Elogd crashes when submitting replies, posted by Cliff Shaw on Thu Dec 10 16:05:59 2009
|
Hi Stefan,
I recently installed the latest Elog 2.7.8 revision 2277 after running Elog 2.7.7 revision 2246 for several months without any problems. However
once I submit an entry by using the Reply command Elog crashes and Windows XP reports an error message screen. This also stops the elogd service. |
Elogd crashes when closing more than ten entries, posted by Cliff Shaw on Fri Mar 12 08:18:06 2010
|
Hi Stefan,
I have noticed a problem when closing multiple log entries i.e entries which have more than 10 threads. I use Select -> Click the box that appears
next to the thread I wish to close -> Edit. |
Copy & Move To in Spanish, posted by Marimar Rodriguez on Mon Aug 11 20:35:16 2008
|
Hi,
when I choose the Spanish language, the command Copy To isn't allowed. I have had to change the language file and change the line:
Copy To = Copiar a |
Elogd.exe Crashes When There are too Many Replies to Replies..., posted by Christopher Jones on Sun Oct 12 08:37:00 2003
|
Hi,
We have been using Elog successfully as a shiftlog book for over a month
|
Re: Elogd.exe Crashes When There are too Many Replies to Replies..., posted by Christopher Jones on Fri Nov 21 07:59:50 2003
|
> I found a stack overflow if there are too many replies. This has been fixed in
> the current CVS verson of elogd.c and will be incorporated into the next release.
|
Use Email From not Working as Before..., posted by Christopher Jones on Mon Sep 13 20:44:35 2004
|
Hi,
We just recently upgraded from an older version of Elog to the latest and
|
Where do I find information on setting up the text area as a template?, posted by Chris Jennings on Thu Aug 23 14:30:56 2012
|
I would like to set up the text are as a template. The documentation indicates this can be done however I am unable to find reference to how it is accomplished. |
Sort by date prior to 2002, posted by Chris Jennings on Tue Sep 16 17:59:27 2014
|
I have an attribute formatted as a date (but not labeled as date) and is sorted as second priority. The sort works fine until I enter a date older than
Jan 1st 2002. When I do this it is sorted as the latest. Is this a bug or simply not designed to use dates this old?
Thanks in advance, |