Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 724 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  715   Thu Oct 7 11:01:00 2004 Reply Gulzamanzamanilyas@gawab.com Windows Re: Windows XP Login Problem...
> >
  714   Thu Oct 7 01:27:27 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.ch Windows Re: Windows XP Login Problem...
> W
  713   Wed Oct 6 06:14:36 2004 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comCommentAll2.5.4Re: Enhanced "eLog Version" Variable
No big deal - I looked at the code and you did a much more thorough job than I
would have done. Appreciate all of the hard work -- this product is masterful!

> Sorry for that. The idea is that the -4 is the minor number between releases
> (mainly for bug fixes and impatient users (;-) ). I accidently overwrote the
> -4 version several times when testing a new RPM building scheme, but I promise
> to take more care in the future (:-)))
> 
> Having the CVS revision in the executable is however a good idea and I will
> put it in.
> 
> > Stefan, would it be ok to add the "minor" revision level to the VERSION
> > constant?  I've been doing this after I download source just so I can keep
> > things straight, you keep cranking out versions ;->
> > 
> > EX: 
> > #define VERSION "2.5.4-4"
> > BECOMES
> > #define VERSION "2.5.4-4-1.483" or something like that?
> > 
> > Just a thought.
> > 
> > Thanks
  711   Wed Sep 29 01:28:22 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux Re: Attachment file "" empty or not found
That problem has been fixed in 2.5.4-5
  710   Tue Sep 28 22:44:50 2004 Question roetsjim.roets@valero.comQuestionLinux Attachment file "" empty or not found
I am getting the following error message with version 2.5.4-4 when I try to
add a new entry to a log book.

Attachment file "" empty or not found

If I add the following line to me elogd.cfg I do not get the error, but will
not be able to use attachments.

Enable attachments = 0

I recently upgraded from version 2.2.5 which did not have the problem.  I
did not see anything in the changelog referencing this type of change to how
attachments are handled.

I there something I need to set in the config so that an attachment is not
expected every time a new entry is made?
  709   Fri Sep 24 22:37:01 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.5.4Re: Enhanced "eLog Version" Variable
Sorry for that. The idea is that the -4 is the minor number between releases
(mainly for bug fixes and impatient users (;-) ). I accidently overwrote the
-4 version several times when testing a new RPM building scheme, but I promise
to take more care in the future (:-)))

Having the CVS revision in the executable is however a good idea and I will
put it in.

> Stefan, would it be ok to add the "minor" revision level to the VERSION
> constant?  I've been doing this after I download source just so I can keep
> things straight, you keep cranking out versions ;->
> 
> EX: 
> #define VERSION "2.5.4-4"
> BECOMES
> #define VERSION "2.5.4-4-1.483" or something like that?
> 
> Just a thought.
> 
> Thanks
  708   Fri Sep 24 19:17:52 2004 Idea Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comRequestAll2.5.4Enhanced "eLog Version" Variable
Stefan, would it be ok to add the "minor" revision level to the VERSION
constant?  I've been doing this after I download source just so I can keep
things straight, you keep cranking out versions ;->

EX: 
#define VERSION "2.5.4-4"
BECOMES
#define VERSION "2.5.4-4-1.483" or something like that?

Just a thought.

Thanks
  707   Wed Sep 15 00:16:19 2004    QuestionWindows2.5.4-2Re: Use Email From not Working as Before...
I gave the user email address priority over the "Use email from" option, that
means only if the user does not have an email address, then the "Use email from"
value is used. Now I realize that the priority is maybe wrong, so I should give
the "use email from" switch the highest priority. Only if this flag is not
present, then the system uses the user's email address. If that one is not
present, too, then the system uses "elog@<host>".

I applied this change to the CVS version, so let me know if it is ok with you.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6