ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
69611
|
Wed Jan 4 12:17:46 2023 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | All | ELOG V3.1.4-493 | wrap "pre" tag in a "div" with fixed width |
Didn't work for me. The text is just truncated after the width and no extra lines are added. |
Attachment 1: Screenshot_2023-01-04_at_12.16.47_.png
|
|
69614
|
Wed Jan 4 14:05:25 2023 |
| Andrey Pashnin | kowaraj4stuff@gmail.com | Bug fix | All | ELOG V3.1.4-493 | wrap "pre" tag in a "div" with fixed width |
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I also added some styles to the <pre> tag:
style="white-space: normal"
(see the screenshot on my previous post) |
69615
|
Wed Jan 4 14:23:12 2023 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | All | ELOG V3.1.4-493 | wrap "pre" tag in a "div" with fixed width |
> Sorry, I forgot to mention that I also added some styles to the <pre> tag:
> style="white-space: normal"
> (see the screenshot on my previous post)
Actually the
style="white-space: normal"
makes the difference, the <div> is not necessary at all!
But I'm not sure that "white-space: normal" is what we want. All manual line breaks in an entry are collapsed and you get just one text block without any new line. See here
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/white-space
I guess we want "white-space: pre-wrap" which keeps the old line breaks.
You can try that out by changing elog.css:
--- a/themes/default/elog.css
+++ b/themes/default/elog.css
@@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ td {
.messagepre {
font-family:'lucida console',courier,monospace;
+ white-space:pre-wrap;
}
and see the effect. If you like it, just keep it. No need to recompile elogd.cxx.
Stefan |
69616
|
Wed Jan 4 14:38:54 2023 |
| Andrey Pashnin | kowaraj4stuff@gmail.com | Bug fix | All | ELOG V3.1.4-493 | white-space: pre-wrap" |
> I guess we want "white-space: pre-wrap" which keeps the old line breaks.
Yep. You're right. Thanks! |
69618
|
Thu Jan 19 15:28:16 2023 |
| Sebastian Schenk | sebastian.schenk@physik.uni-halle.de | Request | All | - | Wikipedia Article deleted |
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived. |
69619
|
Thu Jan 19 17:00:37 2023 |
| Stefan Ritt | I astefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted |
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
69620
|
Fri Jan 20 10:25:23 2023 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted |
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
69621
|
Fri Jan 20 13:12:48 2023 |
| Sebastian Schenk | sebastian.schenk@physik.uni-halle.de | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted |
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|