ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66788
|
Sat Apr 17 01:06:58 2010 |
| Jason St. John | stjohn@bu.edu | Request | Linux | 2.7.8-2278 | Can other pages hide behind elog user authentication? | Hello,
The elog security suits me just fine: the content is not available unless users have logged in, and as administrator I have complete control over who that is and what their privileges are. I can easily share somewhat sensitive notes, plots, and findings without making them completely open to the world.
I have a project which generates html pages, which I'm also not really supposed to make public to the world. I'd rather not resort to attaching them to elog entries.
Could the elog security be extended to control access to other files I put on the server?
Thanks,
-jmsj |
68355
|
Tue Jul 12 16:18:46 2016 |
| Jason S | titancomp@hotmail.ca | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-3f311c5 | Using Reply option | Forgive me I'm not incredibly Elog savy yet.
A little backround about this log book - I have our log set up as individual user names. The log book is designed for entrys to be made when a process shutdown needs to be bypassed. The operator will create an entry and submit it. Then a supervisor will come in after and review/approve it. I've removed the edit function, but left the "Reply" option available for the supervisor to go into the same entry and check off the "Reviewed" attribute. When the reviewed attribute is checked off, even with a different logged in author the next entry ID still shows the original author that put in the entry rather then the author who clicked reviewed. If there a way to get around this?
[Process Bypass]
Comment = (Not in use right now, currently developing)
Attributes = Author, Date/Time of Bypass, Equipment Name, Device Tag, Supervisor Sign-off,
Moptions Supervisor Sign-off = Reviewed
List Menu commands = New, Find, Logout
Menu Commands = New, Find, Reply, Logout
Required Attributes = Date/Time of ByPass, Equipment Name, Device Tag
|
68357
|
Tue Jul 12 20:53:03 2016 |
| Jason S | titancomp@hotmail.ca | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-3f311c5 | Re: Using Reply option | Works Great. Thanks Andreas
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Preset on reply Author = $long_name
Cheers, Andreas
Jason S wrote: |
Forgive me I'm not incredibly Elog savy yet.
A little backround about this log book - I have our log set up as individual user names. The log book is designed for entrys to be made when a process shutdown needs to be bypassed. The operator will create an entry and submit it. Then a supervisor will come in after and review/approve it. I've removed the edit function, but left the "Reply" option available for the supervisor to go into the same entry and check off the "Reviewed" attribute. When the reviewed attribute is checked off, even with a different logged in author the next entry ID still shows the original author that put in the entry rather then the author who clicked reviewed. If there a way to get around this?
[Process Bypass]
Comment = (Not in use right now, currently developing)
Attributes = Author, Date/Time of Bypass, Equipment Name, Device Tag, Supervisor Sign-off,
Moptions Supervisor Sign-off = Reviewed
List Menu commands = New, Find, Logout
Menu Commands = New, Find, Reply, Logout
Required Attributes = Date/Time of ByPass, Equipment Name, Device Tag
|
|
|
68721
|
Wed Jan 17 18:11:49 2018 |
| Jason Moore | jason.moore@viewglass.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.1-200 | Adding New User Failed During Email Send | The following error occured during the addition of new user, first time this occured:
"Cannot send email notification to "xxx@xxx.com" Sender address rejected: Domain not found
Please use your browser's back button to go back
We are using version 2.7.1-2002. Could this be a version issue? When we loaded the new version, the browser GUI was scrambled and illegible using Microsoft Edge/Explorer and Firefox. |
1595
|
Tue Jan 17 01:01:05 2006 |
| Jason Koglin | koglin@astro.columbia.edu | Question | | V2.6.0 | localhost definition problem | I've been running elog on my laptop for about a year. I have had a problem several times now when I have had a bad crash of my computer that afterwards elog does not run correctly. The problem appears to be that "localhost" (e.g., http://localhost:8080/) gets changed to a domain name (http://sylvester.columbia.edu:8080/) which is not registered. I only want it to access this elog database locally on my machine and do not even want to set it up as a web server.
I freshly installed it and when I type in http://localhost:8080/ it sends me to http://localhost:8080/demo/ . If I click on the first and only entry it sends me to http://sylvester.columbia.edu:8080/demo/1 and an error occurs loading the page. However if I type in http://localhost:8080/demo/1 it brings up the first entry correctly, but with no formatting because presumably it is looking in the wrong place for the default theme.
How do I fix this since this time reinstalling and rebooting hasn't fixed the problem?
Thanks,
Jason. |
433
|
Sun Sep 21 09:33:46 2003 |
| Jason | jason@jasonmorgan.com | | Other | elog2.3.9 | FreeBSD Install | I am getting the following errors when trying to install elog-2.3.9 on
my FreeBSD box. I am running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE.
Many thanks!
"Makefile", line 21: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 27: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 29: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 31: Need an operator
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
You4eea |
68821
|
Wed Jun 13 18:08:06 2018 |
| Janusz Szuba | janusz.szuba@xfel.eu | Request | Linux | 3.1.3 | number of entries in Login user list | Hi,
could it be possible to increase the limit of entries in Login user list from 100 to somewhat reasonably higher? Like twice or 3 times as much. Similar limit exist also on Admin user list, which is afair 10, could this also be increased?
best
Janusz |
68823
|
Thu Jun 14 13:07:32 2018 |
| Janusz Szuba | janusz.szuba@xfel.eu | Request | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: number of entries in Login user list | Thanks, good point, I was not sure that in case of other lists which will be changed as well, there will not be any problems, like overflow, etc.
Regarding admin list, now I remember, that was the limit to send email notification in case of registration requests. But actually it is not important right now.
best
Janusz
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Janusz,
You can change the following line in elogd.h and recompile:
#define MAX_N_LIST 100
That'll change the login user list limit. But it'll change other list length as well - which should not do harm unless you are very short of memory.
I don't see the Admin user list limit of 10 - aparently that is hard coded somewhere deep within (or I've just missed it).
Cheers, Andreas
Janusz Szuba wrote: |
Hi,
could it be possible to increase the limit of entries in Login user list from 100 to somewhat reasonably higher? Like twice or 3 times as much. Similar limit exist also on Admin user list, which is afair 10, could this also be increased?
best
Janusz
|
|
|
|