| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1833
|
Fri May 19 14:01:34 2006 |
 | Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Request | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | Re: Re: $datetime display |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | Apologies for being so dense but try as I might I cannot get the $datetime display to show only Day, Month , Year,hour and minutes, NOT seconds.
I dont nee the seconds display!
Could you please clarify the systax for me. |
Can you show me the elogd.cfg syntax you try to use? |
Hi There!
See in bold below (I'm sure this is me being dense, so thanks for quick reply)
Fergus
Theme = default
Comment = Recording work carried out on any core system
Time format = %B %d, %Y, %H:%M
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type, Status |
|
1835
|
Mon May 22 10:37:36 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Request | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | Re: Re: $datetime display |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | Apologies for being so dense but try as I might I cannot get the $datetime display to show only Day, Month , Year,hour and minutes, NOT seconds.
I dont nee the seconds display!
Could you please clarify the systax for me. |
Can you show me the elogd.cfg syntax you try to use? |
Hi There!
See in bold below (I'm sure this is me being dense, so thanks for quick reply)
Fergus
Theme = default
Comment = Recording work carried out on any core system
Time format = %B %d, %Y, %H:%M
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type, Status |
What about
Time format = %B %d, %Y, %H:%M:%S |
Thanks, did the trick and working perfectly (I was being dense!) |
|
1844
|
Mon Jun 5 14:19:52 2006 |
 | Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Info | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | 'Click through' order of elog enteries |
Hi There,
When you find a set of records in ELOG and then 'click through' the returned list it runs through then in order of ID. - I s there a way to modify this behaviour?
Many Thanks
Fergus |
|
1888
|
Wed Aug 9 12:25:57 2006 |
 | Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | V2.6.2-169 | Retain original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog |
Hi There,
We have a number of weblogs where we regular archive off 'completed' entries to a separate archive weblog:
Is it possible to retain the original ELOG id when moving an entry to an archive weblog, or have a locked field which holds the original id which we could subsequently reference in the archive?
Many Thanks
Fergus |
|
2043
|
Mon Nov 6 17:36:35 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | | | Re: Spell check |
| David Egolf wrote: | Sorry if this has been asked.
Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
Thanks,
David Egolf |
I find that the Google spell checker works very well in IE6. |
|
2084
|
Mon Nov 20 16:23:37 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1734 | $long_name in Moptions |
Hi,
Is there a way of having $long_name in 'Moptions'?
We use ELOG (amongst other things!) to allocate work out to Developers (who are all configured as ELOG users) I would like to use 'checkbox' functionality to allocate out a task to more than one developer. Currently only a single developer is chosen from a drop down list.
Thanks
Fergus |
|
2086
|
Tue Nov 21 09:44:30 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1734 | Re: Re: $long_name in Moptions |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | Hi,
Is there a way of having $long_name in 'Moptions'?
We use ELOG (amongst other things!) to allocate work out to Developers (who are all configured as ELOG users) I would like to use 'checkbox' functionality to allocate out a task to more than one developer. Currently only a single developer is chosen from a drop down list. |
This was not possible until now, so I implemented the option
Type <attribute> = muserlist
which gives you checkboxes (= multi-userlist) for all users instead of a drop down list. This feature is implemented starting from revision 1758 and it will be contained in the next release of elog. |
WowThat was quick, I'll implement this morning. Many thanks for introducing this, ELOG is such a good tool.
Many Thanks
Fergus |
|
2087
|
Tue Nov 21 11:14:48 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1734 | Re: Re: $long_name in Moptions |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | Hi,
Is there a way of having $long_name in 'Moptions'?
We use ELOG (amongst other things!) to allocate work out to Developers (who are all configured as ELOG users) I would like to use 'checkbox' functionality to allocate out a task to more than one developer. Currently only a single developer is chosen from a drop down list. |
This was not possible until now, so I implemented the option
Type <attribute> = muserlist
which gives you checkboxes (= multi-userlist) for all users instead of a drop down list. This feature is implemented starting from revision 1758 and it will be contained in the next release of elog. |
Hi Stefan, apologies if I am being a bit dense (!) When I download the latest windows binary it extracts to ELOG V2.6.2-1749. Where could I get revision 1758 >
Thanks in advance
Fergus |