ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1795
|
Wed Apr 5 18:56:48 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Request | | 2.6.1 | Re: Simple math within an elog form |
Steve Jones wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Steve Jones wrote: |
Subst TotalRisk = $shell(echo $Risk1 + $Risk2 + $Risk3 > /tmp/elog_out)
What comes out with my simple echo or gawk line is "+ + " so it looks like the attributes are not getting passed into the $shell code? |
The reason is that the substitutions get evaluated from left to right, so first the shell is called with $Risk1, and because the shell by itself does a subsitution and $Risk1 is not defined on the unix system, the shell returns an empty string, leading to "+ +" as the result.
I changed that in the current SVN version, so we have first the attribute substitions, then then shell substitution. The "echo $Risk1..." will of course not work, since it gets substituted by elog as "echo 12 + 23 + 45" (or whatever the numbers are), and the "echo" will just return these numbers without adding them. To make the shell to add things, you would need to define the risks as environment variables for the shell, so I guess the "gawk" method will work better for you. I tried it and it worked fine for me. |
Sorry, I waSn't clear about just why I was using "echo". Since elog removes the /tmp/elog_shell temporary file I couldn't "see" what was actually being passed to the shell - gawk was giving me an error and I was flying blind. So I used echo to create my own temporary file.
Yes, gawk should now work -- I'l download and compile the latest and provide feedback.
Thanks! |
Ok, confirming that this now works. Passing the command:
Subst <attribute> = $shell(gawk 'BEGIN{ print $Attrib1 + $Attrib2 + $Attrib3 }' )
will cause the result to be pushed into <attribute>, so gawk in essence becomes a simple calculator and operates on the formula "$Attrib1 + $Attrib2 + $Attrib3". |
1810
|
Sat Apr 15 00:37:48 2006 |
| Marco Calf | marco@kelf.nl.eu.org | Comment | Linux | 2.5.7 | User review..use case: implementing GTD |
Playing with elog for a day made me very happy. I was looking for a webbased thingy to support list building for 'Getting Things Done' by David Allen ( David Allen's Getting Things Done ).
Elog is simple, intuitative and very powerfull!
Less informative is the fact that i found no bugs till now 
On usablitity..maybe some more control over the dialog..eg the 'in between' screens (eg after a move...the 'to which log i would like to resume' question)...or have an option to be in select mode by default.
Tnx |
1812
|
Wed Apr 19 04:48:43 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.1-1684 | Re: Any way to move Replies from one logentry to another? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Steve Jones wrote: | Is there anyway to reattach a reply within a logbook from one logentry to another? I guess it would be "re-associate"? |
No, this is not possible directly. You would have to make a new reply, and manually fill in the contents from the original reply. It is however possible by directly tampering the ELOG files, but that should be done only by experienced users. |
Kind of what I thought but needed to ask. I think I'll leave things as they are. Thanks! |
1839
|
Thu May 25 02:28:27 2006 |
| Ed To | eto@arc.nasa.gov | Question | Windows | 2.6.1 | Re: Display legal banner |
Stefan,
Thanks again. I got it to display my legal banner. |
1864
|
Fri Jun 23 19:24:12 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | All | 2.6.1-1681 | Re: Losing field 'focus' when using Conditional Attributes |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Steve Jones wrote: | It appears to only be applicable when one defines conditional Options - when javascript updates the conditional lists the input focus appears to shift to the HTML edit area. I am still running ELOG V2.6.1-1681 and this is under Windows (my test system). |
It was some new code used for inline images. If you upload an inline image, an extra window opens which lets you select the image file. After that operation, you want to have the focus back at the text box. Unfortunately this also happened now after the JavaScript update of conditional attributes. I fixed that in the new version 2.6.1-6. |
Quote: | Just compiled and tested on Solaris 8 -- works great!! |
|
1878
|
Fri Jul 14 20:29:21 2006 |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos | elaine@ccuec.unicamp.br | Comment | Linux | 2.6.1-1681 | Re: Inserting images via Internet Explorer |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | I observed that there is a difference between IE and others browsers.
When I use "insert image" button in Netscape, for instance,
it creates automatically a tag like [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] and
includes an attachment in the ELOG entry.
When a try to do the same action in Internet Explorer, only
the attachment is created without the tag [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] . |
This is a problem of the JavaScript implementation of Internet Explorer. After some externsive research I found now a way to convince IE to do the right thing. The fix is contains in SVN revision 1701 and will be released with 2.6.2-2 soon. |
Great job !
I tried the SVN revision 1701, and it works perfectly.
Thank you for all your effort.
Regards,
Elaine |
1975
|
Tue Oct 10 23:27:41 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox |
Stefan Ritt wrote: | Suppress email on edit has been implemented in the current SVN revision just similar to the Suppress default flag having possible values of 0, 1, 2 and 3. |
Works like a champ! Thanks |
2006
|
Thu Oct 19 07:00:57 2006 |
| Grant Jeffcote | grant@jeffcote.org | Question | Windows | 2.5.2 | Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line |
> > Is there any way to configure elog so that attribute fields can be edited
> > on more than line like the 'text' field?
> >
> > (This would be useful so that attributes could contain larger portions of
> > text including line breaks)
>
> No, but this request is already on the wishlist
> (http://midas.psi.ch/elog/wishlist.html) since some time. I added your vote.
Hi Stefan, could you add my vote for this feature too please?
Many thx |