Re: Configure default time range in 'Find', posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 24 15:49:28 2015
|
Show last default = 0
always worked, even in my original code. It was just not documented. I added that.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
Hi David,
I was confused because one normally does not need to include a line in the configuration to set a default value. A default is exactly what you get if you don't specify anything in the configuration  But I think I've figured it out: you were overriding the default in the global section for all logbooks and wanted to get back to the default for a particular logbook.
Then another simple solution would have been to remove the line in the global section and add it just in those logbook configurations, where you actually need it.
Anyway, it is good that one can now set the default in the configuration; I agree that this should always be possible.
Cheers
Andreas
| David Pilgram wrote: |
|
Hi Andreas,
Yes, the empty string does exactly that, in the drop down menu, but before my changes, I could not set it to be the default setting in the configuration file. In an archived logbook, it's perfectly possible for "all time" to be the only sensible value. I tried "Show last default = " and various other variants, with no success in getting what I actually required. Also, in the documentation, there was no mention of a way to set the default as "all time", just a list of number of days (week (7), month (31), year (364) etc), which also led me to believe that it was not possible with the existing code.
I've sent an email to Stefan giving my coding changes for information.
|
|
|
Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Thu Jan 19 15:28:16 2023
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived. |
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 19 17:00:37 2023
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Jan 20 10:25:23 2023
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Fri Jan 20 13:12:48 2023
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Edmund Blomley on Mon Jan 23 21:21:56 2023
|
It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 23 22:24:23 2023
|
I added some more references, that's about all I can do. Not sure if that is enough.
Stefan
| Edmund Blomley wrote: |
|
It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Wikipedia Article deleted, posted by Edmund Blomley on Tue Jan 24 11:31:59 2023
|
If I understand it correctly I think it has to be submitted for review with the blue button on that page, just not sure if that should come from your side or someone else
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I added some more references, that's about all I can do. Not sure if that is enough.
Stefan
| Edmund Blomley wrote: |
|
It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|