Re: upgrading, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 25 09:05:06 2002
|
Ooops, I just realized that the Windows 2.2.3 distribution contained the old
(2.2.2) executable for elogd.exe. I apologize for that. I have updated the
elog223.exe distribution just now, so please download it again in order to
|
Re: upgrading, posted by tony summerfelt on Wed Nov 27 07:22:07 2002
|
> Ooops, I just realized that the Windows 2.2.3 distribution contained the old
> (2.2.2) executable for elogd.exe. I apologize for that. I have updated the
|
New directory scheme from version 2.2.5 on, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 7 17:48:25 2003
|
Starting from version 2.2.5 on, an new directory scheme has been
implemented. The idea is to separate the config file from the theme/icon
and the logbook directories. This can now be achieved by specifying the
|
|
"User" and "Group" statements changed from Version 2.2.5, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 7 17:49:40 2003
|
From Version 2.2.5 on, the configuration file entries
User = ...
|
|
New Version, posted by Nick on Tue Feb 18 08:07:10 2003
|
I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1,
however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other
places where I can get 2.3.1
|
|
Re: New Version, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 18 09:21:34 2003
|
> I noticed the site has been updated as far as the documentation for 2.3.1,
> however the latest version in the downloads section is 2.3.0, any other
> places where I can get 2.3.1
|
Participation on development of ELOG, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Wed Feb 19 09:26:04 2003
|
Stefan,
We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
|
Re: Participation on development of ELOG, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 19 09:37:30 2003
|
> We are interested in using your ELOG (which we consider to be a wonderful
> application) even more. We would like to make a few adaptations in your
> source code, above all to add some functionality that we are missing.
|