Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Mon Feb 6 16:44:46 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Angus Au"]ld: fatal: library -lutil: not found[/quote]
The [B]util[/B] library was added recently because of the new shell substitution functionaly, which requires the [B]forkpty()[/B] function call. If you |
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 6 16:48:17 2006
|
[QUOTE="Steve Jones"]I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following
elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?[/QUOTE]
|
|
Re: elog allows me to create user "blahblah ", posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 6 16:53:41 2006
|
[quote="Dimitrios Tsirigkas"]I wouldn't want some imposter to start entering stuff under the username of another user, so it would be nice if I could have
some way of forcing them to have a password, even if it's a one-letter password.[/quote]
|
|
Re: sort after find, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 6 17:15:11 2006
|
[quote="Willem Koster"]Obviously I would like to be able to sort the result of a find-query.[/quote]
That worked some time ago, but did not work currently. So I fixed that in the current SVN version. |
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Feb 8 18:19:02 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][QUOTE="Steve Jones"]I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function.
I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?[/QUOTE]
|
Work on PAM Support?, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Feb 8 18:23:52 2006
|
Stefan (or any others):
Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers from Sun and looking |
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Feb 8 18:34:43 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][QUOTE="Steve Jones"]I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the
forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?[/QUOTE]
|
|
Re: Work on PAM Support?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 9 09:12:44 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers
from Sun and looking at sample code.[/quote]
|