ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
2082
|
Sat Nov 18 11:19:14 2006 |
| ather khan | ather.khan@cpjeddah.com | Question | | | Attributes according to users |
Hi,
Is it possible to have certain attributtes available to certain user in one log boolk.
We have log book where the supervisor assign jobs to employees and we want only supervisor to have assign to attributes available and others only to view it.
thanks,
Ather |
66151
|
Wed Jan 14 19:52:04 2009 |
| Yoichi Aso | asoy01@gmail.com | Question | All | 2.7.5 | Multiple keyword search |
Hi,
I have a question regarding how to perform a multiple-keyword search.
For example, when I want to find entries which contain two keywords "abc" and "def" in the body text but in an unknown order,
one way I came up with was to use a regular expression like this.
(abc|def).*(abc|def)
But this will also match entries containing two "abc" or two "def".
The following one will eliminate this problem.
(abc.*def)|(def.*abc)
But when I use more than two keywords, this type of regular expressions becomes very long (because I have to list all the permutations of the keywords) and it may not fit in the search text field (there seems to be a limit on the length of the search text).
Is there any way to allow multiple-keyword search easily ?
It would be nice if I can just enter two or more keywords separated by white spaces and elog finds entries containing all the keywords.
Thanks,
Yoichi |
68803
|
Fri May 18 08:04:37 2018 |
| Pasti | arvzie1@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 3.1.3 | Enabling SSL |
Hi all,
I'm following config guide and so far so good. The only issue I run into is when enabling SSL.
Guide says - One can replace this certificate and key with a real certificate to avoid browser pop-up windows warning about the self-signed certificate.
Can you please tell me a more details regards this part? I have acquired security certificate and replaced contents of SSL folder.
Now elogd.exe gets error 1067.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks! |
68358
|
Tue Jul 12 21:23:13 2016 |
| Austin Reid | arreid3@ncsu.edu | Bug report | Other | 3.1.1- | Email report has incorrect pictures |
My group uses the precompiled Debian binary, and I use ELCode to format my log reports. (I've found it to be the easiest way to generate inline images)
Yesterday, I submitted an entry that renders correctly on the elog itself, but the email report that was sent to my collaborators was quite confusing, because every picture in it was the same. Interestingly, all the images used inline in the report were attached to the original, but they were stripped of their context.
I've attached screen shots of both reports. |
Attachment 1: emailedversion.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: okversion.jpg
|
|
1920
|
Sun Sep 3 21:57:00 2006 |
| Arno Teunisse | arno.teunisse@simac.nl | Question | Windows | | Attribute and checkbox |
In the screen shots I see checkboxes before the attributes. How can I do that ??
In the doc I saw Options <attribute> = boolean. But that creates a checkbox in the fill in form after the attribute. See second attached picture. The first attached picture shows what I want but I can only get the result in the second picture. Can anybody help me in this one. ( Is there an option checked for the attributes ? |
Attachment 1: untitled.JPG
|
|
Attachment 2: untitled1.JPG
|
|
68260
|
Tue Feb 16 23:19:31 2016 |
| Arno Teunisse | arno.teunisse@simac.com | Info | Windows | ELOG V3.1.1-3f3 | Find empty attributes |
Want to use the find function from ELOG to search for empty fields ( Attributes that are not defined )
How to do that ?
Could not find it in the Forum.
Greetings Arno Teunisse
|
1870
|
Wed Jul 5 00:18:29 2006 |
| Arno Teunisse | arno.teunisse@hetnet.nl | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-6 | Re: Corrupt page link |
Ulrich Trüssel wrote: | If a loggbook contains more than one page of entries, above and under the list are links for changing the page by number (or privous / last and all) conatining links looking like "http://localhost:8080/logbook/page2?mode=mode". This is the correct link and will work until Version 2.6.1-5!
In Version 2.6.1-6 the link is corrupted and look always like "http://localhost:8080/logbook/pag" |
In this version, the above is true. It also has corrupted entries when clicking : Full | Summary | Threaded.
On MSExplorer and Firefox only a part of the link is shown in the left-down corner of the browser :
http://localhost:8080/?mo
No matter what button you click.
It should be : http://localhost:8080/?mode=full
http://localhost:8080/?mode=Summary
http://localhost:8080/?mode=Attachments
I'v tested is with the default elogd.cfg file which comes with the installation.
Something is going wrong here.
When importing a csv text file the above is introduced also.
Just installed the previous version :
====================================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built May 24 2006, 08:59:09 revision 1688
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...
And the problem is gone. !!!!
problem is in version :
==========================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG1]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built Jun 13 2006, 08:43:21 revision 1691
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...
I love elog , for it's simplicity,
but will not upgrade to the lastest release untill this is solved. |
1921
|
Sun Sep 3 23:16:31 2006 |
| Arno Teunisse | arno.teunisse@hetnet.nl | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-6 | Re: Corrupt page link |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Arno Teunisse wrote: | Just installed the previous version :
====================================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built May 24 2006, 08:59:09 revision 1688
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...
And the problem is gone. !!!!
problem is in version :
==========================
[C:\Program Files\ELOG1]elogd -c elogd.cfg
elogd 2.6.1 built Jun 13 2006, 08:43:21 revision 1691
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...
|
Thanks for your detailed information. The hint with the two different revisions heally helped. I fixed that in revision 1695, and made an intermediate release 2.6.1-7. This will fix the problem. Can you please check that this is working? |
Sorry for my ( very ) late answer , But yes the problem is GONE after installing the new release? Thanks. |