| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1265
|
Thu Jul 14 12:47:06 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | | short/long_name should point the same user | .. I mean that if I use:
Restrict edit = 1
; preset author and email
Preset Author = $short_name
Preset Author Email = $user_email
Preset on reply Author = $short_name
Preset on reply Author Email = $user_email
Subst on reply subject = Re: $subject
; these attributes cannot be changed
Locked Attributes = Author, Author Email
and then I change Preset Author to be "$long_name" Elog does not permit the autor to edit an old post of its own ...
It is not able to argue that short and long name are the same person..
Yes I know, you'll ask me why I should change it .. the anwer is.. I don't have to, but (as I could do it logically) I'd like to be able to do..
In my case I changed it by error, people inserted entries and now I restored the correct one .. so now I have to unlock the attribute and change every Author by hand as admin
 |
|
1264
|
Wed Jul 13 15:09:48 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | | [code] should be a sort of <CDATA > | Using the [code] elocode should be intended also to preserve the tagged text from beeing parsed as html or elcode itself ..
this is an example:
| Quote: | Note that, for security reasons, you should check the MD5 FINGERPRINT of the SSL certificate issued by the server agaist the following one:
MD5 Fingerprint = 23:A7:AD:33:3C:08:BE:2A:62:6E:85:DF:B8:00:23:40
Thank you |
|
|
1263
|
Wed Jul 13 10:12:38 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO |
Really? Can you point me to a common web site using this? I would really like to see how other people use this.
|
I can't remember just now a web site using it .. what I mean is that "multiple" attribute for the "select" tag is a standard for the web (it's not an IE extension or so on ..) so every web browser implements it.
It's normally used, for example, when you fill a form describing your attitudes, here you can often choose from a select box a number of interest you are concerded.. but it is only an example
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog  |
Ok, I put it on my wishlist. If more than one person asks for this, I will implement it. Unfortunately it's not only putting a multiple into the HTML page, it's also a different way how multiple selections are passed in the POST form and their decoding, so it will be an hour or two of work for me. |
Yes I know, uhm... if you point me to the right piece of code to be adjusted I can see if I'll be able to do the job |
|
1262
|
Tue Jul 12 17:41:30 2005 |
| Gary Clayson | imppster@gmail.com | Request | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Suppress Email notification checkbox |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Gary Clayson wrote: | | Hello All. Stefan, would it be possible to add one more option to the Suppress Default flag? I'd appreciate a setting that would suppress emails being sent and remove the option from the page. Or, has this been accomplished? And, if so, what is that setting. Thanks in advance!! Keep up the great work. |
I added
Suppress default = 3
which always suppresses email notifications. The addition is under CVS and will be included in the next release.
- Stefan |
Hello Stefan. I used this setting with the beta2 version and it works great. THANX!!! Many kudos to you for an elegant solution to the logging 'problem'. |
|
1261
|
Tue Jul 12 15:19:07 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO |
Really? Can you point me to a common web site using this? I would really like to see how other people use this.
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
Ok, I put it on my wishlist. If more than one person asks for this, I will implement it. Unfortunately it's not only putting a multiple into the HTML page, it's also a different way how multiple selections are passed in the POST form and their decoding, so it will be an hour or two of work for me. |
|
1260
|
Tue Jul 12 10:15:30 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug fix | Linux | 2.5.9 | Re: elog utility for submission used wrong 'Host:' in POST header | > The 'elog' utility for commandline submission used wrong 'Host:' in POST header.
> The host listed after 'Host:' should be the host where the server runs, not the
> localhost (see patch below).
>
> $ diff -u elog.c_20050711 elog.c
> --- elog.c_20050711 Mon Jul 11 18:54:20 2005
> +++ elog.c Mon Jul 11 18:55:31 2005
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
> sprintf(request + strlen(request), "%s/%d?cmd=download", experiment, message_id);
> strcat(request, " HTTP/1.0\r\n");
>
> - sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host_name);
> + sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host);
> sprintf(request + strlen(request), "User-Agent: ELOG\r\n");
>
> first = 1;
> @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@
> strcat(request, " HTTP/1.0\r\n");
>
> sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=%s\r\n", boundary);
> - sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host_name);
> + sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host);
> sprintf(request + strlen(request), "User-Agent: ELOG\r\n");
> sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Content-Length: %d\r\n", content_length);
This is not completally true IMHO .. better, it is, but it is not the only problem.
Elog seems to speak HTML/1.0, where "host:" is not implemented ... Since ELOG does not support Vhosts I think the right beaviour is to remove the "Host:" header at all ...
On the other hand it should replay with an error when a bogus client tries to speak HTML/1.0 specifing "host:",
and (the wrost case) when the bogus client says to speak HTML/1.1 and doesnt provide the required "Host:" header ...
Yes .. elog will ignore it, but it is an RFC requirement for HTML/1.1 ! |
|
1259
|
Mon Jul 11 19:04:38 2005 |
| Heiko Scheit | h.scheit@mpi-hd.mpg.de | Bug fix | Linux | 2.5.9 | elog utility for submission used wrong 'Host:' in POST header | The 'elog' utility for commandline submission used wrong 'Host:' in POST header.
The host listed after 'Host:' should be the host where the server runs, not the
localhost (see patch below).
$ diff -u elog.c_20050711 elog.c
--- elog.c_20050711 Mon Jul 11 18:54:20 2005
+++ elog.c Mon Jul 11 18:55:31 2005
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
sprintf(request + strlen(request), "%s/%d?cmd=download", experiment, message_id);
strcat(request, " HTTP/1.0\r\n");
- sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host_name);
+ sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host);
sprintf(request + strlen(request), "User-Agent: ELOG\r\n");
first = 1;
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@
strcat(request, " HTTP/1.0\r\n");
sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=%s\r\n", boundary);
- sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host_name);
+ sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Host: %s\r\n", host);
sprintf(request + strlen(request), "User-Agent: ELOG\r\n");
sprintf(request + strlen(request), "Content-Length: %d\r\n", content_length); |
|
1258
|
Mon Jul 11 14:35:00 2005 |
 | Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Here I am again
My goal is to put a "Co-Authors" Attribute in my logbook, giving the possibility to other people in the control room to have credits about an entry... I added a "Co-Author" attribute, but It shold permit a "multliple" selection (a checkbox is not good) ... the perfect solution would be to add the attribute "multiple" to the <select> tag, and filling the elog Attribute value with a comma separated list of the selections ...
tnx in advance |
Have you tried MOptions ... which gives you check boxes where more than one can be selected?
I presume you have, but you really would prefer a multi-selection box instead of multiple check boxes . Well, let's make a deal: if you explain everybody how to do a selection in a multi-select box (with all the Shift-Click, CTRL-Click, and this under different operating systems), I will implement it  |
a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO 
My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
|