Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 704 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject
  67510   Tue May 21 14:33:09 2013 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chBug reportWindowsUnknownRe: Application failed to initialize properly

Norm wrote:

I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version.  Around 2008 I believe.  I then received an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version.  I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received the same message.  Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday.  I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am receiving this error??

 Hi Norm. I have not much experience with windows, but I can give you my two cent on how to proceed:

  • Check the old elogd version. It is shown at the bottom of your elog web page (this forum shows ELOG V2.9.2-2475).
  • Copy your logbook data to a different PC, maybe your office PC.
  • Then compile the latest elog on your office PC, run it with the copied data and access it as http://localhost:8080 (or whatever port number you are using)
  • If it is still crashing: re-compile it using "make debug" and run it from a debugger (I don't know any C-debugger for Windows). Post the precise error message.
 
Detect language » English
 

Good luck!

  67512   Sat May 25 16:09:58 2013 Reply Normnormthompson@yahoo.comBug reportWindowsUnknownRe: Application failed to initialize properly

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

Norm wrote:

I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version.  Around 2008 I believe.  I then received an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version.  I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received the same message.  Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday.  I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am receiving this error??

 Hi Norm. I have not much experience with windows, but I can give you my two cent on how to proceed:

  • Check the old elogd version. It is shown at the bottom of your elog web page (this forum shows ELOG V2.9.2-2475).
  • Copy your logbook data to a different PC, maybe your office PC.
  • Then compile the latest elog on your office PC, run it with the copied data and access it as http://localhost:8080 (or whatever port number you are using)
  • If it is still crashing: re-compile it using "make debug" and run it from a debugger (I don't know any C-debugger for Windows). Post the precise error message.
 
Detect language » English
 

Good luck!

 Thanks for the reply.  I just got back from a business trip and I will try this ASAP.  Thanks and I will be posting the error message.

  67519   Sat Jun 1 20:20:03 2013 Reply Normnormthompson@yahoo.comBug reportWindowsUnknownRe: Application failed to initialize properly

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

Norm wrote:

I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version.  Around 2008 I believe.  I then received an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version.  I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received the same message.  Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday.  I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am receiving this error??

 Hi Norm. I have not much experience with windows, but I can give you my two cent on how to proceed:

  • Check the old elogd version. It is shown at the bottom of your elog web page (this forum shows ELOG V2.9.2-2475).
  • Copy your logbook data to a different PC, maybe your office PC.
  • Then compile the latest elog on your office PC, run it with the copied data and access it as http://localhost:8080 (or whatever port number you are using)
  • If it is still crashing: re-compile it using "make debug" and run it from a debugger (I don't know any C-debugger for Windows). Post the precise error message.
 
Detect language » English
 

Good luck!

 Andreas,

 

We do not have the current revision at the bottom of any of the pages.  Is there another way I can find out the current revision I'm using?

 

Thanks!

  67520   Mon Jun 3 13:56:35 2013 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chBug reportWindowsUnknownRe: Application failed to initialize properly

Norm wrote:

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

Norm wrote:

I attempted to install the newest version of elog on our site elog server from an old old version.  Around 2008 I believe.  I then received an application failed to initialize properly 0xc0150002 after installing the newest version.  I then tried installing the Feb 2013 version and received the same message.  Panicked, I rolled back our server to its state yesterday.  I would like to update our elog software, anyone know why I am receiving this error??

 Hi Norm. I have not much experience with windows, but I can give you my two cent on how to proceed:

  • Check the old elogd version. It is shown at the bottom of your elog web page (this forum shows ELOG V2.9.2-2475).
  • Copy your logbook data to a different PC, maybe your office PC.
  • Then compile the latest elog on your office PC, run it with the copied data and access it as http://localhost:8080 (or whatever port number you are using)
  • If it is still crashing: re-compile it using "make debug" and run it from a debugger (I don't know any C-debugger for Windows). Post the precise error message.
 
Detect language » English
 

Good luck!

