ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
928
|
Thu Feb 10 09:03:02 2005 |
| Michael Husbyn | michaelh@online.no | Question | Linux | 2.5.6-1 | MIME encoding of mail? | Hello,
This software is very good :) I like it, but I have some trouble with some
emails that I send from the system.
It seems that Outlook 2000 does not handle norwegian characters in the
Subject field when sending mails. We have Exchange and I don't know what
SMTP server that fetches mail from. We are sending mail out via sendmail on
RedHat ES V3 server.
Example (what it should be)
Subject: Testing ורז
Becomes
Subject: IKT sak =?UNKNOWN?B?KDYwKTo=?= Testing =?UNKNOWN?B?5fjm?=
config:
Use Email Subject = IKT sak ($message id): $Tittel
Ofcource this is only happens in Outlook. Sending to gmail reports it OK.
I've also seen that mutt sometimes replaces the ורז with ? at my Linux
system at home.
Ofcource all this could be due to misconfigured clients. Outlook receives
mails with ורז fine when send from allmost all other systems.
I've suspect that this could be some old 7 bit / 8 bit problem or that the
mail is not properly encoded in MIME format?
If i send mail without any ורז characters in subject the subject is
displayed the way it should be.
Not a big problem though, not sure that it has been reportet before.
Searched for mime and found nothing useful.
Have a nice day!
Best regards
Michael |
953
|
Sat Feb 19 18:39:52 2005 |
| Heiko Scheit | h.scheit@mpi-hd.mpg.de | Bug fix | Linux | 2.5.7 | Problem with 'Show Attributes' option | There is a problem with the 'Show Attributes' option
causing the 'Format ...' options to be ignored.
See attachment for patch. |
Attachment 1: patch
|
--- elogd.c_20050219 Sat Feb 19 18:15:09 2005
+++ elogd.c Sat Feb 19 18:25:55 2005
@@ -8169,7 +8169,7 @@
if (format_flags[index] & AFF_SAME_LINE)
/* if attribute on same line, do nothing */
rsprintf("");
- else if (index < n_attr - 1 && (format_flags[index + 1] & AFF_SAME_LINE)) {
+ else if (aindex < n_disp_attr - 1 && (format_flags[attr_index[aindex + 1]] & AFF_SAME_LINE)) {
/* if next attribute on same line, start a new subtable */
rsprintf("<tr><td colspan=2><table width=\"100%%\" cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tr>");
subtable = 1;
@@ -8469,7 +8469,7 @@
}
}
- if (index < n_attr - 1 && (format_flags[index + 1] & AFF_SAME_LINE) == 0) {
+ if (aindex < n_disp_attr - 1 && (format_flags[attr_index[aindex + 1]] & AFF_SAME_LINE) == 0) {
/* if next attribute not on same line, close row or subtable */
if (subtable) {
rsprintf("</table></td></tr>\n");
@@ -8479,7 +8479,7 @@
}
/* if last attribute, close row or subtable */
- if (index == n_attr - 1) {
+ if (aindex == n_disp_attr - 1) {
if (subtable) {
rsprintf("</table></td></tr>\n");
subtable = 0;
|
958
|
Wed Feb 23 18:07:24 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | r1.571 | boundary problem with Type lists display | using:
Display mode = threaded
List display = Subject, Type, Author, Date
in the config file (omitting "ID" then) rise the bug
ie, an unneeded "," is displayed after the "supposed to be printed" ID |
974
|
Mon Mar 7 16:05:22 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Bug report | All | rev. 1.51 | Display <attribute> do erroneously encoded |
Display subject = <b>$subject</b>
is printed to the browser encoded, so that it is diplayed as is.. |
1046
|
Thu Mar 31 16:29:07 2005 |
| Michael Husbyn | michaelh@online.no | Question | Linux | 2.5.8-2 | Want to change Entry time when using Copy To | Hello,
Tried to use the copy to version, just to create a new copy of a old case in
the same logbook
(e.g, support logbook, user with an old problem, to copy it to a new entry)
What I want is to have the Entry time to be updated to the time it was
copyed, not the original entry time. Moved To should perhaps retain its
original time?
Somethings that is possible or a new feature that has to be implemented?
Thanks for this great software Stefan!
Best regards
Michael Husbyn |
1155
|
Sat May 21 15:05:23 2005 |
| David Spindler | dsspindler@earthlink.net | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Incorrect Display | I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.
I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.
BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively. |
Attachment 1: capture-firefox-1.03.JPG
|
|
1156
|
Sat May 21 15:23:08 2005 |
| David Spindler | dsspindler@earthlink.net | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Incorrect Display |
David Spindler wrote: | I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.
I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.
BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively. |
I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.
BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote: | "Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>" |
|
Attachment 1: capture-firefox-1.03-log-entry.JPG
|
|
1157
|
Mon May 23 17:47:24 2005 |
| David Spindler | dsspindler@earthlink.net | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.0-beta | Re: Incorrect Display | Never mind. I figured it out. I used two fields (date and time) that are automatically placed in elog. It messed up the spacing, altough what was puzzling was that it displayed correctly on the entry itself, but not the list. Anyway, I renamed the date and time to another name and it is ok.
Thanks, anyway. Keep up the good work.
David Spindler wrote: |
David Spindler wrote: | I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.
I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.
BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively. |
I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.
BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote: | "Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>" |
|
|
|