ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
69029
|
Thu Oct 10 09:27:42 2019 |
| Finn Junker | fj@tvis.net | Question | All | 3.1.4 | Re: Email boolean |
> > > Hello Elog forum
> > >
> > > Is it possible to email boolean statements, like if a checkbox is checked to email certain people?
> > >
> > > My Configuration looks like this but dosn't work:
> > >
> > > Attributes = Bruger, Station, Emne, Status, PM5
> > > Options PM5 = boolean
> > > Email PM5 = fj@tvis.net
> > >
> > > Kind Regards
> > >
> > > Finn
> >
> > I still don't have a solution to the above, but this works:
> >
> > Attributes = Bruger, Station, Emne, Status, PM5
> > ROptions PM5 = Ja
> > Email PM5 Ja = th@tvis.net, fj@tvis.net
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > Finn
>
> You were so close: boolean has the two values "0" (unchecked) and "1" (checked).
>
> Attributes = Bruger, Station, Emne, Status, PM5
> Options PM5 = boolean
> Email PM5 1 = fj@tvis.net
>
> That does work, I've tested it.
Of course :-)
Thank you Andreas
Kind Regards Finn |
69057
|
Sat Nov 9 22:44:23 2019 |
| pavel | temp213@gorodok.net | Request | All | 3.1.4 | Subdirectories in logbooks |
Hello, Is there any way to organize logbooks in some kind of tree with sublogbooks or just have a subdirectories in a logbook directory on the filesystem (treat it as a sublogbook if its name is different from 4 digits of year and pin above all the entries in a list) to structure entires a bit?
|
69058
|
Mon Nov 11 13:09:35 2019 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 3.1.4 | Re: Subdirectories in logbooks |
Just use groups as written in the manual: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html#groups
Stefan
pavel wrote: |
Hello, Is there any way to organize logbooks in some kind of tree with sublogbooks or just have a subdirectories in a logbook directory on the filesystem (treat it as a sublogbook if its name is different from 4 digits of year and pin above all the entries in a list) to structure entires a bit?
|
|
69114
|
Wed Feb 12 13:19:31 2020 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | 3.1.4 | ELOG Null Pointer Dereference Denial-of-Service Vulnerability |
An ELOG vulnerability has been reported, thanks to Asif Akbar of Trend Micro Security Researchworking with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative:
https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-20-252/
The issue has been fixed in the current release 3.1.4-033e292 and in the RPM http://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/RPMS/elog-latest.x86_64.rpm
Best,
Stefan
|
Draft
|
Wed Feb 19 17:43:34 2020 |
| Gino Guenzburger | gino.guenzburger@empa.ch | Bug report | All | 3.1.4 | Re: Find cannot find values with brackets |
Hi Stefan
we are running elog
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I‘m happy to merge the PR after a quick test next week.
Stefan
Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
For demonstration, I created https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/8
The Find search for category aaa(bb) does not give results.
A quick filter corrects the value to aaa\(bb) and delivers results.
I made a simple fix and submitted it as PR to the bitbucket repository.
|
|
|
69177
|
Wed Jul 22 18:11:56 2020 |
| John | secondcomingtechnologies@fastmail.com | Question | All | ELOG V3.1.2-bd7 | How to change name of record Id from $@MID@$. |
Hi Everyone,
I tried using this $@MID@$ in JS as a variable and cannot doit. I researched a little and found no answer on special character usage. If anyone knows, please lemme know. I also tried breifly in Elogd to change it to something like just MID, but need a better editor as (Kate) is not saving the program back in correct iso (character) format. So I thought I'd pose the question in the meanwhile.
Thanks, John |
69178
|
Wed Jul 22 19:10:08 2020 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | ELOG V3.1.2-bd7 | Re: How to change name of record Id from $@MID@$. |
No idea what you are talking about. $@MID@$ is used in the database files to indicate the start of a new message. It is not used on any elog web page. If you want to put the message ID on your web page, you should use the variable "$message id" as written in the documentation. You say JS, where is your JS running? You wrote a JS program to work on the raw elog database files? Or you wrote an extension to run in your browse? You have to be a bit clearer.
Stefan
John wrote: |
Hi Everyone,
I tried using this $@MID@$ in JS as a variable and cannot doit. I researched a little and found no answer on special character usage. If anyone knows, please lemme know. I also tried breifly in Elogd to change it to something like just MID, but need a better editor as (Kate) is not saving the program back in correct iso (character) format. So I thought I'd pose the question in the meanwhile.
Thanks, John
|
|
69215
|
Wed Sep 9 11:41:23 2020 |
| Zbigniew Reszela | zreszela@cells.es | Question | All | V2.9.2-2455 | Insert images slow downs the ELOG |
Dear all,
First, many thanks for creating and sharing this great tool which is ELOG! Our users are very happy with it!
I have few questions about inserting images into the entries.
From time to time our users insert them directly in the editor what leads to encoding the whole image in the HTML log file and the images does not appear in the attachments list. Saving and further editing of such entries slows down the whole ELOG server which uses 100% of CPU.
I'm not sure how they do it Ctrl+C & Ctrl+V, drag & drop, etc.. What I know is that if they add it using the "Insert image" action in the editor there are no problems and the images are properly listed in the attachments.
I read in the docs:
uploading or downloading an attachement file is a single request, and causes the entire file to be loaded in server memory while the request is being processed.
This is not normally a problem for the sort of short, text-mode entries ELOG is designed to support. However, if a user starts to upload or download a large attachment file (or image) over a slow link, all other users on that ELOG server will have to wait for that transfert to finish before they can access any logbook on that server. This is why there is a low limit on the size of attachments, and why ELOG should not be used to distribute large files under intensive multi-user conditions.
but I think this is not our case. Here I talk about wrongly inserting a single image of 700KiB.
So, I'm asking:
- Is the behavior that we observe something already detected? If yes, which are exactly the wrong ways of inserting the images?
- Is it fixed in newer ELOG versions?
- Is it possible to disable the wrong ways of inserting the images in order to avoid such problems?
Many thanks in advance for your help! |