ELOG Forum

Re: Post appearing twice

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Alan Grant wrote:

I was having a very similar problem. After clicking Submit, I was getting dialog box "Submit modified Elog entry?" (with Submit or Cancel options) even though it was a new entry. Whenever I clicked Submit, it added two identical lines (except for ID), but when I clicked Cancel, it added only one entry. This happened in both v2.6.3 and v2.6.5.

Can you try to reproduce your problem with a minimal configuration file and send it to me?

I had the same problem but by adding the "Use lock = 0" option to the configuration, confirmation disappear

2261

Wed Jun 27 22:01:56 2007

Error sending Email via "XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX"

I read most of the posts and used the -v to see whats happening, all i get is this. It hangs at the "250 HELP" line for about 3 secs then moves on to what is displayed. From the posts it looks like there should be alot more info to see. Any idea on how to get it to display right?

I have telneted into the mail server and tested it, so i know its working that way.

-----------------------------11323166884439--

Email "Case Holder" JJ to jsheppard@XXXX.net

timezone: 18000, offset: -14400

Email from advservices@XXXX.net to jsheppard@XXXX.net, SMTP host XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:
220 Welcome to the @Mail v4.4 SMTP Server ( Exim )
EHLO server.XXXX.net
250-MX1.SPIDERHOST.COM Hello server.XXXX.net [XXX.XXX.XX.XX]
250-SIZE 10485760
250-PIPELINING
250-AUTH LOGIN
250 HELP
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.5-1844
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Location: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:8080/2WaySupport/1?error=Error+sending+Email+via+<i>"XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX"</i>
Content-Length: 20

2266

Thu Jun 28 17:12:11 2007

JJ Sheppard wrote:

220 Welcome to the @Mail v4.4 SMTP Server ( Exim )
EHLO server.XXXX.net
250-MX1.SPIDERHOST.COM Hello server.XXXX.net [XXX.XXX.XX.XX]
250-SIZE 10485760
250-PIPELINING
250-AUTH LOGIN
250 HELP

The problem there is that your SMPT server does not reply with

250 OK

which my server does. So elogd was waiting 3 seconds for "OK", and then aborted. I change the code (now in SVN revision 1871) to look for "250 " (with one blank at the end). You have to update from SVN, recompile and try again. Anyhow elogd only supports plain login authentication ("AUTH LOGIN"), which not all SMPT servers accept. You have to see.

2274

Fri Jun 29 16:14:16 2007

Stefan Ritt wrote:

JJ Sheppard wrote:

220 Welcome to the @Mail v4.4 SMTP Server ( Exim )
EHLO server.XXXX.net
250-MX1.SPIDERHOST.COM Hello server.XXXX.net [XXX.XXX.XX.XX]
250-SIZE 10485760
250-PIPELINING
250-AUTH LOGIN
250 HELP

The problem there is that your SMPT server does not reply with

250 OK

This is what I get now, Is this the Auth Login problem you were speaking of?

Email from elog@XXXXX.net to jsheppard@XXXXX.net, SMTP host XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:
220-server.XXXXXX.net ESMTP Exim 4.66 #1 Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:03:22 -0400
220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited,
220 and/or bulk e-mail.
EHLO server.tracstar.net
250-server.tracstar.net Hello server.XXXXXX.net [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX]
250-SIZE 52428800
250-PIPELINING
250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
250-STARTTLS
250 HELP
AUTH LOGIN
Username:
XXXXXXXX
Password:
XXXXXXXX
535 Incorrect authentication data
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found

2275

Fri Jun 29 16:16:58 2007

JJ Sheppard wrote:

No. It looks like PLAIN LOGIN is supported, but your username/password is wrong. Ask your SMPT system administrator.

2276

Fri Jun 29 16:30:46 2007

Stefan Ritt wrote:

JJ Sheppard wrote:

No. It looks like PLAIN LOGIN is supported, but your username/password is wrong. Ask your SMPT system administrator.

I dubbed checked it and ran the -t command to make sure it was the right password. Any thing else I can try?

This is whats in the global
SMTP host = XXX.XX.XX.XX
SMTP username = advservices@XXXXX.XXX
SMTP Password = dDE5ODQ=
Use Email From = advservices@XXXX.XXX

and i still get this
250 HELP
AUTH LOGIN
Username:
XXXXX
Password:
XXXXX
535 Incorrect authentication data

2277

Fri Jun 29 16:43:23 2007

JJ Sheppard wrote:

Any thing else I can try?

Maybe advservices instead of advservices@XXXXX.XXX ? Just an idea.

2278

Fri Jun 29 16:54:39 2007