 3) == 0 && strncmp(net_buffer, "POST", 4) != 0) {
+		  if (len < 4) { 
+		    pend = net_buffer + len;
+		  } else if (strncmp(net_buffer, "GET", 3) == 0 && strncmp(net_buffer, "POST", 4) != 0) {
                      if (len > 4 && strstr(net_buffer, "\r\n\r\n") != NULL) {
                         pend = strstr(net_buffer, "\r\n\r\n") + 4;
                         break;
  67202   Thu Feb 16 23:56:35 2012 Reply John Doroshenkodoroshenko@physics.rutgers.eduBug fixLinux | Windows2.9.0Re: ssl problems

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Yes, there is a new feature called record splitting which causes the browser to send the "G" of the "GET ..." in a dedicated TCP package. This started in FF10, Chrome 17, and it will come in others as well. It only affects direct SSL connections (SSL=1). I fixed the bug in SVN revision #2435. Please update also MXML to revision #73. Let's hope that surprises like that will not happen too often.

- Stefan
 

 Thank you Stefan!  I put up your new svn revision and we're back in business.  Seems to be working perfectly.

 

And thank you again for your efforts with regards to ELOG.  It is an incredibly handy tool.

 

-John

 

  67357   Mon Oct 15 16:10:52 2012 Question John Beckerj.becker@airportaruba.comQuestionWindows2.9.2-2455Protect Selection

 Hi, I have a question regarding the Protect Selection option. I have the option enabled and I have to login to get into the logbook. What I would like to accomplish is that the page does not display anything (none of the posts) when it is opened. The only option should be to login.

Is this possible?

 

Regards,

 

John

  68476   Wed Nov 30 18:06:26 2016 Entry John Beckerj.becker@airportaruba.comQuestionLinux3.12-9a18b27Disable Delete option when user has the capability to Edit an entry

Hi, I have a logbook where users can add entries and edit entries.

The delete option has been removed from the menu, but when they edit an entry they are able to delete the entry.

Is there a way to remove the Delete option from the menu that appears when Editing an entry?

Please advise,

 

Thanks,

 

John

 

Attachment 1: 2016-11-30_131205.jpg
2016-11-30_131205.jpg
  68480   Thu Dec 1 13:36:16 2016 Reply John Beckerj.becker@airportaruba.comQuestionLinux3.12-9a18b27Re: Disable Delete option when user has the capability to Edit an entry

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your reply, I did as suggested but the button "Delete" still appears when the edit entry is selected.

Am I overlooking something?

 

Regards,

 

John

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Save drafts = 0

 

John Becker wrote:

Hi, I have a logbook where users can add entries and edit entries.

The delete option has been removed from the menu, but when they edit an entry they are able to delete the entry.

Is there a way to remove the Delete option from the menu that appears when Editing an entry?

Please advise,

 

Thanks,

 

John

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 2016-12-01_083434.jpg
2016-12-01_083434.jpg
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6