| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1627
|
Wed Jan 25 08:24:28 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1 |
> Here I am again... I built and installed v2.6.1 also on a different system, this time on linux; i tried both
with the
> existing cfg file and with the new cfg.
> Choosing "configuration", I still only see the current logbook configuration file section with "Save" and "cancel"
> buttons, no access to global config whatsoever; the same as I saw on windows version. I tried version 2.6.1-1622.
I tried again, using the configuration file from the distribution (elog:1627/1). Hitting "config", I see the picture
attached (elog:1627/2). So it's a mystery why it is different in your case... |
| Attachment 1: elogd.cfg
|
[global]
port = 8080
[demo]
Theme = default
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Options Category = General, Hardware, Software, Network, Other
Extendable Options = Category
Required Attributes = Author, Type
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type
|
| Attachment 2: Capture.gif
|
|
|
1626
|
Wed Jan 25 01:08:06 2006 |
| Giorgio Croci Candiani | g.crocic@libero.it | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1 |
> > I just installed v.2.6.1 coming from the previous 2.6.0 (on Win2000)
> > When I access the "configuration" function from a logbook, in the cfg page I only see two buttons in the header
> > (save or cancel); in the previous version I saw more buttons there ("global config", "create new logbook" and so
> > on), so here I'm unable to access global configuration or logbook management (except for current logbook options).
>
> I tried to reproduce your problem, but could not. In my windows installation it looks fine. You only see the
> (save and cancel) buttons only if you go to "Change [global]", otherwise you see the "Change [global]", "Delete
> this logbook" etc. buttons. Have you tried with the default elogd.cfg which comes from the distribution?
Here I am again... I built and installed v2.6.1 also on a different system, this time on linux; i tried both with the
existing cfg file and with the new cfg.
Choosing "configuration", I still only see the current logbook configuration file section with "Save" and "cancel"
buttons, no access to global config whatsoever; the same as I saw on windows version. I tried version 2.6.1-1622.
Regards
Giorgio |
|
1625
|
Tue Jan 24 22:52:48 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | 2.6.1 | Re: Suggestion additional ElCodes |
| T. Ribbrock wrote: | However, there are two things I'm missing:
- Headings
It would be great to have a range of [H1][/H1], [H2][/H2], ... tags that map directly to their HTML counterparts (and have buttons, of course...  ). That makes structuring an entry much easier in my opinion (and the output is easier to deal with for tools like html2ps) and I'm really missing those.
- Tables
This one is probably more difficult to add, but support for simple tables would be enough. But this is more a "nice to have"...
|
Yes, I missed tables myself already. The headings I just put into the current SVN version (see this forum for how it works). Tables are a bit harder to implement and will come later. Do you have a proposal for a possible syntax? A 1:1 relation to HTML would look like this:
|
[tr][th]heading1[/th][th]heading2[/th][/tr]
[tr][td]data1[/td][td]data2[/td][/tr]
|
But that does not look very sexy to me. Maybe somehting like
|
| heading 1 | heading 2 | heading 3
| |
| data 1 | data 2 | data 3
|
this looks a bit like the "pipe" mode from a Wiki
what do you think? |
|
1624
|
Tue Jan 24 14:43:19 2006 |
 | T. Ribbrock | emgaron@gmx.net | Request | Linux | 2.6.1 | Suggestion additional ElCodes |
I have to say, now that I'm finally on 2.6.x, I grew really fond of the ElCode stuff - great addition! It saves a lot of straight HTML typing for me... THANKS!
However, there are two things I'm missing:
- Headings
It would be great to have a range of , , ... tags that map directly to their HTML counterparts (and have buttons, of course... ). That makes structuring an entry much easier in my opinion (and the output is easier to deal with for tools like html2ps) and I'm really missing those.
- Tables
This one is probably more difficult to add, but support for simple tables would be enough. But this is more a "nice to have"...
|
|
1623
|
Tue Jan 24 14:39:21 2006 |
 | Bertram Metz | bmetz@sbs.com | Bug report | Linux | V2.6.0-bet | Re: Attachments in duplicated entries |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Bertram Metz wrote: | The duplicate command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments. If attachments in a duplicated entry are deleted, the original attachment files are deleted as well and cannot be accessed anymore within the original entry.
My suggestion is to copy the attached files too and to use file names of the copies in the duplicated entry. |
I chaned it such that attachments are removed from the duplicated entry, which was easier to implement. I hope this is ok as well. The change is in SVN revision 1584. |
Yes, that's ok for me.
Thank you very much Stefan.
Best Regards,
Bertram |
|
1622
|
Tue Jan 24 08:11:13 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | 2.6.0b5 | Re: Quicklink does not work for one field |
| mark james wrote: |
| mark james wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| mark james wrote: | | I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work. |
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release. |
Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?
Mark |
In fact now the dropdown seems to be working but when I 'tick' an entry, it is not being written to the ascii file. |
Can you try V2.6.1-1634? I fixed several issues with ticking entries coming from "MOptions" lists. |
|
1621
|
Mon Jan 23 18:35:52 2006 |
| mark james | mark@majames.com | Question | | 2.6.0b5 | Re: Quicklink does not work for one field |
| mark james wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| mark james wrote: | | I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work. |
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release. |
Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?
Mark |
In fact now the dropdown seems to be working but when I 'tick' an entry, it is not being written to the ascii file. |
|
1620
|
Mon Jan 23 17:32:20 2006 |
| mark james | mark@majames.com | Question | | 2.6.0b5 | Re: Quicklink does not work for one field |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| mark james wrote: | | I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work. |
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release. |
Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?
Mark |