Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry, posted by eric wooten on Mon Feb 10 23:19:50 2003
|
I just noticed that the notifications I receive from your ELOG system,
doesn't show anyone in the "TO:" section but myself. Or is ELOG configured
to only send myself a message?
> Another Question: Could ELOG be configured to send notifications as a
Blind
> Copy? Just wondering if that would take care of the problem?
>
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > Many users have there email forward to Blackberry devices. Although I
> > wasn't aware, it appears the Blackberry has a limit (or maybe one was
set)
> > of how big the message can be (still checking for that though).
> >
> > Previously, a modification was made that addressed the issue of slow ELOG
> > response when saving the elog entry. I think the change was for ELOG to
> > generate one email and send to all the users designated to receive the
> > notification. This caused everyone to show up as "TO" addresses.
> >
> > This change makes the Email header increase in size (length). I guess
the
> > Blackberry counts the Header portion as part of the email size limit.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric |
Find , posted by eric wooten on Mon Feb 10 23:36:31 2003
|
When you do a find in elog, records per page (some crazy large number - for
your forum logbook, display 57 entries seem to cause the problem, then
select last year (1 years worth of logs),(don't select printable)
the results appear way off the screen (the message body looks fine, but the
title, etc extend way off the screen).
Printable doesn't have this problem. |
Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 11 08:57:39 2003
|
> I just noticed that the notifications I receive from your ELOG system,
> doesn't show anyone in the "TO:" section but myself. Or is ELOG
configured
> to only send myself a message?
This is on purpose. I have many people registered for the Forum. So when a
notification is sent, it is not a good idea if everybody sees everybody
else's mail addresses. Therefor I have
Omit Email to = 1
in the config file. This way the "To:" field is omitted to "hide" the mail
recipients from each other. Your mail client realizes that and fills in your
own address automatically, that's why you only see yourself. Maybe you try
that option, might help with your previous problem as well.
- Stefan |
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 11 09:03:18 2003
|
> Would be nice if you can specify which columns data has links as a flag or
> setting of some sorts, as opposed to either the first or all, but given a
> choice I would want the first column to be the linkable one
Well, I decided to make all entries in a table a link, to be consistent with
the threaded display. But I changed the style such that they look like
before, but are actually links. This way it cannot hurt (like having too
much underlined text). The style can be changed via classes ".list1"
and ".list2" in the style sheet.
The modification will come in 2.3.1, or you can get the source code from CVS
under
http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/src/elogd.c
and
http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/themes/default/default.css
> > > Problem 2 - no matter what i try in the config file i cannot get elogd
to
> > > use stylesheets ive tried specifying and even editing and removing the
> > > default.css style sheet i downloaded but it just seems to ignore its
> there.
>
> I resolved this problem, many thanks for your help
What happened. If you tell your initial problems, I can maybe put something
into the docs so that others won't have it...
- Stefan |
Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0, posted by Nick on Tue Feb 11 11:17:29 2003
|
> > > > Problem 2 - no matter what i try in the config file i cannot get
elogd
> to
> > > > use stylesheets ive tried specifying and even editing and removing
the
> > > > default.css style sheet i downloaded but it just seems to ignore its
> > there.
> >
> > I resolved this problem, many thanks for your help
>
> What happened. If you tell your initial problems, I can maybe put something
> into the docs so that others won't have it...
>
> - Stefan
I upgraded to version 2.3.0 the previous version didnt seem to work with
stylesheets, when you viewed the html source there was no stylesheet defined
in it.
Please see my other posts for feature requests.
Many Thanks - FANTASTIC program btw |
Feature request, posted by Nick on Tue Feb 11 11:26:03 2003
|
Can you consider implementing the following additions to the functionality
1) Subt on edit <attribute> = xyz
This would be fantastic for implementing version control so you can see who
has edited a posted or a db entry.
2) Have a SORT fieldname flag so you can decide which column to sort things
by on a display listing in conjunction to the display flags, it current
defaults to the # column and I find i am directly linking to a sorted
display
3) Have the elogd.conf track actual log entries people have changed
detailing date and time etc.
4) Ability to export contents of the log books to files on disk for backup
purposes as all data is contained within a single log file which causes
problem for command line searches.
Many thanks |
Re: Feature request, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 11 11:45:22 2003
|
> Can you consider implementing the following additions to the functionality
>
> 1) Subt on edit <attribute> = xyz
>
> This would be fantastic for implementing version control so you can see
who
> has edited a posted or a db entry.
Can you give me an example of how you would use that?
> 2) Have a SORT fieldname flag so you can decide which column to sort
things
> by on a display listing in conjunction to the display flags, it current
> defaults to the # column and I find i am directly linking to a sorted
> display
Sorting is not done by the "#" column but by the sequence when messages have
been entered. You can sort the table differently by clicking on the table
titles (twice for reverse sort). To sort by default on a column, for example
sort by the author, you can add
Start page = ?sort=author
into elogd.cfg which does the job.
> 3) Have the elogd.conf track actual log entries people have changed
> detailing date and time etc.
Revision management is not forseen by the structure of the ELOG database.
What you can do is if you edit a message you check "Resubmit as new entry",
then you keep a copy of the old version.
> 4) Ability to export contents of the log books to files on disk for backup
> purposes as all data is contained within a single log file which causes
> problem for command line searches.
Well, you have already all log book files on disk in a simple format:
YYMMDDa.log
(Year/Month/Day) which you can easily backup. By a mask like 02*a.log you
can backup all data from 2002 and so on. The idea of having separate log
files for each day is to have this possibility to simply backup various date
intervals.
What kind of command line searches are you interested in?
- Stefan |
Re: Feature request, posted by Nick on Wed Feb 12 01:11:08 2003
|
> > Can you consider implementing the following additions to the functionality
> >
> > 1) Subt on edit <attribute> = xyz
> >
> > This would be fantastic for implementing version control so you can see
> who
> > has edited a posted or a db entry.
>
> Can you give me an example of how you would use that?
-----
Lets say you are storing configuration information relating to a customers
solution, you need the ability to track who has made what changes to the
config information stored in the log book so you can backtrack who changed
what and when, for example
If you have a field name called Last Edited by this field is locked and not
editable using the Lock attributes flag, but if you had Subt on edit
everytime that entry is updated it places your login name into this field and
therefore stamps it to say you have edited it, as the field isnt free txt it
cant be spoofed as the $long_name comes from your login details.
-----
>
> > 2) Have a SORT fieldname flag so you can decide which column to sort
> things
> > by on a display listing in conjunction to the display flags, it current
> > defaults to the # column and I find i am directly linking to a sorted
> > display
>
> Sorting is not done by the "#" column but by the sequence when messages
have
> been entered. You can sort the table differently by clicking on the table
> titles (twice for reverse sort). To sort by default on a column, for
example
> sort by the author, you can add
>
> Start page = ?sort=author
>
> into elogd.cfg which does the job.
----
Excellent I didnt know what Ill try that tomorrow
----
|