Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 526 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6457 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 525, 526, 527 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  65620   Sat Oct 6 14:05:01 2007        

I ended with 125384 entries like the one above.

Everything works fine but ......... [U]tteerrrriibbllee[/U] [B]slow[/B].  CPU usage is constant at 99%.  

I tried to split the one file produced by the import into 2 chunks but that did not improve the situation.

My question is : Is there a rule of thumb for the size of the "database" in which elog keeps it's performance, or better : is there a solution for this for elog.
  2321   Thu Oct 4 17:19:56 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequest ELOG V2.6.Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload

Fergus Lynch wrote:
I would like to request a new feature - add date and time stamp to file upload. We use ELOG (amongst other things!) as a change log and this would really allow allow more accurate records to be kept. For instance we upload router config files (to record changes)and having the exact upload date would be a big enhancement, especially when there are a lot of attachments.


There is already a time and a date stamp. If you look in the logbook directory, you see attachments preceded with the date and time when they were submitted. You can see this date/time when you click on the attachment, such as in

http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Config+Examples/040519_000348/elogd.cfg

where you will see it even in the URL (May 19th, 2004, 0:03:48) in the above case. I agree that this is not so obvious. If you make a proposal where this date/time should be displayed, I can easily add it.
  2320   Thu Oct 4 12:03:30 2007 Smile Fergus Lynchflynch@alternativenetworks.comRequest ELOG V2.6.Add date and time stamp to file upload
Hi,

Been using ELOG for a couple of years now and I am very impressed with its functionality.

I would like to request a new feature - add date and time stamp to file upload. We use ELOG (amongst other things!) as a change log and this would really allow allow more accurate records to be kept. For instance we upload router config files (to record changes)and having the exact upload date would be a big enhancement, especially when there are a lot of attachments.

Many Thanks in Advance
Fergus
  2319   Fri Sep 28 17:52:37 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows2.6.5-1844Re: Post appearing twice

Bertram Metz wrote:
I've observed the same behavior with attributes containing a dash. Would it be possible to allow '-' in attributes?


Yes. Fixed in Revision 1930.
  2318   Thu Sep 27 15:18:10 2007 Question Bertram MetzBertram.Metz@gefanuc.comQuestionLinux | Windows2.6.5-1844Re: Post appearing twice
I've observed the same behavior with attributes containing a dash. Would it be possible to allow '-' in attributes?

Bertram
  2317   Tue Sep 11 21:25:11 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.6.2-1739Re: Too many logbooks during user registration

Steve Jones wrote:
So the list is shown to the one requesting the registration? Would it be possible to have an option that, when selected, simply did not list any logbooks? I can see a customer becoming confused if they did not see their logbook listed. Just turn off the selection completely. Otherwise, this will work but I fear will generate more questions as in "Why isn't logbook <blah> listed?"


I agree, that's inconsistent. So I removed the logbook list completely (SVN revision 1914) and added a note on the user notification that they should click 'config' to subscribe to any logbook.
  2316   Tue Sep 11 15:30:11 2007 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comRequestAll2.6.2-1739Re: Too many logbooks during user registration

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Jones wrote:
Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).

My question: Is it possible to limit - or remove - the checkboxes that the user can select during registration? I realize that this is a browser issue but I doubt I can persuade those guys to fix FireFox.

Thanks.


I changed the current SVN version (#1909) to show only the list of logbooks if there are ten or less logbooks, in order not to make the URL too long. On the activation by the administrator, the list of subscribed logbooks appears as previously, but all are unchecked. So it's the task of the administrator to enable subscriptions or not.



Quote:
So the list is shown to the one requesting the registration? Would it be possible to have an option that, when selected, simply did not list any logbooks? I can see a customer becoming confused if they did not see their logbook listed. Just turn off the selection completely. Otherwise, this will work but I fear will generate more questions as in "Why isn't logbook <blah> listed?"

Thanks!
  2315   Tue Sep 11 11:36:04 2007 Reply toumbitoumbi@yopmail.comQuestion 2.6.5-1890Re: ELCode how to with URL
Thank you a lot !!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 525, 526, 527 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6