ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67139
|
Thu Oct 27 14:05:35 2011 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | All | 2.9.0 | undesired side effect of using an attribute "Entry" | If you use an attribute "Entry" then the internal variable "entry time" will expand to the last value of
"$Entry"+" time", e.g. if you use it in "Thread display = $entry time, ..."
One side effect is, that the logbook selection page defaults to use
Last submission = $entry time by $author
Which then expands to an undesired result.
This is not really a bug, rather something you'll need to keep in the back of your mind. |
67146
|
Wed Nov 9 20:15:38 2011 |
| Steve Nahn | nahn@mit.edu | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0 | Global Synchronization with 2.9.0 | Hi
I just updated my mirror server, which I just use as a backup to my main server, to 2.9.0 and found that after logging in (the selection page is not protected, but the individual logbooks are) and coming back to the selection page I no longer get the "Synchronize all logbooks" even though I am an admin user. The relevant code is in elogd.c in the show_selection_page() routine:
/* only admin user sees synchronization link */
if (is_admin_user("global", getparam("unm"))) {
rsprintf("<tr>\n");
rsprintf("<td colspan=13 class=\"seltitle\">\n");
rsprintf("<a href=\"?cmd=Synchronize\">%s</a></td>\n", loc("Synchronize all logbooks"));
rsprintf("</tr>\n");
}
what is happening is that after logging in to a logbook and coming back to the selection page, the "unm" parameter is not set, so getparam("unm") returns NULL, who clearly is not in the admin user list. The strange thing is that in an individual logbook the unm (and uname) parameters are working fine, and I have admin rights - can change the global config file, do an individual synchronization, etc. It is just from the selection page that the unm parameter is not working.
In fact, I commented out the if statement above, just to see if I could get synchronized using the link, and that failed too, with a message "No user name supplied for remote access" even though I do have a "mirror user" statement in my config. Again, if I do each one individually it all works. In addition, the cron synchronization (i.e. mirror cron) also works fine.
Obviously this isn't crucial, just a pain that can be worked around, but if anyone has any ideas I'd be glad to hear them.
Steve
PS Another feature request: when you forget to set an icon in this forum and then use the "back button" it shouldn't force you to rewrite the whole message over again! |
67160
|
Wed Jan 11 22:19:49 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 | After patching a windows 7 computer with MS12-006, can no longer connect to elog, get page cannot be displayed
See
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584 |
67161
|
Thu Jan 12 19:34:28 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
67162
|
Thu Jan 12 19:37:52 2012 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
Allen wrote: |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
Also, strangely, I am able to use the elog forum page https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum while TLS 1.0 is checked. I notice the version number is 2.9.0-2425, while we are using 2.9.0-2396, so wondering if this is fixed in this newer version. |
67163
|
Fri Jan 13 14:33:04 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.0-2396 | Re: Elog does not work after installing MS12-006/MS12-012 on Win 7 |
Allen wrote: |
Allen wrote: |
A little more information here
We are running elog on an Ubuntu server
Elog was working fine, then, on a windows 7 machine, MS12-006 was installed, rebooted, and could no longer connect to the elog web page.
Discovered that in Internet Explorer 8, by unchecking the use TLS 1.0 in options advanced tab, and making sure that SSL 3.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 were checked, that the page once again worked. I'm guessing the elog does not support SSL 3.0, otherwise, I assume I would have to uncheck that as well. Things do appear to still work on XP, thus far, only Windows 7 appears to break. While we have a work around, ideally we would like to see a bug fix so that (for legacy reasons), elog will still work with TLS 1.0 on Windows 7.
|
Also, strangely, I am able to use the elog forum page https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum while TLS 1.0 is checked. I notice the version number is 2.9.0-2425, while we are using 2.9.0-2396, so wondering if this is fixed in this newer version.
|
The forum does not use TLS, but has Apache in front of it which works as a proxy. So TLS is actually handled by Apache, which might have a newer implementation of TLS. The ELOG version number certainly does not make a difference, I did not touch the SSL functionality in a while. But when you compile ELOG on your Ubunto server, you can maybe play with different versions of OpenSSL and see if that changes anything?
- Stefan |
67164
|
Wed Jan 25 10:07:16 2012 |
| Christian Herzog | herzog@phys.ethz.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.0 | problems with https in Chrome and IE | Hi,
we're evaluating elog right now at the Physics Department of ETH Zurich and I'm trying to come up with a good config. One of the first steps of course was to enable SSL/https. With http, all tested browsers work fine, but with https at least Google Chrome 16 and IE 9 do not get past the "unknown certificate" warning and I see "TCP connection broken" errors in the log file. Firefox however works fine. Same behavior on Linux, Mac and Windows (given the browser in question is available). elog server is running on Lucid.
Any idea?
thanks,
-Christian |
67182
|
Fri Feb 10 11:54:35 2012 |
| Olaf Kasten | olaf.kasten@deutschebahn.com | Bug report | Linux | Windows | 2.9.0 | ssl problems | Hi there,
I have a connection problem with an actual elog installation. Many Browsers like as Chrome, Firefox and IE don't connect to the elog server with ssl = 1 in elogd.cfg.
I tested with Firefox 3.6 and IE 7 installations and there are no problems.
I guess it's a bug. Does someone have a suggestion to solve that problem?
Thx. Olaf |
|