ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
458
|
Wed Dec 3 06:32:09 2003 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Request | Windows | | whishlist direct shortcut to select a files or folder (not http) | whishlist
an entry like
file:///E:/Dossier\!!shorcut
will open IE with these current adresse
Stef could you add a logbook
'wishlist'
'subgroup' contribution/icons |
460
|
Wed Dec 3 14:57:05 2003 |
| Etienne Van Caillie | etienne.vancaillie@mba.be | Request | Windows | | Re: whishlist direct shortcut to select a files or folder (not http) | > > an entry like
> > file:///E:/Dossier\!!shorcut
> > will open IE with these current adresse
>
> Yes it does, and what is your question?
>
> > Stef could you add a logbook
> > 'wishlist'
> > 'subgroup' contribution/icons
>
> If you have any icons, just put it under the contributions logbook. There
> are only few entries, so no deed to make a subgroup.
>
> As for wishlist, start with the "Forum" Logbook. If a wish gets "accepted",
> I put it on the official web page.
sorry for my 'stupid' question please delete this entry :) |
68039
|
Fri Jul 3 21:26:32 2015 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Info | Linux | 3.1.0-5be245e | Re: ELOG and Gmail? | Using stunnel4 and the 3.1.0 version of elog, I was able to use gmail smtp without the use of iptables.
In my elogd.cfg I chose:
SMTP username = <gmailusername>@gmail.com
SMTP Password = <The hash produced with the perl statement posted by Christopher Lee>
SMTP host = 127.0.0.1
And in /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf:
[elogssl]
client = yes
accept = 127.0.0.1:25
connect = smtp.gmail.com:465
verify = 2
CApath = /etc/ssl/certs
FInally, run sudo stunnel4. |
68040
|
Tue Jul 7 21:57:04 2015 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.0-5be245e | Customized email subject line for an updated entry | Hi,
The default email subject line for a new entry is: "New ELOG entry", and the default email subject line for an edited entry is: "Updated ELOG entry". However when we set "Use Email Subject", both new entries and the updated entries use the same email subject. Is there an equivalent of "Use Email Heading Edit" for the subject line? I tried "Use Email Subject Edit", to no avail.
Thanks in advance,
e. |
68044
|
Wed Jul 15 21:30:47 2015 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.0-5be245e | Re: Customized email subject line for an updated entry | Since there were no responses, I decided to make good use of the fact that the software is thankfully open-sourced. I modified elogd.c and added just a couple of lines to get what I wanted.
22245,22250d22244
< if (old_mail && getcfg(lbs->name, "Use Email Subject Edit", subject, sizeof(subject))) {
< i = build_subst_list(lbs, slist, svalue, attrib, TRUE);
< sprintf(str, "%d", message_id);
< add_subst_list(slist, svalue, "message id", str, &i);
< strsubst_list(subject, sizeof(subject), slist, svalue, i);
< } else
These lines just follow the comment line: /* compose subject from attributes */
Erkcan Ozcan wrote: |
Hi,
The default email subject line for a new entry is: "New ELOG entry", and the default email subject line for an edited entry is: "Updated ELOG entry". However when we set "Use Email Subject", both new entries and the updated entries use the same email subject. Is there an equivalent of "Use Email Heading Edit" for the subject line? I tried "Use Email Subject Edit", to no avail.
Thanks in advance,
e.
|
|
68629
|
Sat Jun 10 07:05:24 2017 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.3-aded4ae | Server dropping SSL connection while uploading large files | Hi,
I am having trouble with uploading large (>0.5MB) files to elog. We click on upload and in a couple of seconds, the webbrowser complains that the server has dropped the connection.
Following the suggestions I found on these forums (https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66753), I increased the timeout.tv_sec to 30 in three locations in elogd.c, but this did not help.
The problem is present in my old elog installation (from ~2 years ago), as well as the latest git snapshot from bitbucket that I cloned on June 10, 2017.
PS: Upload seems to work for non-secure configuration. It still takes a while to load, but it completes. However we prefer to use secure connections ( SSL = 1 ).
PS: Using nmap I looked at the latency to the relevant port, it can be as high as 0.5sec, but most often it is shorter.
Cheers,
e. |
68634
|
Wed Jun 28 19:37:10 2017 |
| Erkcan Ozcan | erkcan@gmail.com | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.3-aded4ae | Re: Server dropping SSL connection while uploading large files | Hi,
Could someone at least suggest how I could debug this problem myself? If I know where to start, perhaps I can fix it myself and contribute to the software.
Best,
e.
Erkcan Ozcan wrote: |
Hi,
I am having trouble with uploading large (>0.5MB) files to elog. We click on upload and in a couple of seconds, the webbrowser complains that the server has dropped the connection.
Following the suggestions I found on these forums (https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66753), I increased the timeout.tv_sec to 30 in three locations in elogd.c, but this did not help.
The problem is present in my old elog installation (from ~2 years ago), as well as the latest git snapshot from bitbucket that I cloned on June 10, 2017.
PS: Upload seems to work for non-secure configuration. It still takes a while to load, but it completes. However we prefer to use secure connections ( SSL = 1 ).
PS: Using nmap I looked at the latency to the relevant port, it can be as high as 0.5sec, but most often it is shorter.
Cheers,
e.
|
|
65909
|
Mon Jun 9 15:57:15 2008 |
| Erik Iverson | eiverson@ornl.gov | Question | Windows | | Re: Mass postings |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
mike cianci wrote: |
I am setting this up as instrument log in a multi-hospital system, where there will be multiple instruments, in multiple departments, at multiple facilities.
I am using the "Top Group" function to keep the books separate so operators from one instrument/department/facility don't contaminate another instrument/department/facility's logbook.
What I am wondering is there someway to set it up so that a system wide manager could post a message to 5 individual logbooks for 5 identical instruments at 5 different locations all at once (one ELOG server)?
I hope this made sense. Thank you for your help.
|
Unfortunately this is not possible at the moment. You would have to use the menu command "copy to" and enable it for the admin user. Then you create your entry, and click on "copy to" once for each location you want to copy this entry.
|
I found a way to get this to work. Define a "Messages" logbook for the messages to be broadcast. None of the user installations need access to it. Use "Execute new = " to execute a script calling the elog command line client passing the message on to each target logbook. Example:
--- elogd.cfg snippet begin ---
[Messages]
...
Execute new = mass_post.sh $text &
--- elogd.cfg snippet end ---
--- mass_post.sh begin ---
#!/bin/sh
elog -a Sender="System Administrator" -l "Logbook 1" $@
elog -a Sender="System Administrator" -l "Logbook 2" $@
elog -a Sender="System Administrator" -l "Logbook 3" $@
--- mass_post.sh end ---
The $@ expands to all the command line arguments, so the $text field, with all its spaces, gets passed correctly. Sorry I showed you the example in bash/linux rather than in Windows, but I don't know Windows real well - you're better off translating into it yourself than my untested attempts. The one thing I can tell you is that the "Execute new" command must include the "background fork". In Linux this is provided by the & at the end of the line. In windows you'll need to use
Execute new = start "dummy" /min mass_post.bat
to background the process. This is ESSENTIAL. Without backgrounding the batch file, the elogd server will go into an infinite loop. The parent process will wait for the child process to exit before continuing. elogd is single-threaded, so the child process cannot start until the parent process has completed its current task (which is waiting for the child process to exit).
You may need to tweak the above a little if you want to pass variable attributes to the script instead of defining them all in the script itself.
|
|