| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
543
|
Thu May 20 00:55:51 2004 |
 | Ralph Kuehn | r.e.kuehn@larc.nasa.gov | | Windows | 2.5.2 | User/Admin privlege question |
Hello,
For some reason if I define a "login user" that is allowed the configure
option he is also allowed to change the configuration file. According to the
documentation it seems like this should NOT be the case. Any ideas as to
what the problem might be?
Thanks in advance for any help/advice.
Ralph |
|
542
|
Fri May 14 06:19:40 2004 |
 | nait tauh | nait@no2bl.no-ip.com | Question | Linux | 2.5.2 | Using date and subst date |
I'm trying capture any edit/modified entry with the following, Using the
real date format instead of text string so that I could do a quick filter on it.
Type modified = date
Subst on Edit modified = $date
Problem: It seem that the Subst on Edit always default to 1 Jan 1970 instead
of current date on edit screen.
Could it be $date is a string and not compatible with tape date? or is there
a variable or function to convert $date to date format?
Thanks,
nait |
|
541
|
Tue May 11 19:35:11 2004 |
 | Marc Neiger | m.neiger@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> > The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
> > the port directive in elog.cfg....
>
> Thank you, I fixed that and updated the file.
Tested and working, thx. |
|
540
|
Tue May 11 11:18:24 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
> the port directive in elog.cfg....
Thank you, I fixed that and updated the file. |
|
539
|
Tue May 11 11:08:33 2004 |
| Marc Neiger | m.neiger@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> > Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
>
> In principle yes, but I never tried it...
The snapshot version you sent me seems to be locked onto port 80 and does not honor
the port directive in elog.cfg.... |
|
538
|
Tue May 11 10:44:55 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
In principle yes, but I never tried it... |
|
537
|
Tue May 11 10:42:44 2004 |
| Marc Neiger | m.neiger@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
Hi Stefan,
Many thanks, it works. I'm impressed by your reactivity ! thanks again.
Is it possible to have a conditionnal attribute depend on an extendanble one ?
> > the use of extendable options in the global section seem to "crash" elogd
> > when creating a new entry.
> > My elogd.cfg is included
> > the problem attribute is "Client"
> > Should it be possible to have it extendable only in one specific logbook ?
>
> Actually it was never foreseen to have extendable options in the [global]
> section. I added now this functionality. The new windows version can be obtained
> under
>
> http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elogd-snapshot.exe |
|
536
|
Mon May 10 21:57:49 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: Extendable options |
> the use of extendable options in the global section seem to "crash" elogd
> when creating a new entry.
> My elogd.cfg is included
> the problem attribute is "Client"
> Should it be possible to have it extendable only in one specific logbook ?
Actually it was never foreseen to have extendable options in the [global]
section. I added now this functionality. The new windows version can be obtained
under
http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elogd-snapshot.exe |