Andreas,

We do not have the current revision at the bottom of any of the pages.  Is there another way I can find out the current revision I'm using?

Thanks!

Try:

/usr/local/sbin/elogd -h

 
Detect language » English
 

This is the path for Linux, it is likely different on Windows. But you could just run "elogd -h" in the directory where you compile elogd.

It should print out the version in the first line.

  67557   Tue Sep 3 22:21:29 2013 Question Hal Proctorhproctor2@gmail.comBug reportAlllatestFind by date/time

Is it a time zone issue or a setting issue related to the FIND by date / time issue?

It seems to add an hour to each of the time selections once you select SEARCH. see attached pics

Attachment 1: Elog1.jpg
Elog1.jpg
Attachment 2: elog2.jpg
elog2.jpg
  67559   Tue Sep 3 23:03:38 2013 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportAlllatestRe: Find by date/time

Hal Proctor wrote:

Is it a time zone issue or a setting issue related to the FIND by date / time issue?

It seems to add an hour to each of the time selections once you select SEARCH. see attached pics

 One hour adrift at this time of the year sounds like daylight saving.  Or compensation thereof.  What is your computer clock set to (not what time the clock reads)?

Personally I think it rather naughty that [at least older] Windoze automatically sets the clock one hour forward the first reboot after the spring switch forward, and the same in the autumn back.  What if you'd already done it, like all the rest of the clocks in the house?

 

  67563   Wed Sep 11 17:12:52 2013 Reply Hal Proctorhproctor2@gmail.comBug reportAlllatestRe: Find by date/time

David Pilgram wrote:

Hal Proctor wrote:

Is it a time zone issue or a setting issue related to the FIND by date / time issue?

It seems to add an hour to each of the time selections once you select SEARCH. see attached pics

 One hour adrift at this time of the year sounds like daylight saving.  Or compensation thereof.  What is your computer clock set to (not what time the clock reads)?

Personally I think it rather naughty that [at least older] Windoze automatically sets the clock one hour forward the first reboot after the spring switch forward, and the same in the autumn back.  What if you'd already done it, like all the rest of the clocks in the house?

 

 

But it shouldn't use a calculation of any means when the search criteria is entered. I did not choose "LAST DAY", I specifically entered a time, and THAT time should be used for the search.
  67566   Thu Sep 12 22:23:43 2013 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportAlllatestRe: Find by date/time

Hal Proctor wrote:

David Pilgram wrote:

Hal Proctor wrote:

Is it a time zone issue or a setting issue related to the FIND by date / time issue?

It seems to add an hour to each of the time selections once you select SEARCH. see attached pics

 One hour adrift at this time of the year sounds like daylight saving.  Or compensation thereof.  What is your computer clock set to (not what time the clock reads)?

Personally I think it rather naughty that [at least older] Windoze automatically sets the clock one hour forward the first reboot after the spring switch forward, and the same in the autumn back.  What if you'd already done it, like all the rest of the clocks in the house?

 

 

But it shouldn't use a calculation of any means when the search criteria is entered. I did not choose "LAST DAY", I specifically entered a time, and THAT time should be used for the search.

 Some computer programs/OS work with the computer clock as is.  Some make adjustment for Daylight Saving.  Some - Windows comes to mind, actually adjust the computer clock back and forth as Daylight saving ends and begins respectively.  I know this because I have a dual boot computer (I use windoze for AutoCAD and one other Windows-only Java based utility[!]), and when British Summer Time starts, my Linux automatically moves the screen clock forward.  But when I subseqently boot into Windoze, it sets the computer clock forward one hour, so when I then boot back into Linux, the clock is one hour fast.

I therefore suggest again you check what your computer clock *really* is, not what the OS reports it as being, as often they think they're being clever and automatically put in Daylight Saving.

Another test - Stefan and Andreas will be shuddering hard tonight - will be to set your computer clock to December, and see if the effect is still there or has disappeared.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6