Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 11:19:51 2005
|
> Hi to all,
>
> I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|
wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 11:29:51 2005
|
When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 12:54:51 2005
|
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
>
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 10:51:10 2005
|
> > When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> > display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
> >
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:00:59 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:01:06 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 12:26:46 2005
|
> > It seems to work nice to me.
> > Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> > example for all allowed parameters in the distributed /etc/default/elog
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 12:30:07 2005
|
> Hi to all,
>
> I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|